[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Mp3, Attendance, AC Recording & AC Chat from New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG call on Tuesday, 07 March 2017

Poncelet Ileleji pileleji at ymca.gm
Wed Mar 8 00:03:42 UTC 2017


Dear Michelle,

Thanks for the updates, apologies for not attending my first today other
engagements took me.

Kind Regards

Poncelet

On 8 March 2017 at 00:46, Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3
> recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call
> held on Tuesday, 07 March 2017 at 20:00 UTC. Attendance of the calls is
> also posted on the agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/Ha-RAw
>
> *MP3: *
> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-08sep16-en.mp3>
> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-07mar17-en.mp3
>
> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO
> Master Calendar page:
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar
> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov>
>
>
>
> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
>
>
>
> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/
>
>
>
> Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/Ha-RAw
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Michelle
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
>
> *Adobe Connect chat transcript for Tuesday**, 07 March 2017*
>  Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
> WG call on Tuesday, 07 March 2017 at 20:00 UTC.
>   Michelle DeSmyter:Meeting page: https://urldefense.
> proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_Ha-
> 2DRAw&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_
> WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=
> GpkcbbtPvo5J88YbJtlLSGRaVH9F4nm4hDlRQcORVdg&s=DvDKTC9jFEUKRMqYQlIhI9Alq_
> TZWbGpREM3IT_HUKE&e=
>   Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:loud and clear.
>   Alexander Schubert:Feels to me like "Groundhog day"......
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3DeZbtAFq7dP8&d=DwIFaQ&c=
> FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_
> WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=
> GpkcbbtPvo5J88YbJtlLSGRaVH9F4nm4hDlRQcORVdg&s=8_lM4V5qcRrUef_HJLt_
> F3ENhFGLeyVEh0lQdyKNtbM&e=
>   Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:loud and clear, avri.
>   Emily Barabas:Please note, we are working with a new Google Document:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1qutP4I6fpyTtH4uSgLqsSFDn7082G
> uexr7gU8YD78Zg_edit-23&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6
> sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_
> 5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=GpkcbbtPvo5J88YbJtlLSGRaVH9F4nm4hDlRQcORVdg&s=
> UamAK7GaGVkTFfsbAF_7eWvHIROpUXGo23xmryO7vow&e=
>   Emily Barabas:If you would like to read along in the Google Doc, please
> use this link
>   Emily Barabas:The document is not synced
>   Emily Barabas:everyone can scroll
>   Emily Barabas:the formatting of the redline in the pod and the google
> doc look a little different, but the content of the edits is the same.
>   jeff neuman:I like periodic...
>   jeff neuman:but that is just me
>   Donna Austin, Neustar:agree with Jeff
>   jeff neuman:Should we say "a RSP" or "an RSP"
>   Sara Bockey:a RSP, I think
>   Donna Austin, Neustar:agree with Sara
>   jeff neuman:I know the general rule is you only use "an" before a word
> that starts with a vowel...but it sounds weird
>   jeff neuman:again that is just me
>   Donna Austin, Neustar:if we spell out RSP it would be 'a registry
> service provider'
>   jeff neuman:true
>   Alexander Schubert:1.1.7 should be periodic in my opinion - as it
> doesn't involve any publishing.
>   Steve Chan:https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> 1qutP4I6fpyTtH4uSgLqsSFDn7082Guexr7gU8YD78Zg/edit#
>   Steve Chan:Apologies if we've gotten the sentiment wrong, but not a lot
> of details in the placeholder.
>   Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:support for 1.5.3. as it is worded.
>   jeff neuman:@Steve - you got it right
>   jeff neuman:have some confidence :)
>   Alexander Schubert:In 1.7.1 we should ask in a way that would allow to
> create this answer:   No "draw" needed when we issue a random number during
> application submission - then use that random number in an algorithm that
> creates a queue! This who wish to be at the end of the quezuecan indicate
> at application submission.
>   jeff neuman:SHould we use "category"
>   Alexander Schubert:Sorry typos:  "Those who wish to be at the end of the
> queue can indicate at application submission."
>   Alexander Schubert:Regarding my previous post!
>   Alexander Schubert:In WT2 I still miss any question about 2.2.1.4.1
> Treatment of Country or Territory Names .....
>   Heather Forrest:Interim report of CWG-UCTN has been published for comment
>   Steve Chan:Further to Heather's comment, it was published on 24 Feb
> here: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_cwg-2Ductn-
> 2Dinterim-2Dpaper-2D2017-2D02-2D24-2Den&d=DwIFaQ&c=
> FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_
> WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=
> GpkcbbtPvo5J88YbJtlLSGRaVH9F4nm4hDlRQcORVdg&s=v9GW6BVdihBWfuiEN_
> 5cKMHuAoLYwhLvIBXSKrASa9o&e=
