[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed text on Application Comment
vanda at scartezini.org
Wed Feb 26 15:50:46 UTC 2020
Better alternative Rubens.
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
On 2/25/20, 00:55, "Gnso-newgtld-wg on behalf of Rubens Kuhl" <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of rubensk at nic.br> wrote:
"As was the case in the 2012 round, applicants should continue to be given the opportunity through Clarifying Questions to respond to comments that might impact scoring."
"As was the case in the 2012 round, when an application comment would make an evaluator reduces scoring, applicants must have the opportunity through Clarifying Questions to respond."
Rewording just changes it to "should"; when rewriting, the use of must occurred to me as a better option, but it's a bit of a substantive change.
More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg