[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Reminder: Deadline Wed 15 July - "Can't Live With" Review of Package 7 and Final Check on Revised Package 6

Justine Chew justine.chew at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 00:29:43 UTC 2020


Jeff, Cheryl,

I would like to seek clarification on one paragraph under part c. of
Objections

c. New issues raised in deliberations since publication of the Initial
Report, if applicable.

The Working Group discussed a proposal that there should be grounds for a
formal objection if an applied-for string is an exact translation of an
existing TLD string that is in a highly regulated sector, and the
applied-for string would not employ the same safeguards as the existing
TLD, subject to the applicant’s governing law. This proposal would
potentially require creating a new type of objection. The rationale for
this proposal is that end-users may be confused and assume that both
strings have the same safeguards in place. A concern was raised that this
proposal could potentially harm competition and discourage the use of
innovative business models. *The Working Group determined that because the
Working Group agreed upon Category 1 restrictions for regulated strings,
there is no need for the objection process*.


My question is what happens if there is an application for a string which
is an exact translation of an existing TLD string that is in a highly
regulated sector, i.e. one marked for Category 1 restrictions for regulated
strings - how is such an applied-for string dealt with?

Thanks,
Justine
---


On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:47, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> As a reminder, the deadline for Can’t Live With comments on package 7 and
> a final check on package 6 is *Wednesday 15 July at 23:59 UTC*. Details
> below.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
>
>
> *From: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
> *Date: *Friday, 10 July 2020 at 19:44
> *To: *"gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Deadline Wed 15 July - "Can't Live With" Review of Package 7
> and Final Check on Revised Package 6
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> The following are now available for your review in the production document
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hh8Wj3IwXvi91Am1k4Zoooct2zmPOmVe1pLmjQLuQuo/edit?usp=sharing%20%5bdocs.google.com%5d>.
> The *deadline *for comments is* Wednesday 15 July at 23:59 UTC*.
>
>    1. *Package 7* sections of the Report are now ready for *“Can’t Live
>    With”* review (beginning on page 148
>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hh8Wj3IwXvi91Am1k4Zoooct2zmPOmVe1pLmjQLuQuo/edit>
>    )*:*
>
> ·         Please limit comments to items in the revised sections that you
> absolutely “cannot live with.” If there is text that you cannot accept,
> please fill out the attached form and send it to the WG by email. Please do
> not provide your input in any other format.
>
> ·         Package 7 includes two report sections:
>
> ·         *2.5.4 Applicant Support* (last discussed on 11 June
> <https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2020-06-11+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP>)
> - For this section, *please limit “Can’t Live With” comments to the new
> text in the section*, which is displayed in black. The text in grey has
> already gone through “Can’t Live With” review as part of an earlier
> package.
>
> ·         *2.3.2 Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs) / Public Interest
> Commitments (PICs)* (last discussed on 18 June
> <https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2020-06-18+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Procedures+PDP>
> )
>
> ·         Comments will be tracked here
> <https://community.icann.org/x/JDKJBw>.
>
>
>
>    1. *Package 6* revisions of the report, now ready for a *final check*
>    (beginning on page 118
>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hh8Wj3IwXvi91Am1k4Zoooct2zmPOmVe1pLmjQLuQuo/edit>):
>
>
> ·         Please limit feedback to errors in the edits, for example a
> revision that you believe does not accurately reflect the outcome of
> discussions about a “Can’t Live With” item.
>
> ·         Please send this type of feedback to the mailing list. Typo
> corrections can be sent directly to staff.
>
> ·         For package 6 sections, *please do not raise new issues,
> introduce new “Can’t Live With” items, or re-open deliberations**.*
>
> ·         A high-level summary of the “Can’t Live With” input received is
> available here
> <https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/g.+Draft+Final+Report>. And a
> detailed log with the outcomes from the WG’s consideration of that input
> is available here
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1blgQjzh_vR7WQ1utsqBnHDb8_b2DD7IDQu-bcJVsmTQ/edit?usp=sharing>
> .
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
>
>
>
>
> Emily Barabas
>
> Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
>
> www.icann.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20200715/e90de73c/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list