>   jeff neuman:yes
>   Heather Forrest:To put a finer point on Alexander's comment, the group
> as a whole has not agreed because the scope of the group's work was very
> narrow. Certainly the partifcipants have views that need to be discussed
> here in the PDP.
>   jeff neuman:But we will address that issue when the CWG is done.
>   Donna Austin, Neustar:should there be a note mentioning that country and
> territory names have been left out of this exercise for x reason
>   Alexander Schubert:Footnote that we deal with it later!
>   Steve Chan:Jeff, you deleted it :)
>   Donna Austin, Neustar:yep
>   Justine Chew:Yes
>   Heather Forrest:Excellent question!
>   jeff neuman:I would like to hear from Paul
>   Heather Forrest:Sorry  - slow to post check mark for Option 1. It's
> wordy, but if there are 'yes' answers out there, this group should hear them
>   jeff neuman:Understood.  We can start with a word other than "should"
>   jeff neuman:Structured and/or evaluated?
>   Justine Chew:Yes
>   Steve Chan:Yes, thanks
>   jeff neuman:3.4.6 is new
>   jeff neuman:so let people read
>   jeff neuman:the CCWG on Auction Proceeds is not discussing how auctions
> work or why they exist
>   jeff neuman:it is only talking about the use of funds
>   jeff neuman:@Avri - correct
>   Julie Hedlund:@Avri: That is correct.  Only the funding.
>   Greg Shatan:Actually, they're talking about the mechanisms for deciding
> how to spend the money.
>   Greg Shatan:Others will then decide how to spend the money using those
> mechanisms.
>   jeff neuman:only 1/4 of a billion :)
>   Greg Shatan:You got it....
>   Greg Shatan:Rounding error.
>   Trang Nguyen:4.3.2.3 The AGB criteria did not include evaluation of an
> applicant’s business model. Meaning, Q18 was not evaluated. And the
> projections in Q46 was not evaluated against the proposed business model in
> Q18.
>   jeff neuman:I am fine with that
>   Trang Nguyen:yes
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):if we drop then do ask for the any other
> comments
>   jeff neuman:Is anybody out there?
>   Greg Shatan:Agree with dropping the question.
>   Martin Sutton:Fine to drop q
>   Greg Shatan:4 3 2 6 ask or both.
>   Greg Shatan:Please see chat
>   Greg Shatan:at application time, at contract signing time, or at
> both  times?
>   Greg Shatan:Sounds good
>   Greg Shatan:I have no voice
>   Greg Shatan:and I must scream
>   jeff neuman:You better get it back before friday ;)
>   Steve Chan:There is a similar question in the technical section. If
> there are no objections, I'll make the same change there.
>   Greg Shatan:Just not pluigged in.  Bonus points for literary reference
> in my prior interventions..
>   Trang Nguyen:That timing question probably applies to background
> screening as well.
>   jeff neuman:no objection
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):fine
>   Paul McGrady:"Additional Questions"
>   Julie Hedlund:Could just say "data"?
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):data points refers to any discreet unit of
> information
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):usually in an analytical context
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):it is an Observation
>   Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:"data points" is quite common as a stan ding
> expression, I believe.
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):can be single or multiple measures
>   Alexander Schubert:Noun 1. data point - an item of factual information
> derived from measurement or research
>   Rudy Mendoza:agreed
>   Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:yes, please keep it.
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):can also be seen as a term in multifactorial
> statistical analysis
>   Paul McGrady:Excellent Avri!  Great run through the document.
>   Martin Sutton:well done
>   Sara Bockey:Great job, Avri!
>   Alexander Schubert:I second Kavouss
>   Martin Sutton:well said Kavouss
>   Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:kavouss' motion seconded!
>   Trang Nguyen:Thanks, All! Bye!
>   Donna Austin, Neustar:well done Avri
>   Alexander Schubert:Bye!
>   Sara Bockey:thanks everyone
>   Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):bye
>   Martin Sutton:thx, bye
>   Christopher Niemi:Thank you!
>   Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:thanks, all - bye.
>   Heather Forrest:Safe travels, everyone - thanks Avri and Jeff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>



-- 
Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS
Coordinator
The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio
MDI Road Kanifing South
P. O. Box 421 Banjul
The Gambia, West Africa
Tel: (220) 4370240
Fax:(220) 4390793
Cell:(220) 9912508
Skype: pons_utd






*www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm>http://jokkolabs.net/en/
<http://jokkolabs.net/en/>www.waigf.org
<http://www.waigf.org>www,insistglobal.com <http://www.itag.gm>www.npoc.org
<http://www.npoc.org>http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753
<http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753>*www.diplointernetgovernance.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20170308/b6ee9004/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list