[Gnso-newgtld-wg] [Ext] Re: Meeting schedule was Re: Proposal to Extend CC2 Deadline
Herb Waye
herb.waye at icann.org
Tue May 2 12:40:05 UTC 2017
Dear Avri,
Please take note I acknowledge reception of your email and will respond shortly once I have investigated the issue.
Best regards Herb
Herb Waye
ICANN Ombudsman
https://www.icann.org/ombudsman
https://www.facebook.com/ICANNOmbudsman
Twitter: @IcannOmbudsman
ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior:
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/expected-standards-15sep16-en.pdf
Community Anti-Harassment Policy
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/community-anti-harassment-policy-2017-03-24-en
Confidentiality
All matters brought before the Ombudsman shall be treated as confidential. The Ombudsman shall also take all reasonable steps necessary to preserve the privacy of, and to avoid harm to, those parties not involved in the complaint being investigated by the Ombudsman.The Ombudsman shall only make inquiries about, or advise staff or Board members of the existence and identity of, a complainant in order to further the resolution of the complaint. The Ombudsman shall take all reasonable steps necessary to ensure that if staff and Board members are made aware of the existence and identity of a complainant, they agree to maintain the confidential nature of such information, except as necessary to further the resolution of a complaint
On 5/1/17, 10:47 PM, "avri doria" <avri at apc.org> wrote:
To the New gTTLD subsequent procedure PDP WG
At this point since the notes from Kavouss seem abusive to me, since my
motives have been attacked and since I have been accused of trying to
prevent GAC participation, I have no choice other than to turn this
issue over to the Ombudsman.
The only other alternative I can think of is to accept the fact that I
am incapable of co-chairing this group and step down. I am considering
this but will wait until the ombudsman has a chance to review the issue
and determine my culpability for the things I am being accused of.
Thanks and apologies
avri
On 01-May-17 20:40, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Avri,
> I check the schedule of CCWG Accountability for the month of May and
> found that one Tuesday 16 May , they have Jurisdiction meeting at
> 05,00 UTC thus other Tuesday they do niot have any meeting at that time.
> I therefore request to be collaborative and change the timing of your
> General Meeting to 04,00 UTC and ask CCWG Jurisdiction to shift their
> meeting by Half an hour to start at 05,30 not to have any clash with
> your meeting .As they meet for only 60 minutes still they end by 06,30
> UTC at that only one meeting per night.
> If you insist , I interpret that this is an effort to EXCLUDE GAC TO
> ATTEND THE PDP.
> I will formally announce that to the responsible group.
> You and staff need to kindly work it out in consultation with Bernie.
> I insist on that.
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
> 2017-05-01 20:59 GMT+02:00 avri doria <avri at apc.org
> <mailto:avri at apc.org>>:
>
> Dear Kavouss,
>
> I have received heard your requests and seen your complaint to the
> chairs of the GNSO and the GAC.
>
> Staff reviewed our meeting time and found that 4 UTC was not possible,
> especially for our full meeting as that is a 90 minute meeting that
> would interfere with the WS2 meetings that are scheduled in the 5 UTC
> time frame. We have been very careful to keep our scheduling out
> of the
> WS2 time tracks as that was one of the original concerns that
> people had
> in establishing our rotating scheduling. The other goal we had was
> consistency in the rotating times at which we held meetings as much as
> possible. Finally the point was the sharing of discomfort among the
> residents of various time frames which was accepted by the WG at the
> beginning of this process.
>
> At this point you are the only one with this specific request. Should
> there be a consensus in the group that we need to review and possibly
> redo the rotating schedule of meetings, I will ask the staff to
> help us
> find a new solution that is acceptable to a consensus of the
> participants in the WG. I will ask that the issue be added as AOB to
> our full meeting to find out whether there is consensus on the need to
> reschedule our meetings.
>
> Thank you
>
> Avri
>
>
> On 01-May-17 13:21, Arasteh wrote:
> > Avri
> > Once again, I reiterate-my position which was supported by many
> European residents that the window of 03,00 UTC is a painful
> window for meeting .
