[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Community Applications - Independent Research by panelist standards

Tue Apr 21 17:12:08 UTC 2020

Hi Anne,

In response to your question below to Jeff, the WG has a working document to collect feedback on the 2012 CPE Guidelines. It includes input received about the Guidelines over the mailing list inserted as comments. You can find the document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ih_1NARViJXNNewDg-q87sQzQoC1dCtC/edit. I don’t believe that the Working Group has actually taken the step of agreeing on revisions to the 2012 Guidelines or scoring  criteria, but that could potentially be a next step for the Working Group to take on.

Kind regards,
Emily

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrc.com>
Date: Tuesday, 21 April 2020 at 16:34
To: "gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>, "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady at taftlaw.com>
Cc: "Cheryl Langdon-Orr (cheryl at hovtek.com.au)" <cheryl at hovtek.com.au>, "Jamie Baxter (jamie at dotgay.com)" <jamie at dotgay.com>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Community Applications - Independent Research by panelist standards

[cid:image001.gif at 01D61810.BFB4F860]
Paul,
You wanted to start a small group on this topic, but we have not heard from you as to a counter-proposal.  Jamie and Kathy are copied.
Thank you,
Anne

From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 7:52 AM
To: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
Cc: 'Jeff Neuman' <jeff.neuman at comlaude.com>; Cheryl Langdon-Orr (cheryl at hovtek.com.au) <cheryl at hovtek.com.au>; McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady at taftlaw.com>; 'Kathy Kleiman' <kathy at kathykleiman.com>; Jamie Baxter (jamie at dotgay.com) <jamie at dotgay.com>
Subject: Community Applications - Independent Research by panelist standards

Dear WG,
In light of the short time frame, I am proposing language re the standard for Community Evaluation panelist relying on independent research (proposed limitation from 2012 by Kristine Dorrain and Paul McGrady) as follows:

“deemed necessary to verify the community status of the applicant, provided, however, that the evaluator shall disclose such independent research to the applicant and the applicant shall be provided 30 days to respond to such research before the evaluation decision is rendered.”

Just trying to get the ball rolling on this proposed compromise – noting that a lack of consensus results in a fallback to 2012 implementation.

In addition, I think I have missed the proposed revisions to the Community Guidelines for scoring.  Jeff, was this sent around again?

Thank you,
Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman at lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>

_____________________________

[cid:image002.png at 01D61810.BFB4F860]

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com [lrrc.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lrrc.com_&d=DwMF-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=CjwtjnkDFBmff2L470culhJlnUSu2KYqAyYWus-V1GE&s=e9bpveYjzH0dxmK0QXgdfDQ3ZEYSj0MqbQD_dS3PnlA&e=>

[cid:image003.jpg at 01D61810.BFB4F860]

Because what matters

to you, matters to us.™

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200421/93260664/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 71 bytes
Desc: image001.gif
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200421/93260664/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6524 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200421/93260664/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2462 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200421/93260664/image003-0001.jpg>