[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Resolving Objection Proceedings with Mandatory PICs

Rubens Kuhl rubensk at nic.br
Fri Sep 27 21:24:38 UTC 2019



> Em 27 de set de 2019, à(s) 16:57:000, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com> escreveu:
> 
> Thanks Jeff. I think it’s going to be important to call for the Minority Statements when Leadership determines what high level agreement exists in cases where we do not have full consensus.
> 
> However, something else very important to this process that you have not mentioned below is the fact that there are certain issues that will call for additional public comment.  Hopefully we can discuss in Montreal which issues these are and get a WG consensus on further public comment that is needed.

Anne,

An additional public comment is not a given yet. It might happen, it might not happen, AFAIK.



Rubens


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20190927/4716d3ad/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 528 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20190927/4716d3ad/signature-0001.asc>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list