[Gnso-newgtld-wg] CURRENCY CODES: WAS RE: Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 12 August 2019 at 15:00 UTC

[lists at christopherwilkinson.eu]

Jeff:  I agree with Anne. When shall the PDP start discussing the CCT-RT Recommendations?

CW

> On 19 Aug 2019, at 19:19, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>> wrote:
> 
> P.S. The ICANN Board scorecard where you can find the specific referral of CCT-RT Recommendations to Sub Pro is here:
>  
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/resolutions-final-cct-recs-scorecard-01mar19-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/resolutions-final-cct-recs-scorecard-01mar19-en.pdf>  
>  
> Anne
>  
> From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne 
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 9:30 AM
> To: 'Greg Shatan' <gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>; lists at christopherwilkinson.eu <mailto:lists at christopherwilkinson.eu>
> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] CURRENCY CODES: WAS RE: Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 12 August 2019 at 15:00 UTC
>  
> I believe that the Consumer Trust and Confidence Review Team report referred issues to Sub Pro related to a need to define “DNS abuse”.  The question of whether top level domains as currency codes is appropriate or not depends on the potential for abuse.  It’s highly likely that a top level currency code string would be the subject of GAC Advice regarding a need for “safeguards”.  Eligibility would also be an issue since currency exchange is a regulated banking activity. 
>  
> Letting “the chips fall where they may” as to Currency Codes as Top Level Domains is not the correct policy-making approach when it comes to understanding the recommendations of CCT-RT that have been referred to Sub Pro.  The specific recommendations sent to Sub Pro by the Board include Nos. 12, 25, 29, 32, 33, 34, and 35.  In addition, in the “pending” category (including the need to develop a definition of “abuse”) are items 15, 19, and 23 on the ICANN Board scorecard referring issues to Sub Pro.
>  
> Thank you,
> Anne
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20190820/173cd3b5/attachment.html>