[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC

[Emily Barabas]

Dear Kavouss,

The sentence currently reads: “Some of the problems and negative experiences that some Work Track members identified from the 2012 round include the following. Some believe that. . .”

Is this phrasing more clear: “Some Work Track members identified problems and negative experiences from the 2012 round. Some believe that. . .”?

Note that there is also a sub-section in the text that describes positive experiences.

Kind regards,
Emily


From: Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
Date: Friday, 30 November 2018 at 12:45
To: Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange at norid.no>
Cc: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC

Dear All
I agree with the first ( para. 12) but I have difficulty with paragraph 42not due to the addition on some proposed by Jorge but on the very awkward structure of the sentence
It needs to be redrafted including suggestion made by Jorge
In fact U gave difficulties to grasp “ negative experience”as experience usually is not associated with adjective such as positive or negative due to the fact that the use of such adjective is purely subjective .
Regards
Kavouss

Sent from my iPhone

On 30 Nov 2018, at 08:52, Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange at norid.no<mailto:annebeth.lange at norid.no>> wrote:
Hi all

I have no strong objections to this. Actually, it is important to highlight it when it is only «some», so it does not seem like it is a view the whole group shares.

Best regards,
Annebeth


Annebeth B Lange
Special Adviser International Policy
UNINETT Norid AS
Phone: +47 959 11 559
Mail: annebeth.lange at norid.no<mailto:annebeth.lange at norid.no>



29. nov. 2018 kl. 22:00 skrev Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>:
Dear all,

It appears that we neglected to walk through these new comments from Jorge on the call yesterday. If there are any strong objections to the following, please respond on list by 21:00 UTC tomorrow, 30 November:


  *   On page 12, remove sentence “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.”
  *   On page 42, add the word “some” to the sentence referenced below.

Kind regards,
Emily

From: "Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>" <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>>
Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 11:42
To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>, "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>>
Subject: [Ext] AW: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC

Dear Emily

Please include the following comments in the consideration:


  *   Page 12: “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.” --> this is just the opinion expressed (as far as I know) by one member. “inconsistent” is a value call. We could say that there were different treatments – whether that differentiation was inconsistent or not has not been agreed.



  *   Page 42: the following heading/intro seems to reflect an agreed view, when it is only the view of “some”, hence it should read “Some of the issues problems and negative experiences that some Work Track members identified from the 2012 round include the following.”

Best regards

Jorge

Von: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org>> Im Auftrag von Emily Barabas
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2018 20:52
An: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
Betreff: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC

Dear all,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the Work Track 5 call taking place tomorrow 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC for 90 mins.


  1.  Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
  2.  Initial Report – Outstanding Items
  3.  AOB

  *   Additional information request – Geographic Names Panel

Please find attached the latest version of the draft Initial Report. This version incorporates new feedback received in the last week. New comments are highlighted in either blue or yellow. For those highlighted in blue, the resolution was relatively straightforward and staff has proposed edits. Comments in yellow require additional input and will be discussed on the call tomorrow.

Kind regards,
Emily

Emily Barabas | Policy Manager
ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20181130/7af778f2/attachment-0001.html>