[Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Notes and Action Items - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Work Track 5 - 10 April 2019

Wed Apr 10 06:23:39 UTC 2019

Dear Work Track 5 members,

Please see below the action items and notes from the Work Track 5 meeting today, 10 April 2019 at 05:00 UTC.  These high-level notes are designed to help WT5 members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute for the recording, transcript, or the chat, which will be posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-04-10+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP+Work+Track+5.

Kind regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

Notes and Action Items:

1. Updates to Statements of Interest: No updates provided.

2. Continue Review of Public Comments: Questions for Community Input – start at line 90

Question e5:
Line 90, NCSG, Concerns Divergence
Line 91, RDS-HN (Honduras), Agreement (though unclear what their preference in basis is)
Line 92, GAC [comment]
Line 93, Tom Dale (individual), [Comment - questions posed to the WG]

Question e6:
Line 95, APTLD, [comment] -- All languages
Line 96, dotBERLIN GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg Top-Level-Domain GmbH, geoTLD.group, [comment], All languages
Line 97, RDS-HN (Honduras), Agreement, All languages
Line 98, Dotzon GmbH, [comment], All languages
Line 99, ALAC, [comment], All languages
Line 100, Government of Spain, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, SWITCH, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs, German GAC, oriGIn, European Broadcasting Union, government of France, association of European regions for origin products (AREPO), Republic of Peru, Concerns, All languages, Otherwise -- Official, relevant national, regional and community languages
Line 101, Uninett Norid AS, Concerns (unaware of evidence of issues), -- All languages, Otherwise -- UN and official languages
Line 102, ccNSO, Concerns (unaware of evidence of issues), - All languages, Otherwise -- Official languages
Line 103, CENTR AFNIC, Concerns (unaware of evidence of issues), -- All languages, Otherwise, UN and official languages
Line 104 Portuguese Government, Concerns, -- All languages, Otherwise -- Official, relevant national, regional and community languages
Line 105,  RySG, Concerns, - Some support for all languages -- Some support for just official languages -- Some support for UN and official languages
Line 106, Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia, Fundación Incluirme, [comment],  Official, relevant national, regional and community languages
Line 107, Business Constituency, Official language and commonly used languages
Line 108, United States, [comment], UN and official languages
Line 109, Brand Registry Group, Concerns, Official Language
Line 110, RrSG, [comment], Official Languages
Line 111, Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), concerns, Official Languages
Line 112, nternational Trademark Association (INTA), [comment], Official Languages
Line 113, Group of Registries:, Uniregistry, Minds + Machines Group , Top  Level  Design
Amazon Registry Services , Employ Media LLC, Concerns, Official Languages
Line 114, NCSG, Concerns, -- No translations (or reservations of geo names period)

Question e7:
Line 116, Brand Registry Group, Agreement, WT5 should develop policy to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
Line 117, Business Constituency, Agreement, WT5 should develop policy to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
Line 118, ALAC, Agreement, New Idea, WT5 should develop policy to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
Line 119, United States, Agreement, WT5 should develop policy to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
Line 120, NCSG, Agreement, WT5 should develop policy to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes (i.e., to allow existing policy to remain)
Line 121, Group of Registries: Uniregistry, Minds + Machines Group, Top  Level  Design , Amazon Registry Services , Employ Media LLC, [comment, WT5 should develop policy to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes (can be inferred)
Line 122, RySG, [Does not directly respond], WT5 should develop policy to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes (can be inferred) -- Done in coordination with the GAC
Line 123, RDS-HN (Honduras), Agreement (although response does not seem directly related?)
Line 124, ccNSO,Divergence (set up separate process), WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
-- Separate process afterwards
Line 125, dotBERLIN GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg Top-Level-Domain GmbH, geoTLD.group, Divergence, WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes -- Separate process afterwards
Line 126, CENTR AFNIC, Divergence, WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes -- Separate process afterwards
LIne 127, Uninett Norid AS, Divergence, WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes -- Separate process afterwards
Line 128, Dotzon GmbH, Divergence, -- WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes -- Separate process afterwards
Line 129, Portuguese Government, [comment], WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
Line 130, Government of Spain, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, SWITCH, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs, German GAC, oriGIn, European Broadcasting Union, government of France, association of European regions for origin products (AREPO), Republic of Peru, Divergence (Support for most of the existing 2012 rules. Therefore, opposition to this question), WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
From the chat:
Justine Chew: Line 130: I wonder if the summary should be "--WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes (though they believe that use of 3-letter codes should be akin to ccTLDs" or something along these lines?
Line 131, Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) Divergence, WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
Line 132, Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia, Fundación Incluirme, Divergence, WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes
LIne 133, Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), Divergence, -- WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes (though they do not support restrictions on the use 3-letter codes as gTLDs)
From the chat:
Susan Payne: wrong characterisation for IPC in the summary column.  does not say the ISO3166-1 codes should not be delegated, it says they should not be allocated to specific parties
Line 134, International Trademark Association (INTA), Divergence, -- WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes (though they do not support restrictions on the use 3-letter codes as gTLDs)
From the chat:
Susan Payne: wrong characterisation for IPC in the summary column.  does not say the ISO3166-1 codes should not be delegated, it says they should not be allocated to specific parties
Susan Payne: ditto for inta
Line 135, GAC, [comment]
From the chat:
Dev Anand Teelucksingh: Shouldn't the field E135 (for the GAC) have the text "-- WT5 should not make recommendations to delegate 3-letter ISO-3166-1 codes" ?
Line 136, Georgia, Concerns (about who should use) [Does not address the procedural question]

Question e8:
Line 138, otBERLIN GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg Top-Level-Domain GmbH, geoTLD.group, [comment], All Languages
From the chat:
Katrin Ohlmer | .berlin .hamburg: I think the comment by .berlin, .hamburg, geoTLD.group and Dotzon shoul be categorized as "Agreement" - like the comment by Honduras
Line 139, RDS-HN (Honduras), Agreement, All Languages
From the chat:
Susan Payne: don’t see how Honduras can be Agreement since this is a series of options
Justine Chew: @Susan, the same could be said for other questions to which RDS-HN was interpreted as "having agreed".
Justine Chew: @Susan, unless the approach is to apply their "support" to the main statement and disregarding the actual question and options. Sigh.
Steve Chan: It's really just the Honduras comments - because they specifically say Support.
Steve Chan: We can remove the green if it makes you all more comfortable.
Line 140 Dotzon GmbH, [comment], All Languages
Line 141, ALAC, [comment[, All Languages
Line 142, Government of Spain, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, SWITCH, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs, German GAC, oriGIn, European Broadcasting Union, government of France, association of European regions for origin products (AREPO), Republic of Peru, Concerns, -- All languages, Otherwise -- Official, relevant national, regional and community languages
Line 143, Portuguese Government, [comment], -- All languages, Otherwise -- Official, relevant national, regional and community languages
Line 144, Business Constituency, Official and commonly used languages
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5/attachments/20190410/4cac8b4c/attachment-0001.html>