[gnso-irtpd] Here's the summary of the framing questions we developed on the call today

[Angie Graves]

Thanks for this, Mike!

Angie


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Mike O'Connor <mike at haven2.com> wrote:

> hi all,
>
> thanks for saving me all that drafting time.  here's a copy of what we
> came up with today
>
>
> Dispute resolution mechanisms
>
>
>     Document informal AND formal mechanisms
>         Informal mechanisms
>             more attractive
>             faster/easier
>         Formal mechanisms
>             used as last resort
>             data suggests that they're rarely used
>             reasons for low use
>                 not effective?
>                 unknown
>             Describe 1st and 2nd level providers
>                 Registries
>                 ICANN approved 2nd level providers
>         Helpful approach -- use cases
>
>
>     Changes since we were chartered
>         TEAC
>         Vast increase in registry operators
>         "Change of registrant" and associated policy/process changes
>
>
>     Questions to ask
>         Are they sufficient?
>         Are they appropriate?
>         Are they to be preferred?
>         Are they even needed?
>         Who provides them?
>             Layers in the formal process
>                 Registries and ICANN-approved 2nd level providers
>                 Should this be retained or should Registries be dropped
> out?
>         Who is using them?
>         Who is aware of them?  Are the right people aware of them?
>             How did they become aware?
>             Are they/should they be informed by their Registrar
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130624/af7e48ac/attachment.html>