From marika.konings at icann.org Thu Apr 4 02:46:14 2013 From: marika.konings at icann.org (Marika Konings) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:46:14 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Information from ICANN's Contractual Compliance Department Message-ID: Dear All, Please find attached for your review the information requested from ICANN's Contractual Compliance Department. Carlos Alvarez, Senior Manager, Contractual Compliance, will be available to participate in the IRTP Part D Face-to-Face meeting in Beijing to answer any questions you may have. With best regards, Marika -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IRTP Part D WG - Report - ICANN Contractual Compliance - 4-3-13.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 475684 bytes Desc: IRTP Part D WG - Report - ICANN Contractual Compliance - 4-3-13.pdf URL: From jbladel at godaddy.com Mon Apr 15 15:04:02 2013 From: jbladel at godaddy.com (James M. Bladel) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:04:02 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] No Meeting Apr 15 Message-ID: <20130415080402.9c1b16d3983f34082b49b9baf8cec04a.9b5804e40d.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From michele at blacknight.com Mon Apr 15 15:07:37 2013 From: michele at blacknight.com (Michele Neylon :: Blacknight) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:07:37 +0000 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] No Meeting Apr 15 In-Reply-To: <20130415150403.B20925A402A@merlin.blacknight.ie> References: <20130415150403.B20925A402A@merlin.blacknight.ie> Message-ID: <63A99978-A189-4C85-A860-E5963129CC03@blacknight.com> Yay! Mr. Michele Neylon Blacknight http://Blacknight.tel Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity On 15 Apr 2013, at 16:05, "James M. Bladel" > wrote: Hi folks: In case this wasn't clear, we will NOT have a meeting today (Apr 15) due to several folks still returning from China. Thanks! J. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kdorrain at adrforum.com Mon Apr 15 15:16:31 2013 From: kdorrain at adrforum.com (Dorrain, Kristine) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:16:31 +0000 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] No Meeting Apr 15 In-Reply-To: <63A99978-A189-4C85-A860-E5963129CC03@blacknight.com> References: <20130415150403.B20925A402A@merlin.blacknight.ie> <63A99978-A189-4C85-A860-E5963129CC03@blacknight.com> Message-ID: Thanks for the email. I was trying to get on the Adobe room and was wondering if I had the wrong time again due to daylight savings time in Minnesota. :) Kristine From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Michele Neylon :: Blacknight Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:08 AM To: James M. Bladel Cc: IRTP-D Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] No Meeting Apr 15 Yay! Mr. Michele Neylon Blacknight http://Blacknight.tel Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity On 15 Apr 2013, at 16:05, "James M. Bladel" > wrote: Hi folks: In case this wasn't clear, we will NOT have a meeting today (Apr 15) due to several folks still returning from China. Thanks! J. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Tue Apr 16 18:51:33 2013 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:51:33 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Meeting Invitation: IRTP D WG call on Monday 22 April 2013 Message-ID: Dear all, The next Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Monday 22 April 2013 at 15:00 UTC Please note new time adjusted to Daylight Saving Time 08:00 PST, 11:00 EST, 17:00 CET, 01:00 (+1 day) Sydney Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/irtppartd/ For those of you using Adobe Connect for the first time, please find a short introduction video here: https://admin.adobe.acrobat.com/_a227210/participatemeeting/ The link to the IRTP Part D Working Group Wiki pages: https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg Mailing list archives: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. ____________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: IRTP For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 06-800-12755 INDIA 000-800-852-1268 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone. ---------------------------- Thank you, Best regards, Julia Charvolen For GNSO Secretariat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From julia.charvolen at icann.org Thu Apr 18 11:36:47 2013 From: julia.charvolen at icann.org (Julia Charvolen) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:36:47 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Meeting Invitation: IRTP D WG call on Monday 22 April 2013 Message-ID: Dear all, The next Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Monday 22 April 2013 at 15:00 UTC Please note new time adjusted to Daylight Saving Time 08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 17:00 CET, 01:00 (+1 day) Sydney Adobe Connect WITH AUDIO enabled: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/irtppartd/ For those of you using the Adobe Connect audio, you may do so by activating your computer microphone via the Adobe room (Using a headset is preferable here). Make sure your speakers and microphone are not on mute. - Select the TELEPHONE ICON at the top of the AC toolbar and choose CONNECT MY AUDIO (only option). - Select USING COMPUTER twice - Select ALLOW access to the ICANN adobe room - the TELEPHONE ICON at the top of the toolbar should then have changed into a MICROPHONE ICON - You may click on this MICROPHONE ICON to mute yourself (Icon will then have a line through it) and to unmute yourself (Line disappears) Participants must ALWAYS have their microphone or telephone on MUTE as default setting. You are requested to RAISE YOUR HAND if you wish to participate to avoid disruption. The link to the IRTP Part D Working Group Wiki pages: https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg Mailing list archives: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ The dial-in details are below ? please let me know if you require a dial-out. ____________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: IRTP For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 06-800-12755 INDIA 000-800-852-1268 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone. ---------------------------- Thank you, Best regards, Julia Charvolen For GNSO Secretariat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Welcome to the Adobe connect room .pptx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation Size: 35302 bytes Desc: Welcome to the Adobe connect room .pptx URL: From Lars.hoffmann at icann.org Thu Apr 18 13:54:37 2013 From: Lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars HOFFMANN) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:54:37 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Proposed agenda for IRTP Part D Working Group Message-ID: Dear all, Please find below the proposed draft agenda for our next meeting, Monday 22 April 15.00 UTC - http://tinyurl.com/cn9vbst. Please note that from now on audio will be enabled in Adobe Connect meaning that you do not require an additional phone dial-in (which remains available however). Best wishes, Lars --- Proposed Draft Agenda for IRTP Part D WG Meeting, Monday 22 April 2013, 15.00 UTC 1. Roll Call / SOI Updates 2. Review of community input (if any) 3. Continue to assess Charter questions and discuss relevant issues 4. TDRP Discussion 5. Next steps / confirm next meeting -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Mon Apr 22 18:30:08 2013 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:30:08 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] MP3 IRTP Part D Working Group - Monday 22 April 2013 at 15:00 UTC Message-ID: Dear All, The next Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group teleconference will be held on Monday 29th April 2013. Please find the MP3 recording for the IRTP Part D Working Group call held on Monday 22 March 2013 at 16:00 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-irtp-d-20130422-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#apr The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: James Bladel - RrSG Chris Chaplow - CBUC Kristine Dorrain - NAF Kevin Erdman - IPC Barbara Knight - RySG Bob Mountain - RySG Mikey O'Connor - ISPCP Holly Raiche - ALAC Paul Diaz - RySG Alan Greenberg - ALAC Jill Titzer - RrSG Graeme Bunton - RrSG Oliver Hope - RrSG Simonetta Batteiger - RrSG Apologies: none ICANN staff: Marika Konings Lars Hoffman Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Peregrine For GNSO Secretariat Adobe Chat Transcript for Monday 22 April 2013: Lars Hoffmann:Welcome to the IRTP Part D Working Group meeting, Monday 22 April 2013 Alan Greenberg:James: train analogies today? Mike O'Connor:submarines from here. endless rain Nathalie Peregrine:please all mute mikes on computers if audio enabled AC room Nathalie Peregrine:Paul Diaz has just joined the call Nathalie Peregrine:Simonetta has joined the AC room Nathalie Peregrine:Kevin Erdman has joined the call Nathalie Peregrine:Oliver Hope has just joined the room Alan Greenberg:Call ends early! Paul Diaz (Public Interest Registry):James is making you an offer you can't refuse, Mikey ;-) Mike O'Connor:todays's just a bad day. my phone just dropped. Mike O'Connor:back soon Simonetta:As a product person I'm thinking about this the following way: the TDRP is kind of the spec set, which explains the business logic, while there seems to be a "user interface" issue with how to interact with it... Simonetta:so you will always need your specs or your rule set, but you might have to tweak the frontend... Mike O'Connor:not yet Simonetta:we might need to categorize the complaints into the main issues Mike O'Connor:bah. i'm going to go down hard real soon now. power failure AND phone failure. sorry -- see you next week Simonetta:and then look if those are due to a lack of policy or a lack of process on how to apply the policy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Lars.hoffmann at icann.org Tue Apr 23 08:25:05 2013 From: Lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars HOFFMANN) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:25:05 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part D Policy Development Process _BC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear all, Please find attached the input by the Business Community ? it is so far the only response that we have received. Best wishes, Lars From: Glen de Saint G?ry Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 9:55 AM To: Lars Hoffmann Cc: Marika Konings , "gnso-secs at icann.org" Subject: FW: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part D Policy Development Process _BC Dear Chris, Thank you and the BC policy group for your comments . These are being forwarded to the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part D Policy Development Process Working Group Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint G?ry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org From: Chris Chaplow [mailto:chris at andalucia.com] Sent: lundi 22 avril 2013 23:09 To: gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org Subject: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part D Policy Development Process _BC Dear Glen, Hope you are well. Here is BC comment for IRTP-D Apologies it is a late submission. Best Chris Chaplow Managing Director Andalucia.com S.L. Avenida del Carmen 9 Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo 1? Planta, Oficina 30 Estepona, 29680 Malaga, Spain Tel: + (34) 952 897 865 Fax: + (34) 952 897 874 E-mail: chris at andalucia.com Web: www.andalucia.com Information about Andalucia, Spain. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IRTPPartDInput-BC.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 21079 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Tue Apr 23 15:36:03 2013 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:36:03 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Updated: MP3 IRTP Part D Working Group - Monday 22 April 2013 at 15:00 UTC Message-ID: Dear All, The next Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group teleconference will be held on Monday 29th April 2013. Please find the MP3 recording for the IRTP Part D Working Group call held on Monday 22 March 2013 at 16:00 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-irtp-d-20130422-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#apr The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: James Bladel - RrSG Chris Chaplow - CBUC Kristine Dorrain - NAF Kevin Erdman - IPC Barbara Knight - RySG Bob Mountain - RySG Mikey O'Connor - ISPCP Holly Raiche - ALAC Paul Diaz - RySG Alan Greenberg - ALAC Jill Titzer - RrSG Graeme Bunton - RrSG Oliver Hope - RrSG Simonetta Batteiger - RrSG Apologies: Avri Doria ICANN staff: Marika Konings Lars Hoffman Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Peregrine For GNSO Secretariat Adobe Chat Transcript for Monday 22 April 2013: Lars Hoffmann:Welcome to the IRTP Part D Working Group meeting, Monday 22 April 2013 Alan Greenberg:James: train analogies today? Mike O'Connor:submarines from here. endless rain Nathalie