[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposal to Extend CC2 Deadline

[Justine Chew]

Jeff,

No objections to an extension as proposed, for GAC and everyone else.

Just out of curiosity, can you / staff please enlighten us as to how many
comments have been submitted since 22 Mar? i.e. Would that be the single
comment submitted by one Jannik Skou?

Thanks,

Justine Chew


*​Greg S: "The Avri", really? Lol.​*

-----

On 19 April 2017 at 06:36, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Jeff and The Avri,
>
> No objections to an extension -- quite the opposite.  We will need all the
> time we can get to respond on behalf of the IPC.  One of our members shared
> their individual response -- it was 34 pages long.....
>
> Greg
>
>
> *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Austin, Donna <Donna.Austin at neustar.biz>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> No objection to extending the deadline as suggested.
>>
>>
>>
>> Donna
>>
>> *From:* gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounce
>> s at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Neuman
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 18, 2017 2:11 AM
>> *To:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> *Subject:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposal to Extend CC2 Deadline
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Last week the Avri and I received a formal request from the Governmental
>> Advisory Committee to “consider an extension of the deadline for public
>> comments to the Community Comment 2 (CC2) questionnaire.”  In light of the
>> extensive nature of the questionnaire as well as the desire to get as many
>> responses as possible, Avri and I are inclined to agree to this request.
>> In order to be fair, we believe the extension should be applied to
>> everyone, not just the GAC.
>>
>>
>>
>> Working backwards, it is our desire to have a summary of all of the
>> public comments to discuss at ICANN59 at the end of June.  The document
>> deadline for that meeting is 15 business days prior to the meeting
>> (beginning of June).  In order to give staff some time to compile the
>> summary in time for the document deadline, we are proposing *May 22,
>> 2017* as the new date for comments to be due.  This would be a 3 week
>> extension for the entire community.
>>
>>
>>
>> I know this is asking for quick turnaround, but please let us know by no
>> later than *April 20th *if you have any strong objections to this
>> proposal.  Otherwise, we will let the community know about the extension on
>> April 21st.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Jeffrey J. Neuman*
>>
>> *Senior Vice President *|*Valideus USA* | *Com Laude USA*
>>
>> 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
>>
>> Mclean, VA 22102, United States
>>
>> E: *jeff.neuman at valideus.com <jeff.neuman at valideus.com>* or *jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
>> <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>*
>>
>> T: +1.703.635.7514 <(703)%20635-7514>
>>
>> M: +1.202.549.5079 <(202)%20549-5079>
>>
>> @Jintlaw
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20170420/26d7710d/attachment.html>