[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Latest Questions Groupings Document

h.raiche at internode.on.net h.raiche at internode.on.net
Thu Jan 23 22:01:35 UTC 2014


Hi Don

I'm happy to go with this. I'm sure there will be lots more comments,
but I think the task is to get something out and get people thinking.

On a related matter, APRALO (as host RALO in Singapore) is holding a
two hour multi stakeholder meeting (that's all of you) that was
originally going to look at the metrics issue, but the September Board
decision confined what that work will be, so we are now thinking that
we should change the topic to a discussion on both the P/P and EWG
topics - both being related.  It will be an opportunity for hear from
all stakeholders, with a few speakers from different parts of ICANN.
So if this document has gone out for comment, the forum will be a good
opportunity for everyone to talk through the input. And because the
EWG raises many of the same issues, we can have an update on EWG
progress.

Happy for feedback on that

Holly

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Blumenthal" 
To:"PPSAI" 
Cc:
Sent:Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:45:44 +0000
Subject:[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Latest Questions Groupings Document

Good afternoon, 
 We have done some more tweaking over the last couple of days. We
tried to incorporate all suggestions that we received or heard on
calls. However, some specific points were left out because they struck
us as redundant. Don’t hesitate to say “put it back because it
meant something else in a different group.” 
 The document still needs work: substance, organization, specific
language, typos, and more. However, we are pushing it out now so that
WG members have time to examine, comment, and edit. As I wrote before,
the list will be a fluid document as we continue our work. 
 I’ll add a high level note. Our basic mission is to develop an
accreditation system for p/p providers. Some might even argue that
anything more is beyond our remit. Taking an expansive view, rules for
use of p/p, or a determination that there should be no restrictions,
will be part of developing the accreditation system. On the other
hand, that p/p will continue strikes me as having been established by
ICANN. 
 I look forward to continuing our work 
 Regards, 
 Don 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140124/9de620d0/attachment.html>


More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list