[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] @EXT RE: Continuing the discussion on hardbounces, and deciding on terminology

Fri Dec 5 17:38:45 UTC 2014

INdeed.
SP
On 2014-12-05, 9:22, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
> Luc, we are not talking here about the e-mail address published in Whois, but the one to which the p/p provider forwards the message that was sent to the e-mail address published in Whois.
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luc SEUFER [mailto:lseufer at dclgroup.eu]
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 9:14 AM
> To: Leaning, Richard
> Cc: Metalitz, Steven; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: @EXT RE: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Continuing the discussion on hardbounces, and deciding on terminology
>
> Hello Richard
>
> Yes, the registrant is ultimately responsible for maintaining its details current. But in case they fail to - whatever the reason - a complaint can be lodged to ICANN via this form https://forms.icann.org/en/resources/compliance/complaints/whois/inaccuracy-form and the registrars in charge of the domain name will have to take reasonable steps to investigate and if applicable correct the inaccurate data.
>
> The fact that the registrant details are those of the PP provider doesn’t matter. The obligations of the registrars stemming from the RAA are the same.
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Luc
>
>
> // Luc Seufer
> Chief Legal Officer | EuroDNS
>
> office: +352 26 37 25-166
> mobile: +352 691 600 417
> fax: +352 20 300 166
> lseufer at eurodns.com<mailto:lseufer at eurodns.com> | www.eurodns.com<http://www.eurodns.com>
>
> 2, rue Léon Laval
> L-3372 Leudelange
> Luxembourg
>
> On 05 Dec 2014, at 11:01, Leaning, Richard <Richard.Leaning at europol.europa.eu<mailto:Richard.Leaning at europol.europa.eu>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Richard Leaning
> Cyber Community Engagement
> European Cyber Crime Centre (EC3)
> Europol
>
> Mobile +44 (0) 7814744079
> Office +31 70 3531630
> Richard.leaning at europol.europa.eu<mailto:Richard.leaning at europol.europa.eu>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leaning, Richard
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 11:00 AM W. Europe Standard Time
> To: 'Luc SEUFER'; 'Steven J. Metalitz'
> Cc: 'gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>'
> Subject: RE: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Continuing the discussion on hard bounces, and deciding on terminology
>
> My understanding is that it's the registrant who is responsible to keep the WHOIS accurate, not the registrar. Which is the problem with the WHOIS. I know that's another conversation altogether.
>
> Cheers
>
> Dick
>
>
>
> Richard Leaning
> Cyber Community Engagement
> European Cyber Crime Centre (EC3)
> Europol
>
> Mobile +44 (0) 7814744079
> Office +31 70 3531630
> Richard.leaning at europol.europa.eu<mailto:Richard.leaning at europol.europa.eu>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luc SEUFER [lseufer at dclgroup.eu<mailto:lseufer at dclgroup.eu>]
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 10:15 AM W. Europe Standard Time
> To: Steven J. Metalitz
> Cc: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Continuing the discussion on hard bounces, and deciding on terminology
>
>
> But if the email address published in the whois is not functional, you would just need to report it to ICANN compliance which would then investigate and if need be have the applicable registrar update this record.
>
> It seems to me rather more efficient than forcing the P/P provider to befriend its customers on skype. ;-)
>
> Luc
>
>
> On 04 Dec 2014, at 19:29, Metalitz, Steven <met at msk.com<mailto:met at msk.com>> wrote:
>
> Exactly – if e-mail does not function, and there is some other way to contact them in order to relay the message, then the provider should use that other way, at least upon request.  That’s all that we are asking for here.
>
> From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Stephanie Perrin
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:20 AM
> To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Continuing the discussion on hard bounces, and deciding on terminology
>
> Thanks very much, this is extremely useful.  As a representative of dumb users everywhere who are likely to be calling you in a blind panic many days after such an event occurs, I agree that the language we use, bouncing or otherwise, has to be crystal clear.  It also has to take into account the possibility that users may designate some other way to contact them....a cell number, skype, etc.
> Cheers Stephanie
> On 14-12-02 1:28 PM, Christian Dawson wrote:
>
> Colleagues,
>
> I apologize for belaboring the point about ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ bounces when I know we’re not using that terminology, but I wanted to be delve deeper into that conversation to try to get us to acceptable terminology we CAN use. To do so, I want to explain further what I’m talking about.
>
> As I stated on the call, my background is as a web hosting provider. Despite being a small business, I run a network with over a million domain names sitting somewhere on it, and about 517,000 individual mail accounts I am aware of. I want to be clear that the kinds of bounces I was talking about aren’t the kind when you give a bogus gmail or hotmail account. We’re talking about mail from independent resolvers that source back to an independent domain hosted on a server - the kind most often used by one of my web hosting customers, or a customer of that customer, or a customer of that customer of a customer, and so on.
>
> There are tons of reasons for a permanent message failure in situations like these, a lot of them server conditions that are temporary in nature. There’s a good chart worth looking at here:
>
> http://www.activecampaign.com/help/bounces-soft-bounce-vs-hard-bounce/
>
> I’m not a registrar, I’m a web hosting provider and a small business owner - so from my perspective I’m trying to make sure we adopt policies that will keep service tickets to a minimum. As a web hosting provider, I already incur a lot of support costs over the ICANN WHOIS validation process. Every week we have numerous customers who write us complaining of being ‘down’ because they missed an email and ended up getting their business presence suspended. I want to make sure that we adopt standards in a way that doesn’t disadvantage my customers or cause them to open service tickets that cost me money. I think getting the terminology right will be the best way to do that.
>
>
> -------------------------
> Christian J. Dawson                             (703)847-1381 x 7120 Voice
> Chief Operations Officer, ServInt
> www.servint.net<http://www.servint.net/>         dawson at servint.com<mailto:dawson at servint.com>      (703)847-1383 Fax
> -------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
>
> Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
> *******************
>
> DISCLAIMER : This message is sent in confidence and is only intended for the named recipient. If you receive this message by mistake, you may not use, copy, distribute or forward this message, or any part of its contents or rely upon the information contained in it.
> Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the relevant e-mails from any computer. This message does not constitute a commitment by Europol unless otherwise indicated.
>
> *******************
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
>
> Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg