[Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: ICANN Org SubPro comments

Alexander Schubert alexander at schubert.berlin
Thu Oct 1 13:59:51 UTC 2020



Jeff, read your comment only now. Understood.








From: Jeff Neuman [mailto:jeff at jjnsolutions.com] 
Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2020 16:40
To: Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba at gmail.com>; Alexander Schubert <alexander at schubert.berlin>
Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: ICANN Org SubPro comments




I appreciate the fact that you are reading some of the comments that have come in and encourage all of you to do so.  That said, I ask that you hold off a little bit before posting questions or comments on those comments until such time that we have all had an opportunity to read and digest the comments, understand their context and schedule the applicable discussions.  


I cant and don’t want to stop any good discussions, but giving some time for ICANN Org to produce its report and for us to review will help us make sure that we are able to capture all of these discussions as we finalize the Final Report.







Jeffrey J. Neuman

Founder & CEO

JJN Solutions, LLC

p: +1.202.549.5079

E:  <mailto:jeff at jjnsolutions.com> jeff at jjnsolutions.com




From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> > On Behalf Of Maxim Alzoba
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 9:34 AM
To: Alexander Schubert <alexander at schubert.berlin <mailto:alexander at schubert.berlin> >
Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: ICANN Org SubPro comments


I hope it does not mean - special prices for unwanted customers, but it might be read so.

 (personally, I do not understand what proactive pricing fees mean in real life other than what I wrote).



Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,


Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow)


On 1 Oct 2020, at 15:57, Alexander Schubert <alexander at schubert.berlin <mailto:alexander at schubert.berlin> > wrote:


Hi All,


Could anybody translate this one for me:

The PDP WG notes that “the purpose of an application fee floor is to deter speculation

and potential warehousing of TLDs, as well as mitigate against the use of TLDs for

abusive or malicious purposes.” ICANN org seeks input on whether this provision could

be harmonized with the "bona fide" applicant provision from the Auction section, as the

fee schedule could be proactive as opposed to a reactive means of deterring speculative



Does this say we should put a focus on a sufficiently high application fee floor – or does it mean that the fee floor is irrelevant as other means would deter speculative applications?









From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [ <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org> mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Karen Lentz
Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2020 03:21
To:  <mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org> gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: ICANN Org SubPro comments


Dear all,


Forwarding for your information the input from ICANN org to the draft Final Report.  We have also submitted this for addition into the comment tool being used for this comment forum.


Best regards,




From: Theresa Swinehart < <mailto:theresa.swinehart at icann.org> theresa.swinehart at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 5:10 PM
To: " <mailto:jeff at jjnsolutions.com> jeff at jjnsolutions.com" < <mailto:jeff at jjnsolutions.com> jeff at jjnsolutions.com>, " <mailto:langdonorr at gmail.com> langdonorr at gmail.com" < <mailto:langdonorr at gmail.com> langdonorr at gmail.com>
Cc: Goran Marby < <mailto:goran.marby at icann.org> goran.marby at icann.org>, Karen Lentz < <mailto:karen.lentz at icann.org> karen.lentz at icann.org>, David Olive < <mailto:david.olive at icann.org> david.olive at icann.org>, Steve Chan < <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org> steve.chan at icann.org>
Subject: ICANN Org SubPro comments


Dear Cheryl and Jeff, 


Please find the attached letter and submission from ICANN org regarding the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Working Group Draft final report.


I hope you and your families are well. 


Kind regards, 





Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
 <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
 <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy> https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos> https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20201001/b8b79ad0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12601 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20201001/b8b79ad0/image002-0001.png>

More information about the Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list