[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 8 October 2018 at 15:00 UTC

[Justine Chew]

I don't disagree with Jim.

In fact, spending a bit more time to flesh out Sarah's "draw" mechanism
could prove useful, and as may getting feedback from ICANN Legal on whether
there might be impediments to prohibiting non-ICANN private auctions.

Justine Chew
-----


On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 at 19:34, Jim Prendergast <jim at galwaysg.com> wrote:

> Cheryl and Jeff
>
>
>
> I understand from the last call that it’s your intent to wrap up
> discussion on the supplemental interim report on Monday’s call and finalize
> the report soon thereafter.  While that timeline made sense a week ago, I’m
> not so sure it does now.
>
>
>
> In the last week, there have been three developments that I think warrant
> further deliberation:
>
>
>
> 1) There has been renewed discussion around contention resolution via
> auctions (private or ICANN).  And it continues.  It’s brought more voices
> (new and dormant) into the debate and as a result we have more issues that
> are being worked into the document.  This is a good thing as we want to
> present as many options to the community as possible.  The document is
> better because of that.
>
> 2) The comment period on the initial report closed and while I haven’t
> been through all of them yet, I have seen a few instances where the issue
> of auctions was raised.  For example:
>
>    - Some members of the RYSG and the ALAC said the legality of private
>    auctions should be discussed.
>    - The ICANN Board said that they had concerns around private auctions
>    and how they can be reconciled with ICANN’s commitments and core values.  I
>    think we need to get more clarity from the Board on that.
>    - The IPC asked for a study on abuse of private auctions to take place
>    before it could make a full determination
>
> 3) Related to the last bullet point, as part of our deliberations, there
> was supposed to be outreach to auction providers to determine if there were
> additional instances of irregularities.  We haven’t had an update on that
> recently, but the results of that outreach need to be in this report
> otherwise it is incomplete.
>
>
>
> We as a group would be remiss if we proceeded to another public comment
> period without looking at those comments and try to determine how they
> should be reflected in this document before us.  As many of us know, a lot
> of time, energy and effort was put into those and for this group to not
> even consider them in this document would send a terrible message.
>
>
>
> As you said when asking for liaisons, comments from SGs and ACs hold more
> weight than individual comments so we should give them such deference.
>
>
>
> I understand this might lead to delaying releasing the interim till after
> Barcelona, but the reality is no one outside this group will be looking at
> it leading into and during the meeting.  There is too much other material
> to digest prepping for and during the meeting.
>
>
>
> Curious to hear what others think.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of
> *Steve Chan
> *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2018 5:42 PM
> *To:* gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent
> Procedures PDP WG - 8 October 2018 at 15:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Dear WG Members,
>
>
>
> Please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP
> WG meeting scheduled for 8 October 2018 at 15:00 UTC, for 90 minutes.
>
>
>
>    1. Agenda review/SOIs
>    2. Supplemental Report: Review of sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5
>    continued
>    3. Planning for ICANN63
>    4. AOB
>
>
>
> For agenda item 2, please find the latest draft, which accepted all
> red-lined edits made prior to the 2 October meeting (you can find that
> draft here: https://community.icann.org/x/4QirBQ). As it was anticipated
> that changes would be non-trivial, it was believed that accepting red-lines
> prior to making new proposed edits would improve the readability of this
> latest draft.
>
>
>
> For Item 3, we will further discuss plans for the sessions scheduled for
> day 1 of ICANN63, Saturday 20 October (see the published schedule here:
> https://63.schedule.icann.org/meetings).
>
>
>
> Those signed up as Members to this PDP WG should have received meeting
> information from the SOAC Support team. If you did not receive these
> participation details or if you would like to send your apologies, please
> contact the SOAC Support team (gnso-secs at icann.org).
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Steve 2
>
>
>
>
>
> *Steven Chan*
>
> Policy Director, GNSO Support
>
>
>
> *ICANN*
>
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
>
> Mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>
> Offic
>
>
> e Telephone: +1.310.301.5800
>
> Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649
>
>
>
> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
> <https://learn.icann.org/> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
> <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>
> .
>
>
>
> Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO
>
> Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20181007/172136a8/attachment.html>