[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Rescheduling WG call this week (message from Petter and Phil)

Thu Jul 23 22:58:42 UTC 2015

They should make a transcript, too, just like our normal conference
calls. It's much easier/faster to review and reference a written
transcript.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
> Mary/Steve:
>
>
>
> Aside from the time/date, can you inquire whether that is possible?
>
>
>
> Thanks, Philip
>
>
>
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
>
> Virtualaw LLC
>
> 1155 F Street, NW
>
> Suite 1050
>
> Washington, DC 20004
>
> 202-559-8597/Direct
>
> 202-559-8750/Fax
>
> 202-255-6172/cell
>
>
>
> Twitter: @VlawDC
>
>
>
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>
>
>
> From: gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul Tattersfield
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 6:48 PM
> Cc: gnso-igo-ingo-.
>
>
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Rescheduling WG call this week (message
> from Petter and Phil)
>
>
>
> Can ICANN provide our WG with an mp3 of the meeting?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Mike Rodenbaugh <mike at rodenbaugh.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Phil, I was a week behind on email due to vacation.
>
> OK would expand your sentiment such that any agreement on any issue relating
> to any of the GNSO Supermajority advice re any and all IGO issues is suspect
> on process grounds, due to exclusion of GNSO from this 'small group'.
>
> The Board should learn that its out of process policy development
> machinations are not acceptable.
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax +1.415.738.8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com
>
> On Jul 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "Phil Corwin" <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
>
> Mike:
>
>
>
> As I previously replied to Paul, I don’t know if Petter and I can have other
> WG members on this call , seeing as it is envisioned for a small group and
> that will encourage a full and frank discussion.
>
>
>
> But I do think we should work with staff to provide a full report, as well
> as an analysis for how the discussion may impact the task of this WG, as
> soon after the call as practicable -- and schedule our next WG meeting
> shortly thereafter.
>
>
>
> Beyond that, I want all WG members to know that on this morning’s monthly
> GNSO Council call I raised the issue of the OECD letter during the
> concluding portion of the meeting and put Council on notice that this WG was
> stuck in place due to lack of access to expert legal advice -- and that any
> “comprehensive solution” on IGO protections proposed to be put together by
> the Board, GAC and IC ANN staff that addressed the CRP/second level
> issueraised serious process/policy development issues.
>
>
>
> Let’s see what happens on the call and what staff can advise us in the next
> week or two on prospects for securing that expert input. If circumstances
> dictate we may just have to take it upon ourselves to research the sovereign
> immunity scope question.
>
>
>
> Finally, in advance of the call – and we are awaiting word on when that will
> take place – it might be useful if WG members came together on a few points
> that they want Petter and I to emphasize when we engage in that discussion.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>
>
> Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
>
> Virtualaw LLC
>
> 1155 F Street, NW
>
> Suite 1050
>
> Washington, DC 20004
>
> 202-559-8597/Direct
>
> 202-559-8750/Fax
>
> 202-255-6172/cell
>
>
>
> Twitter: @VlawDC
>
>
>
> "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
>
>
>
> From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike at rodenbaugh.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:10 PM
> To: Paul at law.es ZIMBRA
> Cc: Phil Corwin; Petter Rindforth (petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu);
> gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Rescheduling WG call this week (message
> from Petter and Phil)
>
>
>
> Me too, thanks.
>
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
>
> RODENBAUGH LAW
>
> tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
>
> http://rodenbaugh.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Paul at law.es ZIMBRA <paul at law.es> wrote:
>
> Phil, I would very much like to be able to listen to this call or otherwise
> participate to the extent you feel appropriate.
>
> Paul Keating
>
>
> On 21 Jul 2015, at 3:15 am, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:
>
> [Sending the email below on behalf of Petter Rindforth and Philip Corwin, WG
> co-chairs]
>
>
>
> Dear WG members,
>
>
>
> Please be informed that after consultation with ICANN staff we have decided
> to reschedule our Working Group meeting, originally planned for this
> Wednesday 22 July, to end-July or early August. We are informed that the
> “small group” meeting between representatives of the IGO coalition and ICANN
> Board members was a positive one, and that an updated proposal is likely to
> be forwarded to the GAC and the GNSO for their review and action by
> September. This is in line with the GAC’s Buenos Aires Communique and the
> objectives of the “small group” process when it was formed to discuss the
> initial March 2014 proposal from the Board’s New gTLD Program Committee
> (NGPC). The IGO coalition and Board are discussing issues that extend beyond
> but are related to our work.
>
>
>
> With the aim to facilitate further progress of the policy development
> process, and to take into account the context of our work, which includes
> the need to resolve the outstanding inconsistencies between the GNSO’s
> initial policy recommendations on so-called “preventative” protections and
> GAC advice received on the topic, we plan to hold a call very soon, along
> with Jonathan Robinson as GNSO Chair, Thomas Rickert as chair of the
> original GNSO PDP on IGO protections, and Mason as the GAC-GNSO liaison,
> with Chris Disspain (Board/NGPC member) and Thomas Schneider (GAC Chair)
> within the coming week. The aim of the call is for us to receive a
> first-hand update on the work of the “small group” and discuss the likely
> progress within the GNSO, GAC and Board on the overall topic of IGO
> protections, as well as how this WG relates to the larger picture.  As such,
> we believe that it would be most effective and productive if we were to have
> our next WG meeting following this call.
>
>
>
> We will provide more details and a tentative time for the next WG call as
> soon as possible.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Petter and Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.6037 / Virus Database: 4392/10258 - Release Date: 07/18/15
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.6037 / Virus Database: 4392/10258 - Release Date: 07/18/15
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp