[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Discussion Notes/Actions: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG 02 May 2016

[avri doria]

Thank you for this.

avri


On 03-May-16 20:59, Julie Hedlund wrote:
> Dear PDP WG members,
>
> Please see below the discussion notes and action items captured by
> staff from the meeting on 02 May.  These high-level notes are designed
> to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and
> are not meant as a substitute for the transcript.  The MP3,
> transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the
> wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/1.+WG+Meetings. 
>
> *Action Item re: Subject Reviews — *PDP WG Members should review the
> Google Docs as follows (and referenced below):
>
> 1. New gTLD - 2007 Principles and Recommendations
> — See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15_0TRWzFIaLgO3QlfYH_0ZtOlMKm7SEjsHif4Oi2iZM/edit?usp=sharing. 
> 2. Subject 1: Should there in fact be additional new gTLDs in the
> future - Pros and Cons —
> See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/111-IBO9zKMXPorvBxoot8uTdLPyjPesYCha6D0slKoM/edit?usp=sharing. Different
> TLD
> Types: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mA_hTUhLhJSsfcmoQwREtUqxykZ5KfJffzJAAhEvNlA/edit?usp=sharing. 
> 3. Subject 2: Should the subsequent procedures be rounds?  Pros and
> Cons —
> See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p7RqPPNafMOViLyG-y_isLeYkcqsjHLIgLEXTOPKp_s/edit?usp=sharing.
> 4. Subject 3: Predictability Pros and Cons — See:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qwbdz_iwAHVVpJwm2RPJK5w07QXxjM9QNn0NAyquVT8/edit?usp=sharing.  
>
> Kind regards,
> Julie
> Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
>
> *Discussion Notes/Actions: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG
> Meeting, 02 May 2016*
>
> /1. Review of action items (https://community.icann.org/x/A0WAAw)/
>
> *Action Items:*
> 1) Geographic distribution/rotation of meetings: Consider rotation for
> APAC. Staff to review/edit and then share Excel document.
> 2) Letter to Chairs to collect statements:  Send out a communication
> and get as many statements as possible.  Include link in the
> communication on overall issues.  Staff will prepare a draft letter.
> 3) Staff to send around a note to CC1 volunteers re: next steps
>
> /2. Subject discussion: 4.2.7 Applications Assessed in
> Rounds, continued (Final Issue Report excerpt available on Wiki
> here: https://community.icann.org/x/Jz2AAw)/
>
> *Action Item:* PDP WG members should review the Google Doc
> at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p7RqPPNafMOViLyG-y_isLeYkcqsjHLIgLEXTOPKp_s/edit?usp=sharing.
>
> /3. Subject discussion: 4.2.2 Predictability, continued (Final Issue
> Report excerpt available on Wiki
> here: https://community.icann.org/x/HT2AAw) /
> *
> *
> *Action Item: *PDP WG members should review the Google Doc
> at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qwbdz_iwAHVVpJwm2RPJK5w07QXxjM9QNn0NAyquVT8/edit?usp=sharing.
>
> *Question:* Prioritize the pros and cons?  Suggest letting the
> Drafting Teams that are putting these into questions for the community
> consider priority.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus