[gnso-irtpd] Transfer stats as discussed on the call

[Volker Greimann]

Hi Rob,

actually, there is no need for any action with regard to the FoA from 
the losing registrar. The only FOA requiring registrant action is the 
FOA sent by the gaining registrar.

Volker


Am 12.05.2014 17:56, schrieb Rob Golding:
> Whilst we only have a small number of domains dealt with und3er our
> accreditations, I have no doubt that the issue would 'scale' with bugger
> numbers ...
>
> Figures for inbound transfers:
>
> 3897 transfers requested by registrants
> 2737 transfers completed
> 29 transfers actively cancelled
>
> 1131 transfers failed at least once due to FOA issues
> 986 either didnt get, didnt understand or didnt realise they needed to
> follow the FOA from the losing registrar
>
>  From our ticket history (so actual number may be more if they didn't contact
> is about it ) but at least 108 transfer needed the FOA sent at least *5
> times* to get past spam filters, whitelists etc
>
> Every one of these transfer requests had ordered, paid (where necessary),
> accepted the terms and supplied the EPP code - I.e. all the things on the
> inbound FOA anyway - As you cannot start a transfer without the EPP code
> (and the FOA predates them by about 10 years) IMHO it's become the defaco
> replacement of the 'standardised email' for the *gaining* registrar.
>
> Regards,
> Rob
> --
> rob.golding at astutium.com    www.astutium.com    020 3475 2555
> Astutium Ltd, 1st Floor, Number One Poultry, London, EC2R 8JR
> Registered in England (UK) / Company #8183381 / VAT #145054825
>
> Get your new website online today at https://www.astutium.com
> domains email hosting vps cloud colo dedicated servers iptransit
>
>