Peregrine:please all mute mikes on computers if audio enabled AC room Nathalie Peregrine:Paul Diaz has just joined the call Nathalie Peregrine:Simonetta has joined the AC room Nathalie Peregrine:Kevin Erdman has joined the call Nathalie Peregrine:Oliver Hope has just joined the room Alan Greenberg:Call ends early! Paul Diaz (Public Interest Registry):James is making you an offer you can't refuse, Mikey ;-) Mike O'Connor:todays's just a bad day. my phone just dropped. Mike O'Connor:back soon Simonetta:As a product person I'm thinking about this the following way: the TDRP is kind of the spec set, which explains the business logic, while there seems to be a "user interface" issue with how to interact with it... Simonetta:so you will always need your specs or your rule set, but you might have to tweak the frontend... Mike O'Connor:not yet Simonetta:we might need to categorize the complaints into the main issues Mike O'Connor:bah. i'm going to go down hard real soon now. power failure AND phone failure. sorry -- see you next week Simonetta:and then look if those are due to a lack of policy or a lack of process on how to apply the policy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Wed Apr 24 09:33:55 2013 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:33:55 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Meeting Invitation: IRTP D WG call on Monday 29 April 2013 Message-ID: Dear all, The next Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Monday 29 April 2013 at 15:00 UTC Please note new time adjusted to Daylight Saving Time 08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 17:00 CET, 01:00 (+1 day) Sydney Adobe Connect WITH AUDIO enabled: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/irtppartd/ For those of you using the Adobe Connect audio, you may do so by activating your computer microphone via the Adobe room (Using a headset is preferable here). Make sure your speakers and microphone are not on mute. - Select the TELEPHONE ICON at the top of the AC toolbar and choose CONNECT MY AUDIO (only option). - Select USING COMPUTER twice - Select ALLOW access to the ICANN adobe room - the TELEPHONE ICON at the top of the toolbar should then have changed into a MICROPHONE ICON - You may click on this MICROPHONE ICON to mute yourself (Icon will then have a line through it) and to unmute yourself (Line disappears) Participants must ALWAYS have their microphone or telephone on MUTE as default setting. You are requested to RAISE YOUR HAND if you wish to participate to avoid disruption. The link to the IRTP Part D Working Group Wiki pages: https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg Mailing list archives: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. ____________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: IRTP For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 06-800-12755 INDIA 000-800-852-1268 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone. ---------------------------- Thank you, Best regards, Nathalie Peregrine For GNSO Secretariat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Lars.hoffmann at icann.org Thu Apr 25 14:24:53 2013 From: Lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars HOFFMANN) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 07:24:53 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Draft Agenda Message-ID: Dear all, In preparation of Monday's meeting, please find below the proposed draft agenda. I have also attached the input from the BC and the submitted by the RySG during the public comment period of the Draft Issue Report - the RySG has indicated that they will not provide additional input but have provided answers to the Charter questions in their initial response. No other comments were received up to this point. Best wishes, Lars --- Proposed Draft Agenda for IRTP Part D WG meeting, Monday 29 April 2013 > 1. Roll Call / SOI > 2. Continued review of TDRP > 3. Review Community input (attached) > 4. Start review other Charter questions (if time permits) > 5. Confirm next steps / next meeting -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Public comment review tool - 24 April.doc Type: application/msword Size: 74752 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Lars.hoffmann at icann.org Thu Apr 25 15:16:03 2013 From: Lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars HOFFMANN) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:16:03 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Charter Question e) Message-ID: Dear all, The proposed 2013 RAA (currently open for public comment ) includes a refinement of ICANN?s powers to suspend and terminate Registrars agreements. In light of our IRTP Part D Charter question e), this might be of relevance to the Group?s work: ?Whether existing penalties for policy violations are sufficient or if additional provisions/penalties for specific violations should be added into the policy? It may be worth noting that the Charter question was drafted at the time of the 2001 RAA which ? see also attachment ? did not have any other sanctioning options than for ICANN to terminate the agreement with an offending Registrar. The 2009 RAA provided additional remedies (suspension) and this is now further refined in 2013. Though the suspension and termination powers have not been significantly altered I have copied the relevant section into a table and bold-ed the changes from the 2009 to 2013 Agreement ? see attachment.The complete documents are of course available online: 2001 RAA ; 2009 RAA ; proposed 2013 RAA . Please note that some of the language may appear different but the underlying intent seems to remain the same (in Marika and my non-lawyer eyes). Only the language in bold is either new or mark an expansion of existing provisions. If you have any further questions we are of course happy to relay them to the ICANN legal team or else you just might want to add this material to your discussion of the relevant Charter question e). Many thanks and best wishes, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Comparison_LH.xls Type: application/x-msexcel Size: 47104 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Fri Apr 26 07:32:03 2013 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:32:03 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] REMINDER: Meeting Invitation: IRTP D WG call on Monday 29 April 2013 Message-ID: Dear all, The next Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group teleconference is scheduled for Monday 29 April 2013 at 15:00 UTC Please note new time adjusted to Daylight Saving Time 08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 