[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC

Fri Nov 30 18:42:01 UTC 2018

I think Paul’s suggestion makes sense.

Greg

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:02 AM Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
wrote:

> Do others have feedback about Paul’s suggestion?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
>
>
> *From: *Annebeth Lange <annebeth.lange at norid.no>
> *Date: *Friday, 30 November 2018 at 16:58
> *To: *"McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at winston.com>, Emily Barabas <
> emily.barabas at icann.org>
> *Cc: *"gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work
> Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> It could have been good to know “inconsistent” with what? In my mind, that
> word is used that way. If the “some” that suggested it could clarify that,
> perhaps it would be clearer`
>
>
>
> Have a wonderful weekend all,
>
>
>
> Annebeth
>
>
>
> *From: *"McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at winston.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 30 November 2018 at 15:50
> *To: *"Annebeth B. Lange" <annebeth.lange at norid.no>, Emily Barabas <
> emily.barabas at icann.org>
> *Cc: *"gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
> *Subject: *RE: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work
> Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I didn’t think we were going to just remove “Treatment of these strings
> was inconsistent.”, which some thought was a value judgment, but rather
> modify it to something like “Some believe that treatment of these strings
> was inconsistent.”  I think this is consistent with the “Some” approach
> that is throughout the document.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org> *On
> Behalf Of *Annebeth Lange
> *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2018 1:52 AM
> *To:* Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
> *Cc:* gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work
> Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> I have no strong objections to this. Actually, it is important to
> highlight it when it is only «some», so it does not seem like it is a view
> the whole group shares.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Annebeth
>
>
>
>
>
> Annebeth B Lange
>
> Special Adviser International Policy
>
> UNINETT Norid AS
>
> Phone: +47 959 11 559
>
> Mail: annebeth.lange at norid.no
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 29. nov. 2018 kl. 22:00 skrev Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> It appears that we neglected to walk through these new comments from Jorge
> on the call yesterday. If there are any strong objections to the following,
> please respond on list by 21:00 UTC tomorrow, 30 November:
>
>
>
>    - On page 12, remove sentence “Treatment of these strings was
>    inconsistent.”
>    - On page 42, add the word “some” to the sentence referenced below.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
>
>
> *From: *"Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch" <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 11:42
> *To: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>, "
> gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] AW: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5
> - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Dear Emily
>
>
>
> Please include the following comments in the consideration:
>
>
>
>    - Page 12: “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.” à this is
>    just the opinion expressed (as far as I know) by one member. “inconsistent”
>    is a value call. We could say that there were different treatments –
>    whether that differentiation was inconsistent or not has not been agreed.
>
>
>
>    - Page 42: the following heading/intro seems to reflect an agreed
>    view, when it is only the view of “some”, hence it should read “Some of the
>    issues problems and negative experiences that some Work Track members
>    identified from the 2012 round include the following.”
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *Von:* Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces at icann.org> *Im
> Auftrag von *Emily Barabas
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 27. November 2018 20:52
> *An:* gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> *Betreff:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28
> November 2018 at 20:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the Work Track 5 call taking
> place tomorrow 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC for 90 mins.
>
>
>
>    1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
>    2. Initial Report – Outstanding Items
>    3. AOB
>
>
>    - Additional information request – Geographic Names Panel
>
>
>
> Please find attached the latest version of the draft Initial Report. This
> version incorporates new feedback received in the last week. New comments
> are highlighted in either blue or yellow. For those highlighted in blue,
> the resolution was relatively straightforward and staff has proposed edits.
> Comments in yellow require additional input and will be discussed on the
> call tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
>
>
> *Emily Barabas *| Policy Manager
>
> *ICANN* | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>
> Email: emily.barabas at icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
> [na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fmm.icann.org-252Fmailman-252Flistinfo-252Fgnso-2Dnewgtld-2Dwg-2Dwt5-26data-3D02-257C01-257Cpmcgrady-2540winston.com-257C9a0b0941010447779bd808d65698d655-257C12a8aae45e2f4ad8adab9375a84aa3e5-257C0-257C0-257C636791611774897429-26sdata-3DAZFpAuOXDENS2FgAUME7dCvG3UQMqUuruEobILIr4-252Fw-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=RGj9Fti0xUMfMHMzsuQXegRc09_h5lA7xTdJoWxOV3o&s=-CDIdvXS8S4d5aqMrrDp0cUgyo_PfD_VESnn6FpKtVo&e=>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this
> message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it.
> Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable
> privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of
> the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be
> used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties
> under applicable tax laws and regulations.
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20181130/4e10fb72/attachment-0001.html>