[Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and ContinuedConsensus Call on Proposed Recommendations

[Heather Forrest]

Thanks very much, Berry, for getting the WG to this stage.

My input below:

   - I agree with the consensus designations as stated.
   - I have no objection to Chuck's proposal that the comment period be
   extended; for consistency and practicality's sake this is sensible in my
   view.
   - In the final paragraph on page 3: "It is important to note that the
   scope of the work of this Reconvened WG did not extend..." I suggest adding
   for absolute clarity: "It is important to note that the scope of the work
   of this Reconvened WG did not, per the GNSO Council motion of [DATE],
   extend"....
   - I envision a situation where it is unclear whether Recommendation 6
   applies on its own, or Recommendation 5 and 6 both apply. I have included
   this question as a comment in the document.
   - The intention and meaning of the following statement on page 13 isn't
   clear to me: "The Reconvened WG also understands that the GAC is the
   authoritative channel for any proposed changes that are to be made to the
   reservation list."
   - I have suggested some minor edits in the document attached, mainly for
   clarity.

Best wishes to all,

Heather



On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:18 AM, <christopher.lamb17 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Berry,
>
> As you know from an earlier e-mail to you and Stephane I’m comfortable but
> I had a few questions about National Societies yet to enter the Movement
> but on the membership path which I hope will be taken into account.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Chris
>
> *From:* mail at berrycobb.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2018 13:09
> *To:* gnso-igo-ingo at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-igo-ingo] ACTION REQUIRED - Reconvened WG and
> ContinuedConsensus Call on Proposed Recommendations
>
>
> Hi All
>
>
>
> Please find attached the proposed Initial Report of the Reconvened WG.
> This is the full report that includes required sections of Executive
> Summary, Background, and Deliberations of the WG along with the proposed
> recommendations that were sent to the WG last week in preparation for that
> meeting.  Like prior versions of the draft recommendations, Thomas has
> maintained a preliminary consensus level of “full consensus” for the six
> recommendations.
>
>
>
> The task for members as a part of the continued consensus call is to
> announce *any objections* to the currently assigned consensus level by *19
> June 2018 at 23:59 UTC*.  Absent any objections, the Initial report will
> be prepared for a 30-day public comment proceeding.  Thomas is prepared to
> have this extended to the normal 40 days upon presentation to the GNSO
> Council of the Reconvened WG’s status at ICANN62.
>
>
>
> In addition to submission of objections, if any, members are also
> instructed to provide any feedback or proposed edits to this draft report.
> Track changes are enabled.  You can make your suggested edits in the Word
> doc and return back to me for import into the master document.  Written
> suggestions are also welcome on the mailing list, and I can post the
> changes on your behalf in to the master.
>
>
>
> Lastly, we still have two outstanding items to resolves as it relates to
> the variant principles and the definitive list.  Please send along your
> support or objection as well.
>
> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/2018-June/000156.html
>
>
>
> *Reconvened WG’s Timeline:*
>
> *07 June – complete *
>
> *Next meeting of the Reconvened WG (start of consensus call)*
>
> *14 June – complete*
>
> *Reconvened WG meeting not required*
>
> 18-21 June
>
> Start of Public Comment Period
>
> 23-28 June
>
> ICANN62*
>
> 18 July
>
> Close of Comment Period (30 days per Council resolution)**
>
> 19 July
>
> Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report
>
> 26 July
>
> Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report
>
> 28 July
>
> Close of Comment Period (40 days per standard)
>
> 02 August
>
> Reconvened WG meeting to review comments and prepare Final Report
>
> 06 August
>
> GNSO Council’s Documents and Motion deadline / Send Final Report
>
> 16 August
>
> GNSO Council meeting
>
> * No planned session, but an update will be provided to the GNSO Council.
>
> ** Note that the Council resolution that kicked off this effort mentions a
> (30) day public comment period.  However, the standard is (40) days.
> Thomas will ask the Council at ICANN62 whether an extension to 40 days is
> warranted.
>
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> B
>
>
>
> Berry A. Cobb
>
> 720.839.5735
>
> mail at berrycobb.com
>
> @berrycobb
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/attachments/20180614/f80eb581/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gnso-IGO-INGO-Reconvened-initial-report-20180612_HF.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 191048 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo/attachments/20180614/f80eb581/gnso-IGO-INGO-Reconvened-initial-report-20180612_HF-0001.docx>