[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Mp3, Attendance & AC Chat from New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG 01 June 2016
Michelle DeSmyter
michelle.desmyter at icann.org
Thu Jun 2 01:59:25 UTC 2016
Dear All,
Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call held on Wednesday, 01 June 2016 at 22:00 UTC.
MP3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-01jun16-en.mp3 <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-01jun16-en.mp3>
<http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-16may16-en.mp3> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-09may16-en.mp3http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-09may16-en.mp3>
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov>
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/
Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/9xGOAw
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Michelle DeSmyter
-------------------------------
Adobe Connect chat transcript for Wednesday, 01 June 2016
Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG call on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 at 22:00 UTC.
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):90 minutes?
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):I mean, is the call scheduled to last 90 minutes?
Steve Chan:Yes, scheduled to last for up to 90 minutes
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):Danke
Steve Chan:De nada
Steve Chan:Or according to Google Translate, Bitte
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):Steve, I have a technical question: Adob asked me to donwload an app (in Safari) and it does not work eversince. While Adobe-Chrome does not activate my mic. Have you heard similar complaints?
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):it has been like this for a week or so
Steve Chan:I have not, but those complaints would probably not go to me. I had to download new Java plugins for Firefox.
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):well, then may i please just ask for a phone bridge to +506-8837-7176 justin case I may need it?
Steve Chan:Sure, I'll let Michelle know.
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):thanks
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):sorry
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):terrible connections
Freida Tallon (.sky):Good evening all
Jeff Neuman:Its funny when all you hear is silence....I hope you all heard me just state the 2 minute warning
Steve Chan:Confirmed!
Jeff Neuman:funny story while we wait.....i used the phrase " I will be out of pocket for the next few hours" today and apparently that is an american expression. A non-american asked me if that meant I was out of money :)
Jeff Neuman:To which I responded Yes, I will not be reachable by phone and I am also out of money ;)
Rubens Kuhl:Jeff is out of money due to USD 1 per "round" ...
Richard Padilla:Hi all
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):Jeff will never learn
Steve Chan:Avri, at least for me, you're a bit faint and distant sounding?
Jeff Neuman:me too
Steve Chan:Much better!
Steve Coates (Twitter):I have to drop off for a family emegency. Apologies.
Jeff Neuman:Sure. Steve hope everything is ok
Rubens Kuhl:What's the target date for releasing the CC1 document ?
Greg Shatan:Hello all. Sorry to be late.
Jeff Neuman:By the document deadline for the helsinki meeting
Jeff Neuman:which I believe is June 10th
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):yes
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):thnaks you avri
Steve Chan:no problem
Rubens Kuhl:Considering the CC1 documents gets out June 10th, what would be deadline for responses ?
Steve Chan:@Rubens, as noted in the PDP Manual, 35 days are allotted
Rubens Kuhl:Tks
Steve Chan:35 days at a minimum :)
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Hi. Have been on the call for a bit, but was having Adobe Connect issues.
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):@Kristina Adobe connect.sucks as of late
Rubens Kuhl:Adobe working for me without issues for the last few weeks...
Susan Payne:I thought we were going to ask the HAC specifically to identify ways and what they are working on. or is that in he cover letter?
Susan Payne:sorry typo GAC
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):just lost the bridge
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):it was not an open issue
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):just a clarification
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):thank you
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team): sorry I have no mic
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):bad echo for me
Jeff Neuman:big echo
Susan Payne:identify WGs and what they are working on. apologies for typo/autocorrect issues
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):Disclaimer: Carlos didn´t mean to be a pain in the neck, but was aked to take a look at the draft letter from the point of view of English as a second language. Carlos normally respects Avri´s drafting fully. :)
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):jajajajaja
Steve Chan:@Susan, we can customize for the GAC. DId you have specific changes in mind, perhaps in section 3?
