[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC

[Steve Chan]

Paul,

If I am not mistaken, Jeff Neuman in going through the slides he prepared,
noted that using the term ³workstream² was less than ideal for the reason
you noted, so your concern is shared. When this PDP WG establishes its Work
Plan, we will be sure to remain cognizant of this issue and settle on naming
conventions carefully.

Best,
Steve 

From:  <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Paul McGrady
(Policy) via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Reply-To:  "Paul McGrady (Policy)" <policy at paulmcgrady.com>
Date:  Friday, March 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM
To:  Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Cc:  "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC

 
Hi Julie & Everyone:
 
I¹m a bit concerned about our labeling.  We are calling these ³workstreams²
which would make great sense if that term was not already enshrined in
Transition work.  I¹m concerned that we could dilute the clarity that the
term ³Workstream 2² already has in the community and could lead to confusion
as we do reporting to the Council on our work.
 
Could we, at this early stage, rename these  Perhaps Work Lane 1, 2, 3, etc?
 
Best
Paul (speaking in role as Council liaison)
 
 
Paul McGrady
policy at paulmcgrady.com
+1-312-882-5020
GNSO Councilor for the IPC
 
 
 

From:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund via
Gnso-newgtld-wg
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 12:44 PM
To: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
 

Dear WG Members,

 

Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent
Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 28 March 2016 at 16:00 UTC.

 

1. Review the Agenda

2. Roll Call/Statements of Interest

3. Walk Through of Subjects/Issues

   1. Address any further clarifying questions on Work Streams 1 and 2.

   2. Work Streams 3, 4, and 5

4. If time permits ‹ Letter from Steve Crocker to the PDP WG and CCT RT Re:
ALAC and GAC concerns regarding the effectiveness of the Public Interest
Commitments (PICs) for sensitive new gTLDs (attached)
5. AOB

 

Kind regards,

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160325/dc1665cc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4534 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160325/dc1665cc/smime.p7s>