[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] For review - updated templates Cat B, questions 1 and 2

[Don Blumenthal]

Thanks, Marika.

As an added note, for people who are wondering, you are correct that Question 2 was not on the agenda. We got through the scheduled items in 35 minutes and decided to move forward rather than cut the call short. Unless there is significant objection, we will continue to take that approach because we have an ambitious schedule.  Besides, it’s a precaution if we topics take longer than expected later.

Don

From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 at 5:39 AM
To: PPSAI <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] For review - updated templates Cat B, questions 1 and 2

Dear All,

Following our call yesterday, please find attached the updated templates for Category B – questions 1 & 2. Please review these templates to make sure the WG discussions have been accurately reflected and feel free to share any comments / edits you may have with the mailing list. We've created a page on the wiki where we'll post the templates that have been finalised for now (noting that for some of these the WG will need to come back to the template at a later date), see https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg.

The WG will continue its deliberations on Category B – Question 2 next week. Some of the questions that came up during the conversation yesterday and which you are encouraged to share your views on (and/or add additional questions that need to be considered in this context) are:

  *   What would be the arguments for not using the same standards / requirements for validation and verification as per the 2013 RAA?
  *   Should there be a requirement for re-verification, and if so, what instances would trigger such re-verification?
  *   In case of affliction between the P/P service and the registrar, if the registration information has already been verified by the registrar, should this exempt the P/P provider from doing so?
  *   Should the same requirements apply to privacy and proxy services or is there a reason to distinguish between the two?

Best regards,

Marika
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140226/a39be7b6/attachment.html>