[Gnso-newgtld-wg] [EXTERNAL] Re: Fwd: Letter from the RySG's RSP Discussion Group

Thu Aug 3 04:34:41 UTC 2017

Agree with Jeff's position (as confirmed by Kristina) and also agree with
Michael and Samantha's suggestion in principle; taking into account
Carton's input, I would suggest flipping the suggested response to the
RySG's RSP DG by sharing with them this WG's prevailing timeline and
inviting their input as their discussion relate to this WG's work per our
timeline. That way, we get input which hopefully does not disrupt this WG's
timeline.

Thanks,

Justine
-----

On 1 August 2017 at 01:18, Austin, Donna via Gnso-newgtld-wg <
gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org> wrote:

> Agree with Sam and Michael.
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-
> bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Samantha Demetriou
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 19, 2017 7:22 AM
> *To:* Michael Flemming <flemming at brightsconsulting.com>; Carlton Samuels <
> carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Fwd: Letter from the RySG's
> RSP Discussion Group
>
>
>
> I think Michael’s suggestion is a good one. Assigning liaisons to this or
> other groups seems like it would be overly cumbersome and would result in
> creating more work with little added value. To a point Jeff made (I think
> on a different iteration of this thread), I agree that we can continue to
> rely on WG participants to report back to their respective stakeholder
> groups and constituencies and keep them informed.
>
>
>
> Responding to the RySG discussion group and letting them know exactly what
> areas the PDP WG would like input on would be a great way to streamline
> future communications and help avoid duplicating work. Having people who
> participate in both the discussion group and the PDP WG will also help with
> this, and I know we have a handful of engaged folks already doing so. A
> further suggestion would be to include in our response a request for the
> timeline on which the discussion group plans to cover the PDP WG’s topics
> of interest, to help the PDP WG leadership continue to keep this group’s
> schedules up to date.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Samantha
>
>
>
> *From: *<gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Michael Flemming
> <flemming at brightsconsulting.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 1:33 AM
> *To: *Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Fwd: Letter from the RySG's RSP
> Discussion Group
>
>
>
> I  agree that these efforts can be done in parallel with one another and
> while there are objectives in common, the underlying objectives are
> different.
>
> Rather than establishing liaisons to work between groups, it may help if
> we send a formal reply back to the RSP DG. Within the reply we could
> outline the relevant work tracks where specific developments of the RSP DG
> may feed into further policy discussion within our group. I believe that
> would serve as a valid thank you and response.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Michael Flemming
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Carlton Samuels <
> carlton.samuels at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As I understand it the RSP DG offered to analyze and forward to the SubPro
> WG  a "precis" of the analyzed outputs from their work streams.  That on
> its face would be a good thing.
>
>
>
> However, looking at the work areas as described, I do not see all six (6)
> as relevant to the work of this SubPro WG.
>
>
>
> The RSP DG would be well advised to not only send the summary of their
> analysis but - assuming there is not one already embedded - a body to the
> WG for a deep dive of their summary, as relevant.
>
>
>
> -Carlton
>
>
>
> ==============================
> *Carlton A Samuels*
>
> *Mobile: 876-818-1799 <(876)%20818-1799> Strategy, Planning, Governance,
> Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
> wrote:
>
> Thank you jeff. Some groups  from this discussion group will certainly be
> aligned with for instance, our track 1. May be the best way to go forward
> with this alignment is to have “liaisons” working in both groups to
> guarantee real exchange of ideas and avoid duplication of effort.
>
> Best to all
>
> *Vanda Scartezini*
>
> *Polo Consultores Associados*
>
> *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
>
> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
>
> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <+55%2011%203266-6253>*
>
> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <+55%2011%2098181-1464> *
>
> *Sorry for any typos. *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Jeff Neuman <
> jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 08:56
> *To: *"gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Fwd: Letter from the RySG's RSP Discussion
> Group
>
>
>
> Forwarding this on to the entire New gTLD Working Group as an FYI.  This
> most likely affects both Work Tracks 1 and 2, but I thought everyone should
> see it.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
>
> Senior Vice President
>
> Com Laude USA / Valideus USA
>
> 1751 Pinnacle Dr., Suite 600
>
> McLean, VA 22102
>
> Jeff.Neuman at comlaude.com
>
> +1 (202) 549-5079 <(202)%20549-5079>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* "svg at milathan.ltd" <svg at milathan.ltd>
> *Date:* July 18, 2017 at 6:21:48 AM EDT
> *To:* Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
> *Cc:* "rsp-program-discussion at googlegroups.com" <rsp-program-discussion@
> googlegroups.com>, Graeme Bunton <gbunton at tucows.com>
> *Subject:* *Letter from the RySG's RSP Discussion Group*
>
> Avril, Jeff,
>
>
>
> Please find attached a correspondance from the Registry Service Provider’s
> Discussion Group.
>
>
>
> Graeme, please share this letter with the registrars as you see fit.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Chairman and Managing Director
>
>
>
> *Milathan LTD*
>
> *"Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice"*
>
> ————————
>
> *Discover The Milathan Post on http://post.milathan.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__post.milathan.com_&d=DwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=teD2LgggZO1dfzE4xHX8m5Sv2VyWzu14cZp50llYOt4&s=sRrV8OwUpjtPN9-s9L9knQgiG3fMo4wDVCwHuCZo9Bw&e=>*
>
> *Follow me on Twitter: @stephvg*
>
> ————————
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dnewgtld-2Dwg&d=DwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=teD2LgggZO1dfzE4xHX8m5Sv2VyWzu14cZp50llYOt4&s=HqN1ZtWoo004F3gKskZT6hawL2hjkxREiYEcUMHqUJA&e=>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dnewgtld-2Dwg&d=DwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=CwipU91YB6EkpFXK9ynnT_QUef4yC5p7jpsDm8cU97g&m=teD2LgggZO1dfzE4xHX8m5Sv2VyWzu14cZp50llYOt4&s=HqN1ZtWoo004F3gKskZT6hawL2hjkxREiYEcUMHqUJA&e=>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20170803/1624565c/attachment-0001.html>