[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Candidates for the GNSO WT 5 Co-Leader (DISCUSSION PERIOD)

Thu Oct 5 23:50:33 UTC 2017

Agreed.  Discussion of potential co-chairs should be purely procedural, and
should not involve discussion of substantive WG issues.  I imagine the WG
Guidelines might have some guidance on that point, which Staff might please
point out?

Thanks,
Mike

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Rob Hall <rob at momentous.com> wrote:

> Perhaps I am being naïve, but is the answer not contained in your question
> ?
>
>
>
> The job of a co-chair is to facilitate discussion.
>
>
>
> The group decides what is worth more time or not.  The Chairs job is to
> facilitate the will of the group.
>
>
>
> A chair is not a CEO.   They do not lead.  They facilitate.  They keep the
> group on point and moving forward productively.
>
>
>
> I am not sure we should be choosing a chair based on their opinions of
> specific issues.   To me, it is far more important they understand the role
> of chair as opposed to what their opinion on any one issue is.
>
>
>
> Rob.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Aikman-Scalese,
> Anne" <AAikman at lrrc.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 7:07 PM
> *To: *"Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrc.com>, 'Jeff Neuman' <
> jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>, "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <
> gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Candidates for the GNSO WT 5 Co-Leader
> (DISCUSSION PERIOD)
>
>
>
> Or more appropriately phrased, How would you as Co-Chair, facilitate
> discussion on the matters in 1 – 4 below and are some worth more time than
> others in the discussion?
>
>
>
> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
>
> Of Counsel
>
> 520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
>
> 520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
>
> AAikman at lrrc.com
>
> _____________________________
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>
> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
> lrrc.com
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-
> bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 05, 2017 4:03 PM
> *To:* 'Jeff Neuman'; gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Candidates for the GNSO WT 5 Co-Leader
> (DISCUSSION PERIOD)
>
>
>
> QUESTION FOR ALL THE CANDIDATES  (SINCE I’M SURE THEY HAVE ALL THOUGHT
> ABOUT THIS):
>
>
>
> How do you propose to balance the interests of governments with those of
> other applicants for names that do not constitute city or country names,
> but have some “geographic identity”?  (Please consider regions, rivers,
> etc.)
>
>
>
> Would you
>
>    1. Give priority to government-based applications in the event there
>    are competing applications for the same name?
>
>
>
>
>
>    1. Establish a Government Objection process whereby competing
>    interests could be weighed?  If so, what criteria would be measured by the
>    Panel that could result in a successful Government Objection Process?
>
>
>
>
>
>    1. Require government approval for all applications having “geographic
>    identity” even if not a city or country name?
>
>
>
>
>
>    1. Give priority to brand applications if the brand (that is not a
>    city or country) has long-standing trademark recognition and value
>    independent of its “geographic identity”?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
>
> Of Counsel
>
> 520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
>
> 520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
>
> AAikman at lrrc.com
>
> _____________________________
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>
> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>
> lrrc.com
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-
> bounces at icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Jeff
> Neuman
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 01, 2017 8:09 AM
> *To:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Candidates for the GNSO WT 5 Co-Leader
> (DISCUSSION PERIOD)
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> As discussed on our last call, Avri, Cheryl and I have asked each of the
> candidates for the GNSO Co-Leader position on Work Track 5 (GNSO Co-Leader)
> if they would object to public disclosure of their names and expressions of
> interest for the position.  I am happy to report that each of the
> candidates have agreed.  In addition, we received one additional candidate
> since our last meeting.  Nominations for candidates are now closed.
>
>
>
> The four candidates for the GNSO Co-Leader position are (in alphabetical
> order):
>
>
>
>    1. Ching Chiao
>    2. Carlos Raul Gutierrez
>    3. Greg Shatan
>    4. Martin Sutton
>
>
>
> I have attached each of their expressions of interest.  By the publication
> of these names, the leadership of the SubPro PDP Working Group is kicking
> off a discussion period on the candidates.  Keeping in mind ICANN’s
> standards of expected behavior, questions and comments about the candidates
> may now be posted.    If you have a question for one or more particular
> candidates, please make sure that you include the words “QUESTION FOR
> _________” in the subject or QUESTION FOR ALL CANDIDATES.  This is not
> required, but will help us keep track of all the questions so that we can
> make sure that they are answered.
>
>
>
> Finally, ass discussed, it is our intention as a leadership team (The
> Co-Leaders of the full working group along with the WT 1-4 co-leaders) to
> discuss our recommendation on our next call scheduled for Monday, October 9
> th based on the discussions, comments and questions on this list.
>
>
>
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> *Jeffrey J. Neuman*
>
> *Senior Vice President *|*Valideus USA* | *Com Laude USA*
>
> 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600
>
> Mclean, VA 22102, United States
>
> E: jeff.neuman at valideus.com or jeff.neuman at comlaude.com
>
> T: +1.703.635.7514 <(703)%20635-7514>
>
> M: +1.202.549.5079 <(202)%20549-5079>
>
> @Jintlaw
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20171005/5ec1ef51/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20171005/5ec1ef51/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6501 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20171005/5ec1ef51/image002-0001.png>