[Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Proposed Agenda for 4 April 2016

Mon Apr 4 10:59:08 UTC 2016

Dear All,

Will be a little late for this evening meeting but should be in by 6.45

Regards

R

On Mon, 4 Apr 2016 at 06:18 Kavouss Arasteh via Gnso-newgtld-wg <
gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear Jeff
> Dear Steve,
> Thanks for the helpful tracks
> Reagrds
> Kavouss
>
> 2016-04-04 0:52 GMT+02:00 Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>:
>
>> Dear Kavouss,
>>
>> To add to what Jeff mentioned, here is a bit of additional detail/context
>> that you will hopefully find useful.
>>
>> The subjects that are contained in the Charter (
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-charter-21jan16-en.pdf)
>> and the Final Issue Report (
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/new-gtlds/subsequent-procedures-final-issue-04dec15-en.pdf),
>> stem from the work of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Discussion Group (
>> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/inactive/2015/non-pdp-new-gtld)
>> that preceded this PDP, which reflected upon the experiences from the 2012
>> round of the New gTLD Program to identify subjects for future possible
>> policy development. The Final Issue Report seeks to provide additional
>> detail and analysis around these subjects, which could be considered the
>> "difficulties, shorthcoming, deficiencies and problems encountered” from
>> the community’s perspective. Jeff already provided the link to the ICANN
>> staff developed New gTLD Program Reviews, which I think directly answers
>> your question.
>>
>> In regards to contacting the GAC, outreach to the SO/ACs is a required
>> step in the policy development process. The PDP WG will need to
>> collectively work together to establish a set of questions to pose to the
>> SO/ACs and it has been preliminarily agreed to by the WG that more than one
>> set of questions (based on the Tracks) is likely to be needed during these
>> outreach efforts.
>>
>> Geographic names are discussed in Section 4.3.1: Reserved Names of the
>> Final Issue Report linked above.
>>
>> Best,
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>> Date: Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 1:59 PM
>> To: Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
>> Cc: Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <
>> gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Proposed Agenda for 4 April 2016
>>
>> Dear Jeff
>> Thank you very much for the advice
>>  One of the head ache that we have had and still having in the GAC is
>> Geographic Name
>>  We have also another head ache which is Geographic Identification
>> WHERE THESE THINGS ARE ADDRESSED
>> Regards
>> Kavouss
>>
>> 2016-04-03 22:57 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Dear Jeff
>>> Thank you very much for the advice
>>>  One of the head ack
>>>
>>> 2016-04-03 21:02 GMT+02:00 Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>:
>>>
>>>> Dear Kavouss,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We have noted all of those great suggestions from the previous call and
>>>> have them as action items.  Many of them relate to Track 3 which we will
>>>> address at a later point when we split up into different subteams to work
>>>> on the different tracks.  I would also like to remind the Working Group to
>>>> review the ICANN Final Implementation Report at
>>>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/program-review-29jan16-en.pdf.
>>>> That may address some of the topics you reference below.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On our next call, the plan is to review the 2007 high level principles,
>>>> make sure we think they are still relevant (or whether they need some
>>>> changes) and see if there are any high level overall principles we should
>>>> be coming up with to govern the introduction of subsequent TLDs.  Then,
>>>> time permitting, we will go into the first one or two overall questions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope that helps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Jeffrey J. Neuman*
>>>>
>>>> *Senior Vice President *|*Valideus USA*| *Com Laude USA*
>>>>
>>>> 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
>>>>
>>>> Mclean, VA 22102, United States
>>>>
>>>> E: jeff.neuman at valideus.com or jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
>>>>
>>>> T: +1.703.635.7514
>>>>
>>>> M: +1.202.549.5079
>>>>
>>>> @Jintlaw
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:*gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
>>>> gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kavouss Arasteh via
>>>> Gnso-newgtld-wg
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 2, 2016 3:21 AM
>>>> *To:* Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>
>>>> *Cc:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Proposed Agenda for 4 April 2016
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Steve,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for the message
>>>>
>>>> At the last meeting of the Group,I raised the need to receive a report
>>>> from ICANN on difficuilties, shorthcoming, defficiencies and problems
>>>> encountred in implementing the first gTLD rould.
>>>>
>>>> I also implicitly suggested that SOs/ACs , in particular, GAC be
>>>> formally asked to make a list of the above mentioned issues (difficuilties,
>>>> shorthcoming, defficiencies and problems encountred in implementing the
>>>> first gTLD rould) and any proposed remedial actions
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, I did suggest that a list of identical strings, and singular,
>>>> plural strings and issue of different meaning of a string in different
>>>> lanuages  ,the issue of Autions, advantages and disadvantages be also
>>>> addressed.
>>>>
>>>> May you pls advise on these also
>>>>
>>>> Tks
>>>>
>>>> Kavouss .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-04-01 20:41 GMT+02:00 Steve Chan via Gnso-newgtld-wg <
>>>> gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Dear WG Members,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent
>>>> Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday 4 April 2016 at 22:00 UTC.
>>>>
>>>>    1. Review agenda
>>>>    2. Roll Call/SoIs
>>>>    3. Discussion on response to Dr. Crocker (Draft letter to be
>>>>    distributed by Steve Coates)
>>>>    4. Discussion regarding principles from 2007 Final Report (excerpt
>>>>    attached)
>>>>    5. Discussion on Subject 1: Should there in fact be new gTLDs?
>>>>    6. Discussion on Subject 2 (Time Permitting): TLD
>>>>    Types/Differentiation
>>>>    7. AOB
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Steven Chan*
>>>> Sr. Policy Manager
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *ICANN*12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>>>>
>>>> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>>>> steve.chan at icann.org
>>>>
>>>> direct: +1.310.301.3886
>>>> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>>>>
>>>> tel: +1.310.301.5800
>>>>
>>>> fax: +1.310.823.8649
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
>>>> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg

-- 
Richard Padilla MSc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160404/1a268de3/attachment-0001.html>