[gnso-irtpd] IRTP Part D Final Report 2nd Draft

[Holly Raiche]

Hi Lars (and everyone)

Sorry I”ll be an apology for the next meeting.  The point I was making at the last meeting was with the first sentence.  We have considered allowing registrants into the dispute process as provided for in IRTP-C - and then rejected it.  What was decided instead what that, with a far clearer explanation of processes on the ICANN website, registrants should be able to better understand the process, including what the rules provide.  And when their registrar should take action (under the RAA) but doesn’t, the registrant can to to ICANN compliance and ask that the registrar be required to take action.  The first sentence in the report seems to imply more.

Thanks

Holly

On 14 Aug 2014, at 4:57 pm, Lars Hoffmann <Lars.hoffmann at icann.org> wrote:

> <IRTP-DFinalReport_V2.doc>