[gnso-igo-wt] Follow up from IGO Work Track Team Meeting | Monday, 09 August 2021 at 15:00 UTC
mary.wong at icann.org
Wed Aug 11 22:59:44 UTC 2021
Staff had the action item from this Monday’s meeting to circulate the current language (including options under consideration) for the proposed definition of “IGO Complainant” and the reference to a court’s declining to assume jurisdiction in a case filed by a losing registrant. Please note that the following is the specific text relating only to these two topics and does not represent the full proposal to which the language may relate. For your convenience, we have highlighted the text that was discussed on Monday’s call in yellow.
1. ‘IGO Complainant’ refers to:
(a) an international organization established by a treaty and which possesses international legal personality; or
(b) an ‘Intergovernmental organization’ having received a standing invitation to participate as an observer in the sessions and the work of the United Nations General Assembly; [including the work of its standing committees and any of its Specialized Agencies (as the case may be)] or
(c) a distinct entity, organ or program of the United Nations.
2. [As provided in Paragraph 5(k) of the UDRP, the relevant registrar shall wait ten (10) business days (as observed in the location of its principal office) before implementing a UDRP [or URS] panel decision rendered in the IGO Complainant’s favor, and will stay implementation if, within that period, it receives official documentation that the registrant has initiated proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction. In the event that the relevant court in such judicial proceeding declines to assume jurisdiction on the basis that the IGO Complainant is immune from the court’s jurisdiction (with the result that the court is unable to consider the case on its merits), the registrant shall have the option to agree to submit the dispute to binding arbitration within [add time frame]. The registrar shall continue to stay implementation until it receives confirmation from at least one of the parties that they will not be proceeding to arbitration or official documentation concerning the outcome of an arbitration or other satisfactory evidence of a settlement or other final resolution of the dispute.]
Thanks and cheers
Steve, Berry and Mary
From: gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Bisland via gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt at icann.org>
Reply-To: Julie Bisland <julie.bisland at icann.org>
Date: Monday, August 9, 2021 at 12:50 PM
To: "gnso-igo-wt at icann.org" <gnso-igo-wt at icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-igo-wt] Post Call | IGO Work Track Team Meeting | Monday, 09 August 2021 at 15:00 UTC
All recordings for the IGO Work Track Team Meeting call held on Monday, 09 August 2021 at 15:00 UTC can be found on the agenda wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/woUZCg> (attendance included) and the GNSO Master Calendar [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar__;!!PtGJab4!p738M6wD4Wh-RzG5SEvyX62fqwpBvxbB58qgQ0mIgPEIw3136vSeDcBbOlMnhilMVilRg-4$>.
* Attendance (please let me know if your name has been left off the attendance list)
* Audio recording
* Zoom Chat
* Zoom recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript)
As a reminder only members and alternates can join the call as a panelist, observers can join as an attendee to listen.
For additional information, you may consult the mailing list archives <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-wt/> and the main wiki page<https://community.icann.org/display/GNSOIWT>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gnso-igo-wt