[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Please Review by 24 April: SubPro Comments - CCT-RT Draft Report and Recommendations

Aikman-Scalese, Anne AAikman at lrrc.com
Mon Apr 24 16:46:55 UTC 2017


I see Jon.  The funny thing is that I thought the tone was actually in the opposite direction.  To me it sounded like – “if you expect us to take your recommendations seriously, you are going to have to define your terms”.    I thought that was a bit cheeky.

Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office


520.879.4725 fax

AAikman at lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>

_____________________________

[cid:image003.png at 01D2BCDF.B481CCA0]

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/>



From: Jon Nevett [mailto:jon at donuts.email]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 9:42 AM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: Emily Barabas; gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Please Review by 24 April: SubPro Comments - CCT-RT Draft Report and Recommendations



Thanks Anne.  My point isn't that the CCT shouldn't affect the policy-making process.  It should.  My point is that we shouldn't leave the impression with them or anyone else that the CCT is able to dictate the policy-making process.

Best,

Jon


On Apr 24, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>> wrote:

Jon,
I would have to pose a question about the purpose of the Reviews.  What is the purpose of a Review if it is not meant to affect the policy-making process?  Wouldn’t it just be so much noise – in one ear and out the other of the GNSO?  Admittedly input is just input but isn’t this an essential element of the Multi-Stakeholder model?
Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office


520.879.4725 fax

AAikman at lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>

_____________________________

<image003.png>

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/>



From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org]On Behalf Of Jon Nevett
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 6:33 AM
To: Emily Barabas
Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Please Review by 24 April: SubPro Comments - CCT-RT Draft Report and Recommendations

I think that we give way too much deference to the CCT-RT report in the quote from the draft letter below.  While we absolutely should take the appointed review group's input into our deliberations, does it really matter if the review group expects us to strictly interpret and implement its recommendations, for example?  It is the GNSO that is tasked with recommending policy to the Board under ICANN's Bylaws.  I don't think that we should be asking another group whether it thinks we have latitude to suggest alternative solutions that meet or do not meet the spirit of its recommendations.   JN

"It would be helpful for the CCT-RT to clarify how strictly it expects the PDP WG to interpret and adhere to the language of the recommendations. To what extent is it appropriate for the Working Group to recommend alternative mechanisms or policies that meet the spirit of the CCT-RT recommendations? Alternately, does the CCT-RT view the obligation as more limited -- that the PDP must consider the recommendation but may end up with an outcome that is inconsistent or conflicting with CCT-RT recommendations?

If the CCT-RT expects the Working Group to strictly interpret and implement the language of the recommendations, it would be helpful to have clear definitions for terminology used in the document."

On Apr 21, 2017, at 7:39 AM, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>> wrote:

Dear all,

Gentle reminder –

Please review and provide feedback on the SubPro draft comments for the CCT-RT Report prior to the full Working Group meeting on Monday 24 April at 20:00 UTC. The draft comments are available here:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LC-1-Z2auN2XTSJXyW34eWnGgNuuDInIOeJ1TcZ7z58/edit?usp=sharing.

Kind regards,
Emily

From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>
Date: Tuesday 18 April 2017 at 21:54
To: "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: Please Review by 24 April: SubPro Comments - CCT-RT Draft Report and Recommendations

Dear all,

The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG leadership team has prepared draft comments in response to the CCT-RT Draft Report and Recommendations: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LC-1-Z2auN2XTSJXyW34eWnGgNuuDInIOeJ1TcZ7z58/edit?usp=sharing. The draft text draws from WG discussion with representatives of the CCT-RT on our 10 April Working Group call.

Please provide feedback and suggested edits prior to the full Working Group meeting on Monday 24 April at 20:00 UTC. For those who do not use Google Docs, a Microsoft Word version is attached to this email.

The WG will consider proposed revisions during the 24 April call, after which the leadership team will finalize and submit the text. The deadline for public comments on the CCT-RT Draft Report is 27 April 2017.

Please note that the purpose of this comment is to pose clarifying questions and make suggestions about the language of the Draft Recommendations to help the CCT-RT refine the text for the Final Report. The goal is not to provide substantive responses to the Recommendations, as the text of the Report is not yet final.

Please let the leadership team know if you have any questions.

Kind regards,
Emily


Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist
ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
Email: emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org> | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg


________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.


________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20170424/eb5d91b5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6488 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20170424/eb5d91b5/image003-0001.png>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list