[GNSO-GGP-WG] REMINDER FINAL-FOR REVIEW & CONSENSUS CALL: GGP Guidance Recommendations Final Report

[Lawrence O. Olawale-Roberts]

Hi Julie,

As of this moment there has been no objections expressed by members of the CSG.

Lawrence
________________________________
From: GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 3:47 PM
To: gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-GGP-WG] REMINDER FINAL-FOR REVIEW & CONSENSUS CALL: GGP Guidance Recommendations Final Report


Dear Working Group members,



Reminder that per the request below, by COB TODAY please indicate your group’s position on the CONSENSUS DESIGNATIONS in ANNEX C of the attached Final Report.  If we do not hear from you we will assume your group is in agreement with the designations.



Kind regards,

Julie



From: GNSO-GGP-WG <gnso-ggp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 at 10:42 AM
To: "gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-ggp-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-GGP-WG] FINAL-FOR REVIEW & CONSENSUS CALL: GGP Guidance Recommendations Final Report



Dear Working Group members,



Thank you again for all your work on this very important effort.



Per the discussion on yesterday’s call, Monday, 04 December 2023, the working group agreed to one minor change in the attached Final Draft of the Final Report: to include in Guidance Recommendation 1 to clarify the meaning of “under-served” in the Implementation Guidance, page 9, to include a footnote from the Initial Report deliberations referencing the GAC definition as follows: “The working group agreed to cite from the Initial Report the GAC's definition of under-served: https://gac.icann.org/working-group/gac-working-group-on-underserved-regions-usrwg [gac.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gac.icann.org/working-group/gac-working-group-on-underserved-regions-usrwg__;!!PtGJab4!5333mm3P75BiFELEOxEZwalPHRJ_0BTwSv0a0CuQjQJmDNYoTmEL10dkfYbtYUvRQS614xrJaYvxinKzfqOVcHpb5Vk1WWPs7w$>, specifically: “An under-served region is defined as one that: Does not have a well developed DNS and/or associated industry or economy…”” The working group also agreed to correct a couple of typographical errors.  Other than these very minor changes the working group agreed with the attached text as written.



REPORT REVIEW: Working Group members are requested to review, with their respective groups, Section 3 of the Final Report and provide suggested minor edits, if any, in redline/review mode not later than COB Thursday, 07 December.  Note that minor edits are welcome for the other sections of the report, although those sections are mostly unchanged from the Initial Report.



CONSENSUS CALL: Working Group members are requested to review, with their respective groups, the Consensus Designations for each Guidance Recommendation listed in Annex C and to indicate on the Working Group list as soon as possible but not later than COB Thursday, 07 December if their groups agree with the Consensus Designations, or if there are objections. Per the GNSO Guidance Process Manual: “Each recommendation in the Final Report should be accompanied by the appropriate consensus level designation (see section 3.6 – Standard Methodology for Making Decisions in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-15mar23-en.pdf__;!!PtGJab4!8vaHrOCw8ftmRr2uI3_KyK_hY3zkpGtroJTW1PkXxeQl3FxtpO34kZNWkg0xWE0F9zI7OPRvb1EljqvWmqVb7JdJI66zHT5XUQ$>).



Thank you very much again for your consideration.  Following the completion of this process the Final Report will be submitted to the GNSO Council with a draft motion on Monday, 11 December – the document and motion deadline.



Kind regards,

Julie and Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ggp-wg/attachments/20231208/ad099e5f/attachment.html>