[Gnso-newgtld-wg] New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Initial Report

[Greg Shatan]

WT4 is not a drafting subgroup, it is a deliberative subgroup.  If it were
a drafting subgroup, it would be drafting a report based on the
deliberations of the WG as a whole.

Greg

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:10 AM Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> wrote:

>
> On 20 Jun 2018, at 21:03, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com> wrote:
>
> There was no consensus. There was no consensus call.  There were no
> “findings” and there is nothing getting “derailed”, but that is an
> interesting choice of words on your part.
>
>
> Actually, WT4 initially did a good number of consensus calls on
> foundational questions. Outcomes mostly didn't have formal consensus calls,
> although a minority from the beginning happened to have.
> But in order to have an homogenous output of the WG, we won't be
> referencing even the ones that were done as such.
>
>
>
> From the GNSO Working Group Guidelines:  “It is the responsibility of the
> WG members to make sure any initial drafts represent as much of the
> diversity of views as possible.”
>
>
>
> Let me continue quoting the phrase just after the one you quoted:
> "This may be done by either asking multiple WG members to contribute text
> that may be assembled with the help of staff, or for a drafting subgroup to
> be established to produce such an initial draft. "
>
> A drafting subgroup is exactly what WT4 is, so the method prescribed by
> the GNSO WG guidelines was followed.
>
> Jeff advised these issues will be addressed. I’ll check the redline.
>
>
> Please refer redline issues to staff and co-chairs.
>
>
> Rubens
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20180623/425c32d8/attachment.html>