[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC

[avri doria]

Hi,

I sympathize with the goal of having consistent terminology.

The problem with WS2 if I am afraid it is becoming a well known global
brand and will confuse people (can't believe I am using such an
explanation).

I think subgroups is probably already the standard term.

avri

On 25-Mar-16 19:19, Austin, Donna via Gnso-newgtld-wg wrote:
>
> I have no opposition to using Work Stream. I think it makes sense to
> have consistent terminology across working groups, so have no
> opposition to using a term that is easily understood.
>
>  
>
> The differentiation is that this will be the Subsequent Procedures PDP
> Work Streams, which I think is easily enough understood by most.
>
>  
>
> Work Step or Work Lane don’t really resonate with me.
>
>  
>
> Donna
>
>  
>
> *Donna Austin**:****Neustar, Inc.**
> *Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
>
> *Cell:***+1.310.890.9655 *Email: *donna.austin at neustar.biz
> <mailto:donna.austin at neustar.biz>
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
> the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
> and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient
> you have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify me immediately and delete the original message.
>
> *Follow Neustar:*  cid:image001.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0 Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc> 
>  cid:image002.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0 LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349> 
>  cid:image003.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0 Twitter
> <http://www.twitter.com/neustar>
>
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:*gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul McGrady
> (Policy) via Gnso-newgtld-wg
> *Sent:* Friday, 25 March 2016 2:31 PM
> *To:* 'Kavouss Arasteh' <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
>
>  
>
> I like Work Step just fine!  Thanks Kavouss.
>
>  
>
> Best,
>
> Paul
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:*Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 25, 2016 02:07 PM
> *To:* Paul McGrady (Policy)
> *Cc:* Julie Hedlund; gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
>
>  
>
> Dear All
>
> I agree with Paul that we need to be mindful to avoid using any terms
> which could eventually mislead or confuse the community.
>
> I suggest alternative to " work stream" the terms" work step" 
>
> Regards
>
> Kavouss 
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On 25 Mar 2016, at 19:03, Paul McGrady (Policy) via Gnso-newgtld-wg
> <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>> wrote:
>
>      
>
>     Hi Julie & Everyone:
>
>      
>
>     I’m a bit concerned about our labeling.  We are calling these
>     “workstreams” which would make great sense if that term was not
>     already enshrined in Transition work.  I’m concerned that we could
>     dilute the clarity that the term “Workstream 2” already has in the
>     community and could lead to confusion as we do reporting to the
>     Council on our work. 
>
>      
>
>     Could we, at this early stage, rename these  Perhaps Work Lane 1,
>     2, 3, etc?
>
>      
>
>     Best
>
>     Paul (speaking in role as Council liaison)
>
>      
>
>      
>
>     Paul McGrady
>
>     policy at paulmcgrady.com <mailto:policy at paulmcgrady.com>
>
>     +1-312-882-5020
>
>     GNSO Councilor for the IPC
>
>      
>
>      
>
>      
>
>     *From:*gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org
>     <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org>
>     [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Julie
>     Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg
>     *Sent:* Friday, March 25, 2016 12:44 PM
>     *To:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
>     *Subject:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
>
>      
>
>     Dear WG Members,
>
>      
>
>     Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent
>     Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 28 March 2016 at 16:00
>     UTC.
>
>      
>
>     1. Review the Agenda
>
>     2. Roll Call/Statements of Interest
>
>     3. Walk Through of Subjects/Issues
>
>        1. Address any further clarifying questions on Work Streams 1
>     and 2.
>
>        2. Work Streams 3, 4, and 5
>
>     4. If time permits — Letter from Steve Crocker to the PDP WG and
>     CCT RT Re: ALAC and GAC concerns regarding the effectiveness of
>     the Public Interest Commitments (PICs) for sensitive new gTLDs
>     (attached)
>
>     5. AOB
>
>      
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     Julie
>
>      
>
>     Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
>     Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dnewgtld-2Dwg&d=CwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=U0ekIkZtdkKiG0pLF_EWPTg-xgnTpkbDwqnl_DLqev4&s=cTUOKsAPoBDrww3Q8HaSkrMmO_4K2CowVExnJlKFP0U&e=>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus