[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE RESPOND ASAP -- Revised Draft of Letter to Council regarding GAC Communique

[Nat Cohen]

Phil thanks for drafting and to Mason, Mary, George and others for their
contributions.

Looks good to me.

Regards,

Nat


On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:

>  Mason:
>
>
>
> Given that you have the delicate task of interfacing with the GAC, I think
> your proposed minor modifications are fine.
>
>
>
> Best, Philip
>
>
>
> *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>
> *Virtualaw LLC*
>
> *1155 F Street, NW*
>
> *Suite 1050*
>
> *Washington, DC 20004*
>
> *202-559-8597 <202-559-8597>/Direct*
>
> *202-559-8750 <202-559-8750>/Fax*
>
> *202-255-6172 <202-255-6172>/cell*
>
>
>
> *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>
>
>
> *"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
>
>
>
> *From:* Mason Cole [mailto:mason at donuts.co]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 05, 2014 3:50 PM
> *To:* Phil Corwin
> *Cc:* gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE RESPOND ASAP -- Revised Draft
> of Letter to Council regarding GAC Communique
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Phil --
>
>
>
> In my capacity as liaison, let me suggest an edit or two in the bullet
> point in question that might give us better luck in getting some useful
> information from the GAC:
>
>
>
> In regard to the issue of potential amendment of the UDRP – It would be
> instructive to know the GAC’s rationale for opposing any UDRP amendments as
> a means of providing IGOs with access to curative rights. Further, in
> opposing such amendments, does the GAC thus advise the GNSO to preclude any
>  possible change to its "Mutual Jurisdiction" provisions to address
> specific sovereign immunity concerns of IGOs? Finally, if it is the GAC’s
> position that an entirely new curative rights mechanism must be created,  is
> it the GAC's understanding that the protections afforded to qualifying IGOs
> under Article 6ter of the Paris Convention would be the criteria for
> establishing standing under any dispute resolution procedure that may apply
> to IGOs?
>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:56 AM, Phil Corwin wrote:
>
>
>
>  WG members:
>
>
>
> Please find attached a revised draft letter to the GNSO Council regarding
> the LA GAC Communique that reflects our discussion earlier today.
>
>
>
> The only changes are to the second bullet point on page 3.
>
>
>
> PLEASE LET US KNOW IF THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE WITHIN THE NEXT 24
> HOURS. WE WANT TO FORARD THIS LETTER TO THE COUNCILL ASAP TO MAXIMIZE THE
> POSSIBILITY THAT IT WILL BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA FOR ITS MEETING NEXT
> THURSDAY.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Best, Philip
>
>
>
> *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>
> *Virtualaw LLC*
>
> *1155 F Street, NW*
>
> *Suite 1050*
>
> *Washington, DC 20004*
>
> *202-559-8597 <202-559-8597>/Direct*
>
> *202-559-8750 <202-559-8750>/Fax*
>
> *202-255-6172 <202-255-6172>/cell*
>
>
>
> *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>
>
>
> *"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
>
>
>
> <ICANN-IGO_INGO_CRWG-Letter to GNSO
> Council-LA_GAC_Advice-draft#2.docx>_______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
>
>
>
> *Mason Cole *
>
> VP Communications & Industry Relations
>
> Donuts Inc.
>
> *……**……**……**……**……**……*
>
> *……*
>
> *……*
>
> mason at donuts.co
>
> Ofc +1 503 908 7623
>
> Cell +1 503 407 2555
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.5315 / Virus Database: 4189/8462 - Release Date: 10/27/14
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20141105/5e518912/attachment.html>