<div dir="ltr">Hi Julie<div><br clear="all"><div><div>1. I finally got to listen to the whole recording of the GGP meeting.. and my first comment is that in the last call I attended where we were invited to prepare comments for discussion, I too had supported the intent of the wording of Gabriel's first recommendation. I do not agree that the additional wording did not add anything. In fact, I felt that the addition gave more depth and in fact added "more sense" to our recommendation to ensure that more support was given to enhance understanding by more prospective applicants. </div><div><br></div><div>2. To belabour that point, with regards to raising awareness and engagement I believe that mentoring should also be included as they are all means of SUPPORT which is what we are talking about here. Mentoring here does not necessarily mean a full mentoring programme. When you are trying to raise someone's awareness and to engage them, mentoring in its simplest form by a staff or community member is one way to do this. I certainly do not feel that this is "muddying" the recommendation at all. In fact, it adds to the level of support that some applicants may require. If the IRT believes that it is not appropriate then (as Paul suggested) they or the small team can make that decision. But surely, if the GGP team thinks mentoring is appropriate then why can it not stay?<br></div><div><br></div><div>3. As Lawrence suggested, the outreach recommendation that we (the GGP) would like to support is to ensure that Org provides enough information about the application process, and the purposes of each step along the way, so that ANY applicant can assess for themselves whether they would actually qualify for ICANN support to continue with the actual application process. Information about how an applicant will qualify for applicant support (as set by Org) should be accessible by all applicants.<br></div><div><br></div><div>4. There was concern raised that there may be people who may want to game the system, but the criteria for appIicant support which is to be made by CANN, should clearly identify whether an applicant qualifies or not, and it would be "muddying the waters" to suggest that anyone could benefit financially from the applicant support process. ASP information will stress that the only support that prospective ASP applicants will receive, will only be by way of a discounted application fee and pro-bono support.</div><div><br></div><div>5. In order to forestall questions about where the $$millions that is funding the ASP programme, is going. I am assuming that the funds will go back to ICANN to cover the cost of the discounts that they are offering ASP applicants (if this is not so, then perhaps someone should be telling us!)</div><div><br></div><div>6. I appreciated Tom Barrett's attempt to reword the current statement (supported by Lawrence) to include the GAC's intent to widen the scope of applicants who may apply for applicant support especially if they are from underserved regions - whether they are for-profit or not-for-profit - but the recommendation should point out that the target group is not-for-profits. Again, I feel it is appropriate for us to suggest this and if the IRT or the small group consider one of the groups "ineligible" then it is up to them to withdraw that criteria from the recommendation.<br></div><div><br></div><div>7. Finally, I was taken aback by the Chair's comment in response to the GAC's suggestion to broaden the outreach as "appalling and self-serving" which I did not feel was appropriate, nor was his comment that the "GAC and BC might be able to bully their way...." Such comments were uncalled for in light of the fact that the public comment was requested from these communities and did not deserve such responses from the Chair. </div><div><br></div><div>I hope that my travel arrangements go as planned so that I can be at the next meeting on the 16th (@4am in NZ!!) <br></div><div><br></div><div>Maureen</div><div><br></div><div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br style="color:rgb(80,0,80)"></div></div><span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><img width="96" height="96" src="https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4xnFjHTaFRpG3h7tOgayHbqYNZN3UdxQjUYRyqnVD0OcfsYReG0urX2Y1WOQyQ7_ZWcY0-tWk4"><div><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#5b9bd5">Maureen Hilyard</span></b>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt">Development Consultant </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt">Cook Islands Internet Action Group</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:4.0pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#5b9bd5">Mobile (Cook Islands) </span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt">+682 54641</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#5b9bd5">Mobile (NZ) </span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt">+64 2108192283</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#5b9bd5"><a href="mailto:hilyard@oyster.net.ck" target="_blank">hilyard@oyster.net.ck</a></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt;color:#5b9bd5"><a href="mailto:maureen.hilyard@gmail.com" target="_blank">maureen.hilyard@gmail.com</a>
</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8pt"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/maureen-hilyard-consultant/?original_referer=" target="_blank"><font color="#0000ff">Linkedin</font></a><font color="#5b9bd5"></font></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt">PO Box 156, Avarua, Rarotonga</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:8.0pt">COOK ISLANDS</span></p></div></div></div></div></div>