FW: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats

Mon May 20 16:06:38 UTC 2013

Hi folks:

See below for our contribution to the data set.  It was actually sent by Jill earlier this month:

J.

From: Jill Titzer <jtitzer at godaddy.com<mailto:jtitzer at godaddy.com>>
Date: Thursday, May 2, 2013 19:33
To: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org>>, "gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>" <gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>>
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats

Hi everyone,

Here is the request for registrar stats for our IRTP-D WG:

  *   A typical month would be 30-50 transfer disputes
  *   We resolve a quarter of them by working with other registrars
  *   The remaining domain names that were not successly returned were due to the following reasons:
     *   Losing registrar stopped pursuing the dispute
     *   The customers resolved the issues themselves
     *   Investigation determined one party of the dispute filed a false dispute

Thanks.  Talk with everyone next week.
_______________________
Jill Titzer
ICANN Policy
GoDaddy
jtitzer at godaddy.com<mailto:jtitzer at godaddy.com>

Work+1 480 505 8800 extension 4464
Mobile +1 602 561 9707
Fax +1 480 393 4275
[cid:icon_sm_twitter.gif at 18c06316166f17b2c6fe7bf3b7b94967]Jill_Tz<http://twitter.com/Jill_Tz>
Skype: JATitzer1

Typical Time Zone = UTC -7 (US Mountain)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] Re: TDRP stats
From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org>>
Date: Mon, April 29, 2013 7:45 am
To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>" <gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>>

Dear all,

Following up on Kristine's message, this is the corresponding information that we received from the ADNDRC. https://www.adndrc.org/tdrp/tdrphk_decisions.html. As you can see on the site, in two of the total four cases the appeal was denied, once ADNDRC had no jurisdiction and in one case the the domain name was returned to the filing registrar.

In light of Charter question d ( Whether requirements or best practices should be put into place for registrars to make information on transfer dispute resolution options available to registrants) I have asked ADNDRC whether they also received requests by registrants and will get back to you as soon as I have received a reply.

Best wishes,
Lars

From: <Dorrain>, Kristine <kdorrain at adrforum.com<mailto:kdorrain at adrforum.com>>
Date: Monday, April 29, 2013 16:24 PM
To: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org>>, "gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>" <gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>>
Subject: RE: TDRP stats

To add some Provider data, the National Arbitration Forum has handled six TDRP cases.  We were still keeping strictly paper files for all of these so the files are at Iron Mountain.  The best I can do without requesting the boxes from storage is to extrapolate from notes made in our docketing system since TDRP decisions are not online.

In five of the cases (for sure, possibly all six), the filing party prevailed.
Three of the cases were definitely Appeals from a Registry decision.  It’s likely that five of them were, but I can’t say with absolute certainty.  The sixth decision may have been either a Request for Enforcement or an Appeal, I am not sure.

We have had many questions and people trying to file TDRPs, but we have to tell them that only their Registrar can file.

Talk to you all soon!

Kristine

Kristine Fordahl Dorrain

Director of Internet and IP Services

National Arbitration Forum (FORUM)

Direct  952. 516. 6456

6465 Wayzata Blvd.

Mobile  952. 836. 8613

Suite 470

Email  kdorrain at adrforum.com<mailto:kdorrain at adrforum.com>

Minneapolis, MN  55426

http://domains.adrforum.com

This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and attachments.

From:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org> [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpd at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lars Hoffmann
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 3:01 AM
To: gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-irtpd] FW: TDRP stats

And just in case, you actually would like to see the promised spreadsheet …
Apologies,
Lars

From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann at icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann at icann.org>>
Date: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:59 AM
To: "gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>" <gnso-irtpd at icann.org<mailto:gnso-irtpd at icann.org>>
Subject: TDRP stats

Dear all,

In light of the Group's discussion on TDRP we have  been in touch with transfer dispute providers to provide us with data from the cases they receive. We will share this with the group as soon as we have received and collated the relevant information.

In addition, we gathered some Registry-related TDRP data that might be useful to the discussion, too. I have attached a spreadsheet containing one sheet on the TDRP per TLD and a second sheet with an overview of the total number of TDRPs per month – both data sets are for the period of October 2009 to March 2013.

You might notice that the numbers for 'lost' and 'won' TDRP are exactly the same each month. As this is too much of a coincidence, we assume that these represent the same case (as one party lost it and another won it) -  but maybe a working group member of the RySG might be able to clarify further.  Assuming that our assumption is correct the breakdown per TLD shows that:

of 227 total cases between October 2009 and March 2013

224 concerned .com (94.3%)
11 concerned .net (4.8%)
2 concerned .pro (0.9%)

For those of you interested, the data for these tables were sourced from the monthly Registry Reports filed with ICANN, see http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/reports

With best wishes from rainy Brussels,
Lars

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130520/bd09299b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: icon_sm_twitter.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1016 bytes
Desc: icon_sm_twitter.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-irtpd/attachments/20130520/bd09299b/icon_sm_twitter.gif>