<div dir="ltr">Hi Julie<div><br></div><div>Thank you for these notes following up on the discussions from our last meeting.</div><div><br></div><div>Are we going to be getting a copy of the clean version of this document before it goes out for public comment? (so that we can prepare our communities as to what it will look like.</div><div><br></div><div>How long will public comment take? and when will we be able to include the suggestions that came from our communities to assist the IRT with identifying measures for success which was the main focus of our first discussions (well mine I guess, because I came onto the GGP late).. </div><div><br></div><div>The version of the document that was discussed at the DC meeting didn't cover a lot of the discussion that took place at our meetings. I was just wondering when that additional information was going to be added. </div><div><br></div><div>Maureen</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 12:34 AM Julie Hedlund <<a href="mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org">julie.hedlund@icann.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg-3249808852370119082">
<div lang="EN-US" style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">
<div class="m_-3249808852370119082WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Dear Working Group members,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black">Please see below the action items and brief notes for the GGP WG meeting
</span>at ICANN77 on 13 June at 1530-1700 EDT (local time), 1930-2200 UTC<span style="color:black">. These also are posted on the wiki at:<span class="m_-3249808852370119082apple-converted-space"> </span></span>
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/GGPGIRFAS/2023+Meetings" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/GGPGIRFAS/2023+Meetings</a>.
<span style="color:black"> Please note that these are not a substitute for the recordings also posted to the wiki.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black">The next meeting will be</span> in <i>two weeks</i> on <b>
Monday, 03 July at 2000 UTC</b>.<span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black">Kind regards,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black">Steve and Julie<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<b><span style="color:black">ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:</span><u></u><u></u></b></p>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph"><b>Staff to insert the finalized text for Tasks 3-6 Recommendation Guidance into the Report format for WG review.<i><u></u><u></u></i></b></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph"><b>WG members to provide comments on 1) any gaps in the rationale or deliberations summaries for Tasks 3-6; 2) re: Task 3-5 Recommendations Guidance 5 – whether “applications” should replace “applicants”
in, “Of all successfully delegated gTLD applicants [applications], the goal is that no fewer than 10, or 0.5 percent (.005), of them were supported applicants [applications]” and in the text that follows. If so, please provide a rationale for the change.<i><u></u><u></u></i></b></li></ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">Notes:</span><u></u><u></u></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">Draft Agenda</span></b><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<b><span style="color:black">GGP WG-Applicant Support Working Session at ICANN77</span></b><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<b><span style="color:black">Tuesday, 13 June at 1530-1700 EDT (local time), 1930-2200 UTC</span></b><span style="color:black"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black">1. Welcome<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black">2. Overview of the GGP – see attached slides<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">3. Review of the Draft Recommendation Guidance: Tasks 3-5 Working Document – see:
<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LTHZpqnfyobWqwApefHRYOlOPxrDZ4HBJL8hAvDV5HY/edit?usp=sharing" target="_blank">
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LTHZpqnfyobWqwApefHRYOlOPxrDZ4HBJL8hAvDV5HY/edit?usp=sharing</a>
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Overview:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">GGP Support Staff noted that the WG has agreed to the Recommendations Guidance for Tasks 3-5 but has likely not had a chance to review the new text on the methodology and the rationale
and deliberations.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">The GGP Chair noted that because of travel and the timing of the distribution of the working document the WG members would have additional time to review the document. Thus the WG’s next
meeting would be postponed for two weeks to Monday, 03 July. During the intervening period WG members could provide comments on gaps, if any, in the rationale and deliberations for Tasks 3-6.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">GGP Support Staff read through the working document, beginning with a summary of the methodology the WG followed in the development of the final draft recommendations for Tasks 3-5.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Next the staff read the text of each Recommendation Guidance, while noting that the WG had previously discussed and agreed to the text as reflected in the redlines and comments.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">In the interest of time staff did not read the text of the rationale and deliberations but displayed them on screen to be read or via the link to the document.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">The Chair noted that there would not be time to discuss the revised text of Recommendation Guidance 3 & 4 of Task 6, but staff noted that the WG had already had the opportunity to review
the text and that it was accepted with minor typographical (non-substantive) changes.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Some WG members expressed concern that the Task 3-5 working document contained redlines and comments when they thought that the text was already finalized and ready to put out for public
comment.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Some WG members noted that there were issues the WG discussed or should have discussed that were not covered in the rationale or deliberations.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Staff noted that the redlines and comments were included to illustrate the development of the text as summarized in the rationale and deliberations and because in previous iterations of
the document WG had expressed concerns when redlines and comments weren’t included because it was then unclear how the text had been developed.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Staff also noted that when the clean text is circulated in the report format for the WG to review, members will have the opportunity to note any gaps or raise issues that they think should
have been discussed with the appropriate rationale.<u></u><u></u></li></ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Recommendation Guidance 1:<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Noting the discussion around “underserved” and that the deletion of some text resulted in the deletion of the footnote with the definition, which staff will reinsert.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Re: Indicators of Success: The Chair noted new suggested text (shown in brackets) to clarify. No objections from WG members.<u></u><u></u>
<ul type="circle">
<li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black"><b>Indicators of Success:</b> <u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black"><i>Quantitative</i>: Conversion rates proportionate with industry standards for online campaigns and in-person events, [with specific metrics to be determined] in consultation with ICANN
org Communications and applicable contractor(s).<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black"><i>Qualitative</i>: Survey results about quality and clarity of information that are proportionate with industry standards, [with specific metrics to be determined in consultation with
ICANN org Communications and applicable contractor(s).]<u></u><u></u></li></ul>
</li></ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Recommendation Guidance 5: <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Lawrence requested that the WG should discuss the use of “applications” versus “applicants” in this recommendation (see in brackets below).<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Staff noted that the WG had already discussed and agreed to “applicants”, so this would be a new issue and as such it could be raised in public comment.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Lawrence emphasized that it was an important distinction to be discussed and should not have to be raised in public comment.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">The Chair noted that the WG should consider the suggestion in the final review of text and that it would be helpful if the suggestion could be accompanied by rationale for the change.<u></u><u></u></li><li class="m_-3249808852370119082MsoListParagraph" style="color:black">Staff noted that the action would be captured that WG members could comment on the text noting any gaps both in the rationale and deliberations as well as in issue that should have been
discussed by the WG but weren’t.<u></u><u></u></li></ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">Recommendation Guidance 5: Of all successfully delegated gTLD applicants [applications], the goal is that no fewer than 10, or 0.5 percent (.005), of them were supported applicants [applications]<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">Indicators of Success:</span></b><span style="color:black"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">No fewer than 10, or 0.5 percent (.005), of all successfully delegated gTLD applicants [applications] were supported applicants [applications].<br>
<b>Data/Metrics to Measure Success: 0.</b>5 percent (.005) of successfully delegated gTLD applicants [applications] are supported applicants [applications]. Note that this percentage is not in relation to the number of strings applied for, or [rather] the
number of applicants [applications].<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:black">4. AOB<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="font-variant-caps:normal;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:black"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
GNSO-GGP-WG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:GNSO-GGP-WG@icann.org" target="_blank">GNSO-GGP-WG@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ggp-wg" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ggp-wg</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</div></blockquote></div>