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Would the absence of a continuing mechanism be anticompetitive or likely to have an anticompetitive effect? (or something along those lines)
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):works for me. thank you
Steve Chan:Just a reminder to participants that the CC1 document is available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gh8ugZAomD2AGNymmVRgKGP9TA2KQ7BkQbrRAEvsrxs/edit
Steve Chan:And Avri is making real-time edits during the meeting.
Jeff Neuman:I agree that someone will need to review for grammar as lots of wordsmithing going on...including by me :)
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):Question is type=categroies???
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):right now in this question is a little confusing
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):thanks Jeff
Jeff Neuman:I am good with that "type" of change throughout
Robin Gross:of course the GAC isn't the only group who can categorize in this process.
Jeff Neuman:Understood
Jeff Neuman:I think so
Samantha Demetriou:Maybe and/or rather than and?
Samantha Demetriou:Yes, sorry!
Vaibhav Aggarwal:redoubt q
Vaibhav Aggarwal:redundant
Vaibhav Aggarwal:for the pent up demand
Steve Chan:I think we should enummerate the questions in each section
Steve Chan:yes
Vaibhav Aggarwal:t he first one with artificial one
Vaibhav Aggarwal:demand and scarcity
Greg Shatan:I don't think they're the same.
Vaibhav Aggarwal:right
Greg Shatan:Not sure there is such a thing as 'artificial demand"....
Vaibhav Aggarwal:the wait time is there anywhichways
Robin Gross:"unmet demand" might be better than "pent up demand"
Greg Shatan:Although one might say that defensive registrations are a form of "artificial demand"
Greg Shatan:I kind of like pent up....
Robin Gross:I don't feel strongly about it, just a suggestion.
Greg Shatan:Agree they are not synonymous
Robin Gross:don't mind.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):thx for restating I found the last speaker hard to hear ... ok to delete
Kristina Rosette (Amazon Registry):Have to drop for another meeting. I'll read the transcript to catch up on what I miss.
Vaibhav Aggarwal:pent up demand is demand created due to external forces
Rubens Kuhl:Have to drop sooner today as well. Bye all!
Greg Shatan:No, pent up demand is demand that exists but has no outlet.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):yup
Vaibhav Aggarwal:so this could be on artificial and pent up and artificial scarcity
Greg Shatan:Those are 3 different concepts.
Steve Chan:Correct
Vaibhav Aggarwal:if it is important for the sake of redundancy, we can ask three separate questions then, depending on the purpose it is serving
Greg Shatan:I don't think there is any redundancy.
Jeff Neuman:What wol dyou propose for the 3 questions?
Jeff Neuman:oops...what would you propose
Greg Shatan:On a related note, I recommend listening to "Pent-Up House" by Sonny Rollins; https://youtu.be/yIlpEnsa2d8
Vaibhav Aggarwal:related parties
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):Applicants and users are summarized as conumers in CCT
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):Consumers=Applicants + Useres
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):about the 3rd parties????
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):its in our charter
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):right
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):applicants, users and others
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):and important others
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team)::)
Jeff Neuman:ok
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):other parties
Greg Shatan:Good point -- this should be focused on the application process, not the PDP process.
Carlos Raul (CCT Review Team):it is clear, thanks
Steve Chan:I do not necessarily have an opinion one way or the other, but just wanted to try and provide context.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):agree Jeff
Vaibhav Aggarwal:sure. will do.
Richard Padilla:got to go bye for now
Philip Corwin:ciao all
Jeff Neuman:I think once the changes are made, we can review for flow and "understandability". I think we will be fine.
Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Sorry I have to leave now as well BYE
Jeff Neuman:Lets just get a commitment from everyone to work on the list PLEASE :)
Vaibhav Aggarwal::-)
Christa Taylor:Thank-you
Robin Gross:thanks, bye!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160602/95447ceb/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Attendance New gTLD Sub 01 June Sheet1.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 32863 bytes
Desc: Attendance New gTLD Sub 01 June Sheet1.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160602/95447ceb/AttendanceNewgTLDSub01JuneSheet1-0001.pdf>
More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg
mailing list