[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sat Mar 26 16:28:44 UTC 2016


Dear all
I still believe that work stream is is famous terms used by CCWG Accountability Folks
Work Step is less confused
Regards
Kavouss 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 26 Mar 2016, at 14:18, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Well said and my +1; Every effort to avoid increasing terminologies within ICANN should be intentionally pursued. New comers are really having a great deal of following terminologies before the substance.
> 
> Cheers!
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
> 
>> On 26 Mar 2016 00:21, "Austin, Donna via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>> I have no opposition to using Work Stream. I think it makes sense to have consistent terminology across working groups, so have no opposition to using a term that is easily understood.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The differentiation is that this will be the Subsequent Procedures PDP Work Streams, which I think is easily enough understood by most.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Work Step or Work Lane don’t really resonate with me.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Donna
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Donna Austin: Neustar, Inc.
>> Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
>> 
>> Cell: +1.310.890.9655 Email: donna.austin at neustar.biz
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message.
>> 
>> Follow Neustar:    Facebook    LinkedIn   <image003.png> Twitter
>> 
>> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul McGrady (Policy) via Gnso-newgtld-wg
>> Sent: Friday, 25 March 2016 2:31 PM
>> To: 'Kavouss Arasteh' <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I like Work Step just fine!  Thanks Kavouss.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com] 
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 02:07 PM
>> To: Paul McGrady (Policy)
>> Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Dear All
>> 
>> I agree with Paul that we need to be mindful to avoid using any terms which could eventually mislead or confuse the community.
>> 
>> I suggest alternative to " work stream" the terms" work step" 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Kavouss 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> 
>> On 25 Mar 2016, at 19:03, Paul McGrady (Policy) via Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hi Julie & Everyone:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I’m a bit concerned about our labeling.  We are calling these “workstreams” which would make great sense if that term was not already enshrined in Transition work.  I’m concerned that we could dilute the clarity that the term “Workstream 2” already has in the community and could lead to confusion as we do reporting to the Council on our work. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Could we, at this early stage, rename these  Perhaps Work Lane 1, 2, 3, etc?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>> Paul (speaking in role as Council liaison)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Paul McGrady
>> 
>> policy at paulmcgrady.com
>> 
>> +1-312-882-5020
>> 
>> GNSO Councilor for the IPC
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 12:44 PM
>> To: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Dear WG Members,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 28 March 2016 at 16:00 UTC.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 1. Review the Agenda
>> 
>> 2. Roll Call/Statements of Interest
>> 
>> 3. Walk Through of Subjects/Issues
>> 
>>    1. Address any further clarifying questions on Work Streams 1 and 2.
>> 
>>    2. Work Streams 3, 4, and 5
>> 
>> 4. If time permits — Letter from Steve Crocker to the PDP WG and CCT RT Re: ALAC and GAC concerns regarding the effectiveness of the Public Interest Commitments (PICs) for sensitive new gTLDs (attached)
>> 
>> 5. AOB
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Julie
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160326/a78a4ca8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 792 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160326/a78a4ca8/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160326/a78a4ca8/image002-0001.png>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list