[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] VOTING - Re: PLEASE READ: Deadline for proposals and agenda for Working Group meeting this week

[Paul Keating]

I agree with this suggestion.

I further suggest that the consensus decision be undertaken as a poll so
that all members can participate even if they are not able to attend the
call personally.

Thank you,

Paul Keating

From:  Gnso-igo-ingo-crp <gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
Zak Muscovitch <zak at muscovitch.com>
Date:  Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 4:30 PM
To:  Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>, <gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: Deadline for proposals and
agenda for Working Group meeting this week

> Dear All,
>  
> With regards to the Consensus Call, I wonder if it is preferable to have a
> Œranked ballot¹ if possible, so that members can rank their choices in order
> of preference. In this manner the vote will reflect the choice that is the
> most agreeable to the most people.
>  
> Ranked voting is considered a more accurate measure of voter sentiment than
> the typical 'plurality' voting, especially when there are more than two
> options, and especially when some of the options share similarities while
> others are quite dissimilar.  Ranked voting is in use by Australia, by
> Canadian political parties, by the Oscars for picking the Best Picture winner,
> by San Francisco for picking it mayor and now by Maine for picking most of its
> elected officials
> (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/03/us/maine-ranked-choice-voting.html
> <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/03/us/maine-ranked-choice-voting.html> ).
> More information about ranked ballots is available here:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting> .
>  
>  
> Zak
>  
>  
> 
> From: Gnso-igo-ingo-crp [mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf
> Of Mary Wong
> Sent: December-12-17 4:47 PM
> To: gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: Deadline for proposals and agenda
> for Working Group meeting this week
>  
> 
> SENT ON BEHALF OF PHIL AND PETTER (WORKING GROUP CO-CHAIRS)
>  
> Dear Working Group members,
>  
> We are moving toward concluding our deliberations on the topic of whether (and
> if so, what) recommendation to make to deal with the situation where the
> losing respondent files a claim in a national court but the IGO succeeds in
> claiming immunity from the jurisdiction of that court. With thanks to Zak for
> timely submitting proposed text on a new option for this topic, which we will
> consider on our next call this Thursday, we request that if any Working Group
> member has any proposed text for consideration, please submit the actual text
> you are proposing for Working Group consideration no later than one hour
> before the Thursday call (i.e. 1600 UTC on 14 December). This will be the
> deadline for submission of any options to be included in any further polling
> of the WG for support or opposition.
>  
> The proposed agenda for the call this Thursday is as follows:
> 1. Roll call/updates to Statements of Interest
> 2. Co-Chairs¹ recap of discussion with Nominet legal counsel on the Nominet
> appeal process
> 3. Review of text proposed by Zak for a new option (in the context of a
> possible Recommendation #3)
> 4. Presentation of Co-Chairs¹ proposal for concluding deliberations on
> Recommendation #3 and conducting the Working Group Consensus Call for all
> Recommendations and options
> 5. Scheduling the next meeting
>  
> We hope that as many Working Group members as possible can attend the call
> this week, as we hope to wrap up discussions on this one remaining possible
> recommendation, and proceed with the formal Consensus Call before the end of
> this year.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Phil and Petter
>  
> _______________________________________________ Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20171213/3b7cffcf/attachment-0001.html>