[gnso-igo-wt] [Ext] RE: EPDP_SCRP_IGO - Proposed Text for Recommendation #2

[Berry Cobb]

Hi All,

One slight edit. The word “generally” was added to the proposal below to make the sentence “….generally consistent….”.  You will see it highlighted below in red.

Thank you.

B


Berry Cobb
Policy Development - Portfolio Manager
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
berry.cobb at icann.org


From: "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at taftlaw.com>
Date: Monday, November 15, 2021 at 11:34
To: Berry Cobb <Berry.Cobb at icann.org>, Terri Agnew via gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] RE: EPDP_SCRP_IGO - Proposed Text for Recommendation #2

Thanks Berry.  Your iteration far below makes sense to me.

Best,
Paul




This message may contain information that is attorney-client privileged, attorney work product or otherwise confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, use and disclosure of this message are prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
From: gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Berry Cobb via gnso-igo-wt
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 10:32 AM
To: Terri Agnew via gnso-igo-wt <gnso-igo-wt at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-igo-wt] EPDP_SCRP_IGO - Proposed Text for Recommendation #2

[EXTERNAL MESSAGE]
Dear All,

Per the Chair’s request today, please see below the proposed text on Recommendation #2 based on review of the public comments. Absent of any objection by 19 Nov 2021 at 23:59, the leadership team will consider this proposal stable.



Initial Report - Recommendation #2: Cumulative Effect of Recommendations #3, #4, #5 & #6
If the GNSO Council approves the recommendations set out below in Recommendations #3, #4, #5 and #6, then the EPDP team recommends that the original Recommendation #5 from the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protections PDP be rejected.



PROPOSAL:

  *   Delete Recommendation #2 in its entirety and renumber Recommendations #3, #4, #5 & #6 accordingly.
  *   Add specific text to the opening portion of the Recommendations section of the Final Report (currently Section 2 of the Initial Report) as follows:

“The GNSO Council voted not to approve the original Recommendation #5 from the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP. The EPDP Team’s collective understanding is that the GNSO Council thereby rejected the original Recommendation #5 and, instead, tasked the RPM Phase 1 PDP Working Group to develop a policy solution for the problem that the original Recommendation #5 was intended to solve and that would be generally consistent with Recommendations #1 - #4 from that PDP. The EPDP Team believes that its final recommendations (below) address the issues raised by IGOs’ jurisdictional immunity in relation to court proceedings following a UDRP or URS decision. As such, the EPDP Team recommends that the GNSO Council approve the following final [Recommendations #3 - #5] from this EPDP.”




Thank you.

B

Berry Cobb
GNSO Policy Consultant
Principal | BAC in Black Consulting [bacinblack.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/bacinblack.com/__;!!PtGJab4!rtqwi07fUv3NGPRjTvjaAnXGDFh95h_mn8pZmzg1iaxnQOTzDv6MIpFvGZ4YBzU3mI9ee7Q$>
Mob: +1 (720) 839-5735
[Image removed by sender.][twitter.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/twitter.com/berrycobb__;!!PtGJab4!rtqwi07fUv3NGPRjTvjaAnXGDFh95h_mn8pZmzg1iaxnQOTzDv6MIpFvGZ4YBzU3x7gQUIw$>
[Image removed by sender.][linkedin.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.linkedin.com/in/berrycobb/__;!!PtGJab4!rtqwi07fUv3NGPRjTvjaAnXGDFh95h_mn8pZmzg1iaxnQOTzDv6MIpFvGZ4YBzU3CCke7lo$>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-wt/attachments/20211115/c097a3a9/attachment.html>