[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Compromise proposal on Auctions

[Rubens Kuhl]

> On 1 Jul 2020, at 17:26, Jim Prendergast <jim at GALWAYSG.COM> wrote:
> 
> In the interest of compromise and in hopes of not reverting to the 2012 rules and thereby ignoring the Board’s request that we make a recommendation on this issue, please consider this proposal to allow contention resolution via creative means as well as auctions, with guardrails and tweaks made to the well-received hybrid proposal.
> 
> It is a blend of many of the compromise solutions proposed. It also accommodates those who do not want ICANN to end up with all auction proceeds but at the same time minimizes the entire pool of money committed, thereby not disadvantaging single applicants.
> 
> Objective:
> Increase transparency and accountability in contention resolution to improve the perception of ICANN and the new gTLD program.
> 
> Proposed process:
> String Similarity evaluation completed

Jim,

You might want to add security and stability evaluation (which is string-based, not Q30 Security question in Technical Evaluation) and name collision risk.


Rubens

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200701/f2c42e5a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200701/f2c42e5a/signature.asc>