[gnso-gac-closed-generics] Closed Generics Dialogue Documents

[Kathy Kleiman]

Hi Melissa,

Tx you for your detailed recent emails.  I have a question.   As I 
understand it, we start our discussion tomorrow on Discussion Draft v2, 
*Section IV*, Evaluating a Closed Generic gTLD Application, 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wtLVcyWhyrCaYl1iqlAncaIyrqpS--0aPCTjpwMue7I/edit

If that is right, then after Section IV, we move to Section V, 
Contracting & Post-Delegation Review. /After Section V, do we return to 
the top of the document, the summary /Sections I and II, General 
Principles and Definitions /or will these summary sections be revised or 
replaced in light of our recent and upcoming work in Sections III to V?
/

Best and tx, Kathy

On 4/28/2023 2:48 PM, Melissa Peters Allgood wrote:

> Hello again,
>
> As I mentioned in my email about timeline, we ask you incorporate the 
> following two documents into your Closed Generics efforts moving forward.
>
> *Red Line Table 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/14Iw5dya1WywzeuVBjBfSYDQ80MT-2wCJNPbeNl4kbzw/edit>*
>
> We’ve asked you add the rationale for any red lines you have in this 
> table. In the interest of time, areas that saw broad agreement during 
> our red line discussions have been included (or excluded depending on 
> the question) into the clean v3 document below. Areas that did not see 
> broad agreement during our red line discussions will be subject to 
> follow up in the coming days.
>
> *Closed Generics Framework v3 (Clean Document) 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u0Nb9_CJ-6R_ZF4bt9wbkzxLhMKu64aKY_vzS3QixgQ/edit>*
>
> Specific areas where the group indicated broad agreement that a given 
> issue was a must include red line have been placed in this document. 
> This includes issues that fall into the Notable Concern category of 
> our red line discussions (implementability, covered by SubPro, the 
> issue was in the wrong section of the framework, duplicative of the 
> guidebook, or specific concerns with the text but not the issue 
> itself). We will continue to work through these Notable Concerns in 
> the coming days. Please do not comment or edit this document.
>
> *_Next Call_*
>
> I hope we can conclude the remaining red line discussions within 
> Discussion Draft v2 during our next call, Wednesday, May 3 at 20:00 
> UTC and move onto focused discussions on those red line areas that 
> have not seen broad support.
>
> Wishing you all a lovely weekend,
>
> Melissa
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-gac-closed-generics mailing list
> gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-gac-closed-generics
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-gac-closed-generics/attachments/20230502/91fe5f43/attachment.html>