[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC

Mon Mar 28 15:55:05 UTC 2016

Dear Jeff
Dear Paul
Dear All,
I also agree to use either Track or Step .However, Track is more close and
equivalent to stream
Thus could we all agree to use Track
Regards
Kavouss

2016-03-28 17:25 GMT+02:00 Jeff Neuman via Gnso-newgtld-wg <
gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>:

> Sorry for not responding sooner, but I took a couple of days off.  What I
> we refer to all of these as "tracks".  Track 1, Track 2, etc?  I will try
> that during the call today to see if it works.
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA
> 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
> Mclean, VA 22102, United States
> E: jeff.neuman at valideus.com or jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
> T: +1.703.635.7514
> M: +1.202.549.5079
> @Jintlaw
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of avri doria via
> Gnso-newgtld-wg
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 8:19 AM
> To: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
>
> Hi,
>
> I sympathize with the goal of having consistent terminology.
>
> The problem with WS2 if I am afraid it is becoming a well known global
> brand and will confuse people (can't believe I am using such an
> explanation).
>
> I think subgroups is probably already the standard term.
>
> avri
>
> On 25-Mar-16 19:19, Austin, Donna via Gnso-newgtld-wg wrote:
> >
> > I have no opposition to using Work Stream. I think it makes sense to
> > have consistent terminology across working groups, so have no
> > opposition to using a term that is easily understood.
> >
> >
> >
> > The differentiation is that this will be the Subsequent Procedures PDP
> > Work Streams, which I think is easily enough understood by most.
> >
> >
> >
> > Work Step or Work Lane don't really resonate with me.
> >
> >
> >
> > Donna
> >
> >
> >
> > *Donna Austin**:****Neustar, Inc.**
> > *Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
> >
> > *Cell:***+1.310.890.9655 *Email: *donna.austin at neustar.biz
> > <mailto:donna.austin at neustar.biz>
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> >
> > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
> > the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
> > and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient
> > you have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
> > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> > notify me immediately and delete the original message.
> >
> > *Follow Neustar:*  cid:image001.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0 Facebook
> > <http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc>
> >  cid:image002.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0 LinkedIn
> > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349>
> >  cid:image003.png at 01CC3CD3.5F595DC0 Twitter
> > <http://www.twitter.com/neustar>
> >
> > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:*gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org
> > [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul McGrady
> > (Policy) via Gnso-newgtld-wg
> > *Sent:* Friday, 25 March 2016 2:31 PM
> > *To:* 'Kavouss Arasteh' <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> > *Cc:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
> >
> >
> >
> > I like Work Step just fine!  Thanks Kavouss.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:*Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
> > *Sent:* Friday, March 25, 2016 02:07 PM
> > *To:* Paul McGrady (Policy)
> > *Cc:* Julie Hedlund; gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> > <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear All
> >
> > I agree with Paul that we need to be mindful to avoid using any terms
> > which could eventually mislead or confuse the community.
> >
> > I suggest alternative to " work stream" the terms" work step"
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Kavouss
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >
> > On 25 Mar 2016, at 19:03, Paul McGrady (Policy) via Gnso-newgtld-wg
> > <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >     Hi Julie & Everyone:
> >
> >
> >
> >     I'm a bit concerned about our labeling.  We are calling these
> >     "workstreams" which would make great sense if that term was not
> >     already enshrined in Transition work.  I'm concerned that we could
> >     dilute the clarity that the term "Workstream 2" already has in the
> >     community and could lead to confusion as we do reporting to the
> >     Council on our work.
> >
> >
> >
> >     Could we, at this early stage, rename these  Perhaps Work Lane 1,
> >     2, 3, etc?
> >
> >
> >
> >     Best
> >
> >     Paul (speaking in role as Council liaison)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     Paul McGrady
> >
> >     policy at paulmcgrady.com <mailto:policy at paulmcgrady.com>
> >
> >     +1-312-882-5020
> >
> >     GNSO Councilor for the IPC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     *From:*gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org
> >     <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org>
> >     [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Julie
> >     Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg
> >     *Sent:* Friday, March 25, 2016 12:44 PM
> >     *To:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> >     *Subject:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda 28 March 1600 UTC
> >
> >
> >
> >     Dear WG Members,
> >
> >
> >
> >     Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent
> >     Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 28 March 2016 at 16:00
> >     UTC.
> >
> >
> >
> >     1. Review the Agenda
> >
> >     2. Roll Call/Statements of Interest
> >
> >     3. Walk Through of Subjects/Issues
> >
> >        1. Address any further clarifying questions on Work Streams 1
> >     and 2.
> >
> >        2. Work Streams 3, 4, and 5
> >
> >     4. If time permits - Letter from Steve Crocker to the PDP WG and
> >     CCT RT Re: ALAC and GAC concerns regarding the effectiveness of
> >     the Public Interest Commitments (PICs) for sensitive new gTLDs
> >     (attached)
> >
> >     5. AOB
> >
> >
> >
> >     Kind regards,
> >
> >     Julie
> >
> >
> >
> >     Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> >     Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> >     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
> >
> > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mai
> > lman_listinfo_gnso-2Dnewgtld-2Dwg&d=CwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=
> > 4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=U0ekIkZtdkKiG0pLF_EWPTg-
> > xgnTpkbDwqnl_DLqev4&s=cTUOKsAPoBDrww3Q8HaSkrMmO_4K2CowVExnJlKFP0U&e=>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> > Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20160328/195ee1c6/attachment-0001.html>