> > I sincerely and respectfully request you to move it to 04,00 UTC
> which does not make a big change for Asia Pacific people. Failure
> to do that is a clear sign to exclude People from Europe to attend
> > Regards
> > Kavouss
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On 20 Apr 2017, at 00:18, avri doria <avri at apc.org
> <mailto:avri at apc.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I want to append a comment to this. While I fully support the
> >> extension, I want to encourage people to submit their comments
> as soon
> >> as they can. As most of you know the sub teams are currently
> working on
> >> all these issues and the sooner they get input, the better.
> Everyone in
> >> the leadership group is waiting with bated breath and is eager
> to see
> >> the answers that are ready. Also want to note, that there are many
> >> questions, and there is no barrier to submitting multiple responses
> >> dealing the variety of questions. Also those who submit early
> will have
> >> the opportunity for making further comments should they think
> of new
> >> elements to add to their answers.
> >>
> >> So please, though we are recommending an extension, please feel
> free to
> >> submit the work that is already ready.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> avri
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 18-Apr-17 05:11, Jeff Neuman wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Last week the Avri and I received a formal request from the
> >>> Governmental Advisory Committee to “consider an extension of the
> >>> deadline for public comments to the Community Comment 2 (CC2)
> >>> questionnaire.” In light of the extensive nature of the
> questionnaire
> >>> as well as the desire to get as many responses as possible,
> Avri and I
> >>> are inclined to agree to this request. In order to be fair, we
> >>> believe the extension should be applied to everyone, not just
> the GAC.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Working backwards, it is our desire to have a summary of all
> of the
> >>> public comments to discuss at ICANN59 at the end of June. The
> >>> document deadline for that meeting is 15 business days prior
> to the
> >>> meeting (beginning of June). In order to give staff some time to
> >>> compile the summary in time for the document deadline, we are
> >>> proposing *May 22, 2017* as the new date for comments to be
> due. This
> >>> would be a 3 week extension for the entire community.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I know this is asking for quick turnaround, but please let us
> know by
> >>> no later than *April 20^th *if you have any strong objections
> to this
> >>> proposal. Otherwise, we will let the community know about the
> >>> extension on April 21^st .
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Jeffrey J. Neuman*
> >>>
> >>> *Senior Vice President *|*Valideus USA***| *Com Laude USA*
> >>>
> >>> 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
> >>>
> >>> Mclean, VA 22102, United States
> >>>
> >>> E: _jeff.neuman at valideus.com <mailto:jeff.neuman at valideus.com>
> <mailto:jeff.neuman at valideus.com <mailto:jeff.neuman at valideus.com>>_or
> >>> _jeff.neuman at comlaude.com <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>
> <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com <mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>>_
> >>>
> >>> T: +1.703.635.7514 <tel:%2B1.703.635.7514>
> >>>
> >>> M: +1.202.549.5079 <tel:%2B1.202.549.5079>
> >>>
> >>> @Jintlaw
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> >>> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
> software.
> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_antivirus&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7BPXL6ybT5IAyXYF14owgsniBdDWWWPRshxCBU3anhY&m=4s014xRsgaF6B7s6FAgQKq_Yr1iySkyY-cKhf_V1EUM&s=s-8Iv3CAzomJebossncCHGggicd6tjGJVCCkI8aTmtM&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_antivirus&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7BPXL6ybT5IAyXYF14owgsniBdDWWWPRshxCBU3anhY&m=4s014xRsgaF6B7s6FAgQKq_Yr1iySkyY-cKhf_V1EUM&s=s-8Iv3CAzomJebossncCHGggicd6tjGJVCCkI8aTmtM&e= >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> >> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg>
> >
>
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.avast.com_antivirus&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7BPXL6ybT5IAyXYF14owgsniBdDWWWPRshxCBU3anhY&m=4s014xRsgaF6B7s6FAgQKq_Yr1iySkyY-cKhf_V1EUM&s=s-8Iv3CAzomJebossncCHGggicd6tjGJVCCkI8aTmtM&e=
More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg
mailing list