[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Notes and Action Items - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 14 June 2018

[Rubens Kuhl]

> On 16 Jun 2018, at 16:48, lists at christopherwilkinson.eu Wilkinson <lists at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:
> 
> Dear Ken Stubbs:
> 
> Thankyou. I think you and Anne are correct, if for other reasons.
> 
> 1.  there are several aspects of the draft report which  - taken literally - would seriously prejudice the outcome of the WT5 work on Geographical Names.  I would not support taking those matters off the WT5 agenda simply because other WTs have been closed down, prematurely, by 'finalising' their draft reports.
> 

As pointed out by many during the call, this is simply not true. WT5 has full discretion to determine whether something particular to Geo Names needs different handling.

> 
> 2.  WT5 started late (¿Why?). So be it, but then the PDP has to mark time while the Geo-Names issues are resolved, including aspects that are being treated, to date, by other WTs.
> 

Also not true, since there is much more to discuss than Geo-Names specifically.
> 
> 3.  From my point of view I could not support going out for 'public comment' on the basis of a partial draft that does not reflect a consensus of the Work Tracks.
> 

This was already answered a number of times by co-chairs.



Rubens

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20180617/6975dd47/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20180617/6975dd47/signature.asc>