[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Fwd: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG: Request for Input

Fri Feb 2 18:19:40 UTC 2018

My view is : we will have personal TLds like we have emails now, or the tendency is to reduce progressively TLDs importance.

Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrc.com>
Date: Friday, February 2, 2018 at 16:15
To: 'Jeff Neuman' <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>, "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Fwd: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG: Request for Input

I think the following point made by the RSSAC is very significant and certainly deserves further discussion.

·         Using concepts from the disciplines of library and cognitive science, what number of TLDs results in their loss of memorability and significance?

Hard to balance this with freedom of expression goal, but it should be given more consideration.  In addition, the marketplace trend is toward apps – not more websites.

Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman at lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>

_____________________________

[cid:image001.png at 01D39C41.9F8E5970]

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/>

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2018 7:05 AM
To: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org; gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Fwd: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG: Request for Input

Just in from the RSSAC.  We will add the questions asked of us to the appropriate Work Tracks.  Although some of the, may naturally fit in Work Track 4, others may be overall questions to the Working Group.

If you have any thoughts on responses, please do not hesitate to weigh in and we will start keeping track on a Google Doc.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Senior Vice President
Com Laude USA / Valideus USA
1751 Pinnacle Dr., Suite 600
McLean, VA 22102
Jeff.Neuman at comlaude.com<mailto:Jeff.Neuman at comlaude.com>
+1 (202) 549-5079

Begin forwarded message:
From: Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org<mailto:steve.sheng at icann.org>>
Date: February 2, 2018 at 8:49:36 AM EST
To: Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>>, avri doria <avri at apc.org<mailto:avri at apc.org>>
Cc: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br<mailto:rubensk at nic.br>>, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr at gmail.com<mailto:langdonorr at gmail.com>>, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>, Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org<mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund at icann.org>>, "rssac at icann.org<mailto:rssac at icann.org>" <rssac at icann.org<mailto:rssac at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG: Request for Input
Dear Jeff and Avri,

Per your request on 14 September 2017, attached please find RSSAC’s response on root scaling.

In addition to its formal advice, the RSSAC raises the following questions for the wider community (including GNSO) to consider. These questions go beyond the specifics of operations of DNS, the IANA functions, and the root server system, to broader issues of the costs and benefits of aggressive expansion of the root zone:

·         Independent of expanding the commercial buoyancy of the DNS industry, how does the addition of many thousands of new gTLDs to the root zone make the Internet better for the people who use it, aside from the addition of IDNs for language and culture?

·         Using concepts from the disciplines of library and cognitive science, what number of TLDs results in their loss of memorability and significance?

·         Is adding a significantly large number of TLDs (e.g., more than 100,000) to the root zone, and presumably augmenting the business interests in the addressing system, a sustainable model for the DNS? At what point might this model fail. What next steps for naming system innovation are required, and when?

Best Regards
Steve Sheng on behalf of

Tripti Sinha and Brad Verd
Co-Chairs, Root Server System Advisory Committee

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20180202/768619c9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6502 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20180202/768619c9/image001-0001.png>