[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
lists@christopherwilkinson.eu Wilkinson
lists at christopherwilkinson.eu
Sat Dec 1 08:08:08 UTC 2018
Well, as far as I know, we are still waiting for a full, official, report on the activities of the GNP at the time. Application by application.
CW
> El 30 de noviembre de 2018 a las 17:02 "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at winston.com> escribió:
>
>
> Thanks Annebeth.
>
>
>
> The answer to your question is in the immediately following sentences:
>
>
>
> “Some of these TLDs were permitted to move forward, some were only permitted where an arrangement could be reached with the geographic territory in question, and others were either not allowed to proceed or are still the subject of dispute.”
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange at norid.no>
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 9:58 AM
> To: McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady at winston.com>; Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> It could have been good to know “inconsistent” with what? In my mind, that word is used that way. If the “some” that suggested it could clarify that, perhaps it would be clearer`
>
>
>
> Have a wonderful weekend all,
>
>
>
> Annebeth
>
>
>
> From: "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at winston.com mailto:PMcGrady at winston.com >
> Date: Friday, 30 November 2018 at 15:50
> To: "Annebeth B. Lange" <annebeth.lange at norid.no mailto:annebeth.lange at norid.no >, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org >
> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org " <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org >
> Subject: RE: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I didn’t think we were going to just remove “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.”, which some thought was a value judgment, but rather modify it to something like “Some believe that treatment of these strings was inconsistent.” I think this is consistent with the “Some” approach that is throughout the document.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org > On Behalf Of Annebeth Lange
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 1:52 AM
> To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org >
> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> I have no strong objections to this. Actually, it is important to highlight it when it is only «some», so it does not seem like it is a view the whole group shares.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Annebeth
>
>
>
>
>
> Annebeth B Lange
>
> Special Adviser International Policy
>
> UNINETT Norid AS
>
> Phone: +47 959 11 559
>
> Mail: annebeth.lange at norid.no mailto:annebeth.lange at norid.no
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 29. nov. 2018 kl. 22:00 skrev Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org >:
>
> > >
> > Dear all,
> >
> >
> >
> > It appears that we neglected to walk through these new comments from Jorge on the call yesterday. If there are any strong objections to the following, please respond on list by 21:00 UTC tomorrow, 30 November:
> >
> >
> >
> > * On page 12, remove sentence “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.”
> > * On page 42, add the word “some” to the sentence referenced below.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Emily
> >
> >
> >
> > From: "Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch " <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch >
> > Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 11:42
> > To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org >, "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org " <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org >
> > Subject: [Ext] AW: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Emily
> >
> >
> >
> > Please include the following comments in the consideration:
> >
> >
> >
> > - Page 12: “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.” à this is just the opinion expressed (as far as I know) by one member. “inconsistent” is a value call. We could say that there were different treatments – whether that differentiation was inconsistent or not has not been agreed.
> >
> >
> >
> > - Page 42: the following heading/intro seems to reflect an agreed view, when it is only the view of “some”, hence it should read “Some of the issues problems and negative experiences that some Work Track members identified from the 2012 round include the following.”
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> >
> >
> > Jorge
> >
> >
> >
> > Von: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org > Im Auftrag von Emily Barabas
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2018 20:52
> > An: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> > Betreff: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> >
> >
> > Please find below the proposed agenda for the Work Track 5 call taking place tomorrow 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC for 90 mins.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
> > 2. Initial Report – Outstanding Items
> > 3. AOB
> >
> > - Additional information request – Geographic Names Panel
> >
> >
> >
> > Please find attached the latest version of the draft Initial Report. This version incorporates new feedback received in the last week. New comments are highlighted in either blue or yellow. For those highlighted in blue, the resolution was relatively straightforward and staff has proposed edits. Comments in yellow require additional input and will be discussed on the call tomorrow.
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Emily
> >
> >
> >
> > Emily Barabas | Policy Manager
> >
> > ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
> >
> > Email: emily.barabas at icann.org mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> > Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fgnso-newgtld-wg-wt5&data=02%7C01%7CPMcGrady%40winston.com%7Ce3f3f3d5f56f45701cfa08d656dc99ac%7C12a8aae45e2f4ad8adab9375a84aa3e5%7C0%7C0%7C636791902827175475&sdata=eLWH6YaJOVS%2Fa6Gt9ypdJSAD5lw%2B%2B4qEJ5uprjanoAY%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20181201/19b19943/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
mailing list