<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Dear all,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Another personal view,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">From an end-user perspective, the most important issue at stake here is end-user confusion, with potentially fatal consequenses, in case off fraudulent use of an IGO acronym. A clear and rapid mechanism needs to be set up, at long last, to deal
with such situations. Until Monday, it seemed that we were advancing towards a pragmatic solution that all parties could live with and that would recognize fundamental facts if life like the status of intergovernmental organisations. </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">As a non-lawyer, I might not see all the fine points, but I wonder why a losing registrant would want to spend money and effort just in order to be told by a court that an IGO has immunity, instead of following the procedure outlined in the proposed
Recommendation 2. Nevertheless, I hope that work continues to reconcile Jay’s bullet #3 (which I think refers to Option 3 for Resolution 5, something that unfortunately was rejected by the<font face="Arial" class=""> original IGO/INGO PDP Working Group)
and our proposed Rec 2. We can’t afford to kick the can down the road to yet another PDP.</font></div>
<div class=""><font face="Arial" class=""><br class="">
</font></div>
<div class=""><font face="Arial" class="">Best,</font></div>
<div class=""><font face="Arial" class=""><br class="">
</font></div>
<div class=""><font face="Arial" class="">Yrjö</font></div>
<div class=""><font face="Arial" class=""><br class="">
</font></div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><font face="Arial" class=""><br class="">
</font></div>
<div class=""><font face="Arial" class=""><br class="">
</font></div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 6. Aug 2021, at 21.27, David Satola via gnso-igo-wt <<a href="mailto:gnso-igo-wt@icann.org" class="">gnso-igo-wt@icann.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class=""><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13.333333015441895px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">without
recourse to address abuse of their identifiers in the DNS, whereby not only IGOs, but potentially defrauded Internet users/private citizens pay the price</span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>