17:00 CET, 01:00 (+1 day) Sydney Adobe Connect WITH AUDIO enabled: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/irtppartd/ For those of you using the Adobe Connect audio, you may do so by activating your computer microphone via the Adobe room (Using a headset is preferable here). Make sure your speakers and microphone are not on mute. - Select the TELEPHONE ICON at the top of the AC toolbar and choose CONNECT MY AUDIO (only option). - Select USING COMPUTER twice - Select ALLOW access to the ICANN adobe room - the TELEPHONE ICON at the top of the toolbar should then have changed into a MICROPHONE ICON - You may click on this MICROPHONE ICON to mute yourself (Icon will then have a line through it) and to unmute yourself (Line disappears) Participants must ALWAYS have their microphone or telephone on MUTE as default setting. You are requested to RAISE YOUR HAND if you wish to participate to avoid disruption. The link to the IRTP Part D Working Group Wiki pages: https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg Mailing list archives: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. ____________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: IRTP For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers: Country Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 06-800-12755 INDIA 000-800-852-1268 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone. ---------------------------- Thank you, Best regards, Nathalie Peregrine For GNSO Secretariat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Lars.hoffmann at icann.org Fri Apr 26 07:59:14 2013 From: Lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:59:14 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] TDRP stats Message-ID: Dear all, In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month ? both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013. You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further. Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that: of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013 224 concerned .com (94.3%) 11 concerned .net (4.8%) 2 concerned .pro (0.9%) For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports With best wishes from rainy Brussels, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Lars.hoffmann at icann.org Fri Apr 26 08:01:26 2013 From: Lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 01:01:26 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet ? Apologies, Lars From: Lars Hoffmann Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" Subject: TDRP stats Dear all, In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month ? both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013. You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further. Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that: of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013 224 concerned .com (94.3%) 11 concerned .net (4.8%) 2 concerned .pro (0.9%) For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports With best wishes from rainy Brussels, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CombinesTDRPdata.xls Type: application/x-msexcel Size: 93184 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From BKnight at verisign.com Fri Apr 26 13:23:51 2013 From: BKnight at verisign.com (Knight, Barbara) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:23:51 +0000 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] RE: TDRP stats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7746E0B70F47DB448101E1DA28BCFF41357671B1@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Lars, Thank you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the Transfers disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same because for each case, there is a "winning" registrar and a "losing registrar". Likewise, the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases should actually be divided by 2 as these numbers also would have two registrars that were parties to the case and neither prevailed. Hope this helps to explain the numbers a bit. Thank you. Barbara Knight Director of Registry Compliance bknight at Verisign.com m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com [Description: Verisign(tm)] From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01 AM To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet ... Apologies, Lars From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" > Subject: TDRP stats Dear all, In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month - both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013. You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further. Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that: of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013 224 concerned .com (94.3%) 11 concerned .net (4.8%) 2 concerned .pro (0.9%) For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports With best wishes from rainy Brussels, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1593 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3105 bytes Desc: image004.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2186 bytes Desc: image005.jpg URL: From Lars.hoffmann at icann.org Fri Apr 26 14:56:54 2013 From: Lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:56:54 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats In-Reply-To: <7746E0B70F47DB448101E1DA28BCFF41357671B1@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: Dear Barbara, Thank you for the quick reply and useful information. This means then that the total number of cases was 152 in the period between October 2009 and March 2013. Breaking down as follows: .com = 142 (93.4%) .net = 8 (5.3%) .pro = 2 (1.3%) Best wishes, Lars From: , Barbara Knight Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 15:23 PM To: Lars Hoffmann , "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" Subject: RE: TDRP stats Lars, Thank you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the Transfers disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same because for each case, there is a ?winning? registrar and a ?losing registrar?. Likewise, the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases should actually be divided by 2 as these numbers also would have two registrars that were parties to the case and neither prevailed. Hope this helps to explain the numbers a bit. Thank you. Barbara Knight Director of Registry Compliance bknight at Verisign.com m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01 AM To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet ? Apologies, Lars From: Lars Hoffmann Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" Subject: TDRP stats Dear all, In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month ? both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013. You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further. Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that: of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013 224 concerned .com (94.3%) 11 concerned .net (4.8%) 2 concerned .pro (0.9%) For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports With best wishes from rainy Brussels, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1593 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2186 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From krerdman at live.com Fri Apr 26 16:10:21 2013 From: krerdman at live.com (Kevin Erdman) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:10:21 -0400 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Lars, Given Barbara?s explanation that the resolution of each dispute always has a winner and loser, is it possible to get statistics on how many transfers were reversed after the TDRP versus how many transfers that were not reversed? ____________________________ Kevin R Erdman Reichel IP LLP 212 West 10th Street, Suite D-280 Indianapolis, IN 46202 voice 317.677.0689 fax 317.454.1349 skype kevimundo web www.reichelip.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Lars Hoffmann Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 10:56 AM To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats Dear Barbara, Thank you for the quick reply and useful information. This means then that the total number of cases was 152 in the period between October 2009 and March 2013. Breaking down as follows: .com = 142 (93.4%) .net = 8 (5.3%) .pro = 2 (1.3%) Best wishes, Lars From: , Barbara Knight Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 15:23 PM To: Lars Hoffmann , "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" Subject: RE: TDRP stats Lars, Thank you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the Transfers disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same because for each case, there is a ?winning? registrar and a ?losing registrar?. Likewise, the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases should actually be divided by 2 as these numbers also would have two registrars that were parties to the case and neither prevailed. Hope this helps to explain the numbers a bit. Thank you. Barbara Knight Director of Registry Compliance bknight at Verisign.com m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01 AM To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet ? Apologies, Lars From: Lars Hoffmann Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" Subject: TDRP stats Dear all, In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month ? both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013. You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further. Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that: of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013 224 concerned .com (94.3%) 11 concerned .net (4.8%) 2 concerned .pro (0.9%) For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports With best wishes from rainy Brussels, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1593 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2186 bytes Desc: not available URL: From BKnight at verisign.com Fri Apr 26 16:59:09 2013 From: BKnight at verisign.com (Knight, Barbara) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:59:09 +0000 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats In-Reply-To: References:

Message-ID: <7746E0B70F47DB448101E1DA28BCFF4135767870@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Kevin, That information is a bit more difficult to get to as a dispute may also be filed if the registrar of record denies a transfer request for a reason that is not listed in Section A(3) of the IRTP. I am checking to see if we have any reporting that would provide any insight into this. Barbara Knight Director of Registry Compliance bknight at Verisign.com m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com [Description: Verisign?] From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Erdman Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 12:10 PM To: Lars Hoffmann; gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats Dear Lars, Given Barbara?s explanation that the resolution of each dispute always has a winner and loser, is it possible to get statistics on how many transfers were reversed after the TDRP versus how many transfers that were not reversed? ____________________________ Kevin R Erdman Reichel IP LLP 212 West 10th Street, Suite D-280 Indianapolis, IN 46202 voice 317.677.0689 fax 317.454.1349 skype kevimundo web www.reichelip.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Lars Hoffmann Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 10:56 AM To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats Dear Barbara, Thank you for the quick reply and useful information. This means then that the total number of cases was 152 in the period between October 2009 and March 2013. Breaking down as follows: .com = 142 (93.4%) .net = 8 (5.3%) .pro = 2 (1.3%) Best wishes, Lars From: , Barbara Knight > Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 15:23 PM To: Lars Hoffmann >, "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" > Subject: RE: TDRP stats Lars, Thank you for sending along the spreadsheet. You are correct that the Transfers disputed won and the Transfers disputed lost numbers are the same because for each case, there is a ?winning? registrar and a ?losing registrar?. Likewise, the number of Transfers disputed nodecision cases should actually be divided by 2 as these numbers also would have two registrars that were parties to the case and neither prevailed. Hope this helps to explain the numbers a bit. Thank you. Barbara Knight Director of Registry Compliance bknight at Verisign.com m: 703-622-1071 t: 703-948-3343 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 VerisignInc.com [Description: Verisign?] From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:01 AM To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet ? Apologies, Lars From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" > Subject: TDRP stats Dear all, In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month ? both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013. You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further. Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that: of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013 224 concerned .com (94.3%) 11 concerned .net (4.8%) 2 concerned .pro (0.9%) For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports With best wishes from rainy Brussels, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1593 bytes Desc: image005.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image006.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2186 bytes Desc: image006.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1593 bytes Desc: image003.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.gif Type: image/gif Size: 3105 bytes Desc: image004.gif URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image008.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2186 bytes Desc: image008.jpg URL: From kdorrain at adrforum.com Mon Apr 29 14:24:39 2013 From: kdorrain at adrforum.com (Dorrain, Kristine) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:24:39 +0000 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] RE: TDRP stats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: To add some Provider data, the National Arbitration Forum has handled six TDRP cases. We were still keeping strictly paper files for all of these so the files are at Iron Mountain. The best I can do without requesting the boxes from storage is to extrapolate from notes made in our docketing system since TDRP decisions are not online. In five of the cases (for sure, possibly all six), the filing party prevailed. Three of the cases were definitely Appeals from a Registry decision. It's likely that five of them were, but I can't say with absolute certainty. The sixth decision may have been either a Request for Enforcement or an Appeal, I am not sure. We have had many questions and people trying to file TDRPs, but we have to tell them that only their Registrar can file. Talk to you all soon! Kristine Kristine Fordahl Dorrain Director of Internet and IP Services National Arbitration Forum (FORUM) Direct 952. 516. 6456 6465 Wayzata Blvd. Mobile 952. 836. 8613 Suite 470 Email kdorrain at adrforum.com Minneapolis, MN 55426 http://domains.adrforum.com This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and attachments. From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 3:01 AM To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet ... Apologies, Lars From: Lars Hoffmann > Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" > Subject: TDRP stats Dear all, In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month - both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013. You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further. Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that: of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013 224 concerned .com (94.3%) 11 concerned .net (4.8%) 2 concerned .pro (0.9%) For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports With best wishes from rainy Brussels, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lars.hoffmann at icann.org Mon Apr 29 14:45:31 2013 From: lars.hoffmann at icann.org (Lars Hoffmann) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:45:31 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear all, Following up on Kristine's message, this is the corresponding information that we received from the ADNDRC. https://www.adndrc.org/tdrp/tdrphk_decisions.html. As you can see on the site, in two of the total four cases the appeal was denied, once ADNDRC had no jurisdiction and in one case the the domain name was returned to the filing registrar. In light of Charter question d ( Whether requirements or best practices should be put into place for registrars to make information on transfer dispute resolution options available to registrants) I have asked ADNDRC whether they also received requests by registrants and will get back to you as soon as I have received a reply. Best wishes, Lars From: , Kristine Date: Monday, April 29, 2013 16:24 PM To: Lars Hoffmann , "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" Subject: RE: TDRP stats To add some Provider data, the National Arbitration Forum has handled six TDRP cases. We were still keeping strictly paper files for all of these so the files are at Iron Mountain. The best I can do without requesting the boxes from storage is to extrapolate from notes made in our docketing system since TDRP decisions are not online. In five of the cases (for sure, possibly all six), the filing party prevailed. Three of the cases were definitely Appeals from a Registry decision. It?s likely that five of them were, but I can?t say with absolute certainty. The sixth decision may have been either a Request for Enforcement or an Appeal, I am not sure. We have had many questions and people trying to file TDRPs, but we have to tell them that only their Registrar can file. Talk to you all soon! Kristine Kristine Fordahl Dorrain Director of Internet and IP Services National Arbitration Forum (FORUM)Direct 952. 516. 6456 6465 Wayzata Blvd.Mobile 952. 836. 8613 Suite 470Email kdorrain at adrforum.com Minneapolis, MN 55426http://domains.adrforum.com This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and attachments. From: owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 3:01 AM To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet ? Apologies, Lars From: Lars Hoffmann Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" Subject: TDRP stats Dear all, In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information. In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month ? both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013. You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) - but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further. Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that: of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013 224 concerned .com (94.3%) 11 concerned .net (4.8%) 2 concerned .pro (0.9%) For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports With best wishes from rainy Brussels, Lars -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5040 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mike at haven2.com Mon Apr 29 16:38:29 2013 From: mike at haven2.com (Mike O'Connor) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:38:29 -0500 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers and Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion Message-ID: <79070C58-55B7-4DE4-8690-42EE29FB21F0@haven2.com> hi all, i took an action to collect and organize our thoughts about a few useful questions to ask Barbara to go research. as i pulled the results from the chat i realized that we are actually asking questions of DR providers and Registrars as well. so here's a preliminary list. you have 4 hours to respond if you want your suggestions included in my next draft. sorry about the harsh timing, but i'm going to be off the net for a while after that and i want to get the final version out yet today. mikey Questions for Barbara (and any other Registry type people) to analyze What was the reason that the TDRP was requested? How many of the TDRP cases (first or second level) are due to an improper transfer and how many were because a transfer request was "nacked"? Are there other reasons why TDRPs are requested? If so, what are they? Is there a way to get a count of the number of TDRPs requested directly by Registrants (and presumably denied)? If the decision was in the win/loss column What's the proportion of wins vs losses? How many of these Registry decisions were eventually appealed to the 2nd level DRP? Is there any information as to the final disposition of these disputes -- eg UDRP, TDRP, court case? If the decision was "no decision" What is the breakdown of reasons why that conclusion was reached? How many of these Registry decisions were eventually appealed to the 2nd level DRP? Is there any information as to the final disposition of these disputes -- eg UDRP, TDRP, court case? Questions for 2nd-level DR providers Of those cases that they have received, have they received documentation from both parties to the dispute? How many requests come directly from registrants (and are presumably denied)? Questions for Registrars for the Registrar mediated xfrs (this would not be for Barbara!)...are they more likely to be an improper transfer or an improper denial of transfer? PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3630 bytes Desc: not available URL: From nathalie.peregrine at icann.org Mon Apr 29 17:16:15 2013 From: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org (Nathalie Peregrine) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:16:15 -0700 Subject: [gnso-irtpd] MP3 IRTP Part D Working Group - Monday 29 April 2013 at 15:00 UTC Message-ID: Dear All, The next Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D Working Group teleconference will be held on Monday 06th May 2013. Please find the MP3 recording for the IRTP Part D Working Group call held on Monday 29 April 2013 at 16:00 UTC at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-irtp-d-20130429-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#apr The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: James Bladel - RrSG Kristine Dorrain - NAF Kevin Erdman - IPC Barbara Knight - RySG Bob Mountain - RySG Mikey O'Connor - ISPCP Holly Raiche - ALAC Paul Diaz - RySG Jill Titzer - RrSG Graeme Bunton - RrSG Bartlett Morgan - NCUC Avri Doria - NCSG Chris Chaplow - CBUC Apologies: Simonetta Batteiger - RrSG ICANN staff: Marika Konings Berry Cobb Lars Hoffman Nathalie Peregrine ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-irtpd/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/B4JwAg Thank you. Kind regards, Nathalie Peregrine For GNSO Secretariat Adobe Chat Transcript for Monday 29 April 2013: Nathalie Peregrine:Welcome to the IRTP Part D Working Group meeting, Monday 29 April 2013 Mike O'Connor:i resent those references to open water Bladel:flood? Mike O'Connor:snow in the forecast tomorrow Bladel:ick. Bladel:Your snow becomes our flood a week later. Mike O'Connor:yep. our little gift to you Nathalie Peregrine:Avri Doria has joined the call Kristine Dorrain:Not every TDRP is because a domain name was transferred in error. You can also file them if you tried to transfer your domain name and it didn't happen. Mike O'Connor:very faint Mike O'Connor:not much Mike O'Connor:nothing... Bartlett Morgan 2:not hearing very well either Mike O'Connor:still faint Mike O'Connor:much Bartlett Morgan 2:yes Kristine Dorrain:from the TDRP: 3.3.4 If the data provided by neither Registrar appears to be conclusive, then the Registry shall issue a finding of "no decision." If the data provided to the Registry is complete and provides sufficient basis for a determination based on the Policy, the Registry may not issue a finding of "no decision." Either Registrar shall be able to appeal such issue to a Second-Level Dispute Resolution Provider in accordance with the provisions set forth below. Bladel:If we can put you on the spot like that. :) Mike O'Connor:is this Registry data, or DR provider data? Presuming Registry. right? Barbara Knight-RySG:Mikey, I believe that the data that is being shared is from the registry reporting Mike O'Connor:thanks Barbara Marika Konings:Yes, that is correct, what is on the screen is taken from the registry reports that are filed with ICANN (see https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports) Mike O'Connor:how hard would it be to go back and thumb through those 150 cases? could the WG help? Nathalie Peregrine:Chris Chaplow has joined the call Chris Chaplow:apologie for late join Barbara Knight-RySG:I need to step away for a moment. I will let you know when I am back. Mike O'Connor:Registrar-mediated xfer dispute Graeme Bunton:I'll see what I can get Barbara Knight-RySG:I am back Barbara Knight-RySG:Thanks Mikey. Bladel:Q: If the TDRP results in a "no-decision", must it go to 2nd level TDRP, or could it result in a UDRP? If so, is there any way to track that? Barbara Knight-RySG:Q of the Second Level TRDP providers - Of those cases that they have received, have they received documentation from both parties to the dispute? Kristine Dorrain:James, we have people try, the registrant has to establish TM rights to file a UDRP...this is something most registrants can't do... Mike O'Connor:Note James' good example of question-asking in chat Kristine Dorrain:Q: How many of the TDRP cases (first or second level) are due to an improper transfer and how many were because a transfer request was "nacked"? Barbara Knight-RySG:Q: How many of the disputes have been appealed to the second level providers. Kristine Dorrain:Q: for the Registrar mediated xfrs (this would not be for Barbara!)...are they more likely to be an improper transfer or an improper denial of transfer? Avri Doria:I also requested on NCSG and NCUC and not sure anyone's passions have been stirred yet. Mike O'Connor:i'll bet we've got the author of the BC response on this call. :-) Mike O'Connor:Lars could you give us control of scrolling? Mike O'Connor:thanks Lars Hoffmann:done - sorry about that. Avri Doria:i recomend you include the council liaison in the conversation. Avri Doria:who is the council laision? Lars Hoffmann:yes, it is volker Lars Hoffmann:mikey - i can sen you the chat. