[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 22 August 2018 at 20.00 UTC

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All, May someone send me the adobe
Tks
KAVOUSS

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 3:16 PM Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange at norid.no>
wrote:

> Thank you, Jorge.
>
>
>
> It would be useful if members did as you, used the list below and tried to
> answer them from their standing point.
>
> Olga will lead the non-AGB discussion tomorrow and the better prepared we
> all are, the better.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Annebeth
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *"Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch" <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 14:47
> *To: *"Annebeth B. Lange" <annebeth.lange at norid.no>, "
> gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
> *Cc: *"gnso-secs at icann.org" <gnso-secs at icann.org>
> *Subject: *AW: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 22
> August 2018 at 20.00 UTC
>
>
>
> Dear Annebeth and all
>
>
>
> I wonder how the co-leads intend to structure the discussion around
> “non-AGB terms”.
>
>
>
> If I may, I would suggest that we approach the issue step-by-step:
>
>
>
>    1. Consider if data from the 2012 AGB round indicates whether there
>    were issues with strings with geographic significance
>    2. Consider what kind of issues were identified, eg lack of awareness,
>    lack of communication, lack of understanding, competing interests…
>    3. Consider whether those issues merit being addressed
>    4. consider what means are at our disposal in the policy tool-box to
>    address such issues
>    5. discuss on which policy tools may have enough traction
>
>
>
>
>
> I feel that I have already made my substantial points clear, but here they
> go again in a summarized fashion (following the sequence summarized above):
>
>
>
>    1. Yes, I feel there were important issues with non-AGB terms, which
>    have resulted in conflicts between applicants and authorities;
>    2. Probably there was a bit of all kind of issues in differing degrees
>    in the various cases we have heard of;
>    3. Yes, as the process and also the legitimacy of the TLD expansion
>    would benefit from an agreed approach that takes all legitimate interests
>    on board;
>    4. I have mentioned a few, but here they go again:
>
> -             We need a framework governing terms not fitting in any new
> specific category but still having such a “geographic significance”.
>
> -              Both applicants and interested parties with claims to such
> geographic significance terms would benefit from a more predictable
> framework of rules, and, therefore, the need for last-minute interventions
> would be minimized.
>
> -              Elements of such a framework could be:
>
>    - a diligent search requirement for applicants – which could be linked
>    to a “Geonames Advisory Panel” and/or internationally available lists of
>    geographic terms and/or a voluntary repository/database of such terms;
>    - a contact obligation for applicants;
>    - incentives to reach an amicable solution, such as a prima facie
>    non-objection requirement. The non-objection letter could be subject to
>    deadlines, and to an implied non-objection if the corresponding authority
>    does not respond within the deadline;
>    - a fair, quick, cheap and independent mediation and/or dispute
>    resolution mechanism in case there are disagreements between applicant and
>    relevant authority.
>
>
>
> I hope this may be helpful…
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *Von:* Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org> *Im
> Auftrag von *Annebeth Lange
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 21. August 2018 08:40
> *An:* gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> *Cc:* gnso-secs at icann.org
> *Betreff:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 22
> August 2018 at 20.00 UTC
>
>
>
> Dear Work Track 5 members,
>
>
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the upcoming Work Track 5 call
> on Wednesday 22nd August 2018 at 20.00 UTC:
>
>
>
> 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
>
> 2. Status of Draft Recommendations on 2-Letter ASCII Strings and Country
> and Territory Names
>
> 3. Non-AGB Terms
>
> 4. AOB
>
>
>
> We refer to the email sent out by Emily yesterday, Monday 20th August,
> with Draft Recommendations.
>
>
>
> If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology for this call,
> please email gnso-secs at icann.org as far in advance as possible.
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> WT5 Co-leads
>
> Javier Rua
>
> Olga Cavalli
>
> Martin Sutton
>
> Annebeth Lange
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20180822/18e826d8/attachment-0001.html>