[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Client Alert - Supreme Court Finds BOOKING.COM Non-Generic And Capable Of Federal Trademark Registration

trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
Wed Jul 1 05:15:38 UTC 2020


Well said Paul. +1

Marc H. Trachtenberg
Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | 77 West Wacker Drive | Suite 3100 | Chicago, IL 60601
Tel 312.456.1020
Mobile 773.677.3305
trac at gtlaw.com<mailto:trac at gtlaw.com> | http://www.gtlaw.com<http://www.gtlaw.com/>

[Greenberg Traurig]

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of McGrady, Paul D.
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 9:50 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com>; gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Client Alert - Supreme Court Finds https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://BOOKING.COM__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!XJoeW5Z9Z4i9YQpJQ9_31L-43NpGfDKwnQPnKtTmKeEISrPmObwBh71PVchFSYC-8z7uNA$  Non-Generic And Capable Of Federal Trademark Registration

*EXTERNAL TO GT*
Thanks Anne.

All, here is the link to the actual decision:  https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.law360.com/dockets/download/5efb47347da17405e86713cb?doc_url=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.supremecourt.gov*2Fopinions*2F19pdf*2F19-46_8n59.pdf&label=Opinion__;JSUlJSUl!!DUT_TFPxUQ!XJoeW5Z9Z4i9YQpJQ9_31L-43NpGfDKwnQPnKtTmKeEISrPmObwBh71PVchFSYAw6ludIw$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.law360.com/dockets/download/5efb47347da17405e86713cb?doc_url=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.supremecourt.gov*2Fopinions*2F19pdf*2F19-46_8n59.pdf&label=Opinion__;JSUlJSUl!!DUT_TFPxUQ!W-N0c06Vo7L4eh-Tm5pSfcrMY9OhwaRzs4eLJ5fK_CbAVDBYAh9ThfIBJlmFB6saC4k$>.  The Supreme Court strikes down the USPTO’s per se rule against allowing trademark registration for generic term + trademark.  Justice Ginsburg does a great job of pointing out why people who are worried about a competitor no longer being able to use the generic word (e.g. claims that there would be a monopoly on such a term) have nothing to fear.  It’s a great read.  I wish we could get her on one of our calls!

The same is, of course, true in ICANNland – a so-called closed generic for .hammers would not stop anyone from using “hammers” to identify hammers.  And, just like the for the USPTO, a per se rule against them makes no sense.  This is, no doubt, why the ICANN Board deferred the 2012 closed generic applications to the upcoming round and asked us to develop policy to deal with those deferred applications.  I remain hopeful, against all nay saying to the contrary, that we can still eek out some policy here as the Board asked us to do.

Best to all,
Paul





To receive regular COVID-19 updates from Taft, subscribe here<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.taftlaw.com/general/subscribe__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!W-N0c06Vo7L4eh-Tm5pSfcrMY9OhwaRzs4eLJ5fK_CbAVDBYAh9ThfIBJlmFkkhi-1I$>. For additional resources, visit Taft's COVID-19 Resource Toolkit<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.taftlaw.com/general/coronavirus-covid-19-resource-toolkit__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!W-N0c06Vo7L4eh-Tm5pSfcrMY9OhwaRzs4eLJ5fK_CbAVDBYAh9ThfIBJlmFQCmW57w$>.

This message may contain information that is attorney-client privileged, attorney work product or otherwise confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, use and disclosure of this message are prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org>> On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2020 7:12 PM
To: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: Client Alert - Supreme Court Finds https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://BOOKING.COM__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!XJoeW5Z9Z4i9YQpJQ9_31L-43NpGfDKwnQPnKtTmKeEISrPmObwBh71PVchFSYC-8z7uNA$  Non-Generic And Capable Of Federal Trademark Registration

Dear WG members,
Just in case anyone on the list is wondering about the US Supreme Court decision in the https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://booking.com__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!XJoeW5Z9Z4i9YQpJQ9_31L-43NpGfDKwnQPnKtTmKeEISrPmObwBh71PVchFSYDRwmLF7w$  trademark case that Paul and I were discussing on the list, please see attached summary.  Again, my view is this is a “secondary meaning” case with uncontested evidence that consumers recognized the domain as a source indicator of the owner’s services.

Thank you,
Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office


AAikman at lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman at lrrc.com>

_____________________________

[cid:image003.png at 01D64F3C.BD9B9350]

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lrrc.com__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!XJoeW5Z9Z4i9YQpJQ9_31L-43NpGfDKwnQPnKtTmKeEISrPmObwBh71PVchFSYCHkeouBQ$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/lrrc.com/__;!!DUT_TFPxUQ!W-N0c06Vo7L4eh-Tm5pSfcrMY9OhwaRzs4eLJ5fK_CbAVDBYAh9ThfIBJlmFmdWFPHg$>






________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster at gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200701/c4f45a44/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6399 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200701/c4f45a44/image002-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6522 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200701/c4f45a44/image003-0001.png>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list