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mike at haven2.com Mon Apr 29 21:04:02 2013 From: mike at haven2.com (Mike O'Connor) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:04:02 -0500 Subject: Fwd: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers and Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion References: <79070C58-55B7-4DE4-8690-42EE29FB21F0@haven2.com> Message-ID: <790427DD-2B10-4A2A-9610-F8EE4C17C40A@haven2.com> looks like the 1st draft was "close enough." :-) here it is again. transmogrified into "final." mikey Begin forwarded message: > From: "Mike O'Connor" > Subject: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers and Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion > Date: April 29, 2013 11:38:29 AM CDT > To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org" > > > hi all, > > i took an action to collect and organize our thoughts about a few useful questions to ask Barbara to go research. as i pulled the results from the chat i realized that we are actually asking questions of DR providers and Registrars as well. so here's a preliminary list. you have 4 hours to respond if you want your suggestions included in my next draft. sorry about the harsh timing, but i'm going to be off the net for a while after that and i want to get the final version out yet today. > > mikey > > > Questions for Barbara (and any other Registry type people) to analyze > > What was the reason that the TDRP was requested? > > How many of the TDRP cases (first or second level) are due to an improper transfer and how many were because a transfer request was "nacked"? > Are there other reasons why TDRPs are requested? If so, what are they? > Is there a way to get a count of the number of TDRPs requested directly by Registrants (and presumably denied)? > > If the decision was in the win/loss column > > What's the proportion of wins vs losses? > How many of these Registry decisions were eventually appealed to the 2nd level DRP? > Is there any information as to the final disposition of these disputes -- eg UDRP, TDRP, court case? > > If the decision was "no decision" > > What is the breakdown of reasons why that conclusion was reached? > How many of these Registry decisions were eventually appealed to the 2nd level DRP? > Is there any information as to the final disposition of these disputes -- eg UDRP, TDRP, court case? > > Questions for 2nd-level DR providers > > Of those cases that they have received, have they received documentation from both parties to the dispute? > > How many requests come directly from registrants (and are presumably denied)? > > Questions for Registrars > > for the Registrar mediated xfrs (this would not be for Barbara!)...are they more likely to be an improper transfer or an improper denial of transfer? > > > > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3630 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mike at haven2.com Tue Apr 30 01:46:50 2013 From: mike at haven2.com (Mike O'Connor) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:46:50 -0500 Subject: Fwd: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers and Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion References: Message-ID: hi all, that's what happens when you try to do working-group work while running a tractor. i missed Kevin's note. so you "question answering type people" please add Kevin's questions to your list. thanks, mikey Begin forwarded message: > From: "Kevin Erdman" > Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers and Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion > Date: April 29, 2013 1:54:22 PM CDT > To: "Mike O'Connor" > > Mikey, thanks for organizing these questions, good first cut, a couple of thoughts on expansion in your text below... > ____________________________ > Kevin R Erdman > Reichel IP LLP > 212 West 10th Street, Suite D-280 > Indianapolis, IN 46202 > voice 317.677.0689 > fax 317.454.1349 > skype kevimundo > web www.reichelip.com > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > From: Mike O'Connor > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 12:38 PM > To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org > Subject: [gnso-irtpd] A series of questions (for Registries, DR providers and Registrars) arising from todays TDRP discussion > > > hi all, > > i took an action to collect and organize our thoughts about a few useful questions to ask Barbara to go research. as i pulled the results from the chat i realized that we are actually asking questions of DR providers and Registrars as well. so here's a preliminary list. you have 4 hours to respond if you want your suggestions included in my next draft. sorry about the harsh timing, but i'm going to be off the net for a while after that and i want to get the final version out yet today. > > mikey > > > Questions for Barbara (and any other Registry type people) to analyze > > What was the reason that the TDRP was requested? > > How many of the TDRP cases (first or second level) are due to an improper transfer and how many were because a transfer request was "nacked"? > Are there other reasons why TDRPs are requested? If so, what are they? > Is there a way to get a count of the number of TDRPs requested directly by Registrants (and presumably denied)? > Is it possible to breakdown the statistics by which individual Registrars filed and defended TDRPs? > > If the decision was in the win/loss column > > What's the proportion of wins vs losses? > How many of these Registry decisions were eventually appealed to the 2nd level DRP? > Is there any information as to the final disposition of these disputes -- eg UDRP, TDRP, arbitration, court case? > > If the decision was "no decision" > > What is the breakdown of reasons why that conclusion was reached? > How many of the TDRP?s filed were resolved by informal processes requiring no decision? Were any such resolutions guided by Registry? > How many of these Registry decisions were eventually appealed to the 2nd level DRP? > Is there any information as to the final disposition of these disputes -- eg UDRP, TDRP, court case? > > Questions for 2nd-level DR providers > > Of those cases that they have received, have they received documentation from both parties to the dispute? > > How many requests come directly from registrants (and are presumably denied)? > > Questions for Registrars > > for the Registrar mediated xfrs (this would not be for Barbara!)...are they more likely to be an improper transfer or an improper denial of transfer? > > > > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3630 bytes Desc: not available URL: