[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Latest Questions Groupings Document

[Don Blumenthal]

Holly,

Thanks for the quick review.

Thanks for letting us know about the possibility of being included in the APRALO program. The SO/AC and SG letters that we worked are going out. I can send you a list of the recipient organizations, or post it on the list if members are interested.  February 28 is the response date.

The document that I sent earlier is intended for WG use in framing our work. However, we should should be able to help with formulating some questions based on where we have gone by then.

Don



From: "h.raiche at internode.on.net<mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>" <h.raiche at internode.on.net<mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>>
Reply-To: "h.raiche at internode.on.net<mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>" <h.raiche at internode.on.net<mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>>
Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 5:01 PM
To: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal at pir.org<mailto:dblumenthal at pir.org>>, PPSAI <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Latest Questions Groupings Document

Hi Don

I'm happy to go with this. I'm sure there will be lots more comments, but I think the task is to get something out and get people thinking.

On a related matter, APRALO (as host RALO in Singapore) is holding a two hour multi stakeholder meeting (that's all of you) that was originally going to look at the metrics issue, but the September Board decision confined what that work will be, so we are now thinking that we should change the topic to a discussion on both the P/P and EWG topics - both being related.  It will be an opportunity for hear from all stakeholders, with a few speakers from different parts of ICANN. So if this document has gone out for comment, the forum will be a good opportunity for everyone to talk through the input. And because the EWG raises many of the same issues, we can have an update on EWG progress.

Happy for feedback on that

Holly




----- Original Message -----
From:
"Don Blumenthal" <dblumenthal at pir.org<mailto:dblumenthal at pir.org>>

To:
"PPSAI" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org>>
Cc:

Sent:
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:45:44 +0000
Subject:
[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Latest Questions Groupings Document


Good afternoon,

We have done some more tweaking over the last couple of days. We tried to incorporate all suggestions that we received or heard on calls. However, some specific points were left out because they struck us as redundant. Don’t hesitate to say “put it back because it meant something else in a different group.”

The document still needs work: substance, organization, specific language, typos, and more. However, we are pushing it out now so that WG members have time to examine, comment, and edit. As I wrote before, the list will be a fluid document as we continue our work.

I’ll add a high level note. Our basic mission is to develop an accreditation system for p/p providers. Some might even argue that anything more is beyond our remit. Taking an expansive view, rules for use of p/p, or a determination that there should be no restrictions, will be part of developing the accreditation system. On the other hand, that p/p will continue strikes me as having been established by ICANN.

I look forward to continuing our work.

Regards,

Don


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140123/1fef9ce4/attachment.html>